Cargando…

Orofacial trauma in rural India: A clinical study

PURPOSE: Orofacial trauma is becoming a leading medical problem worldwide. Most of the studies pertaining to orofacial trauma have been done in urban areas but very little scientific literature is available for rural areas. METHODS: A prospective medical institute-based study of orofacial injury pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malik, Sunita, Singh, Gurdarshan, Kaur, Gagandeep, Yadav, Sunil, Mittal, Hitesh C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5555248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28330802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2016.10.006
_version_ 1783256899522658304
author Malik, Sunita
Singh, Gurdarshan
Kaur, Gagandeep
Yadav, Sunil
Mittal, Hitesh C.
author_facet Malik, Sunita
Singh, Gurdarshan
Kaur, Gagandeep
Yadav, Sunil
Mittal, Hitesh C.
author_sort Malik, Sunita
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Orofacial trauma is becoming a leading medical problem worldwide. Most of the studies pertaining to orofacial trauma have been done in urban areas but very little scientific literature is available for rural areas. METHODS: A prospective medical institute-based study of orofacial injury patients was carried out from May 2013 to April 2016 (36 Months). Data regarding incidence, age and sex distribution, causes, types and site of injury, treatment modalities and trauma associated complications were collected and analysed. RESULTS: A total of 784 patients were studied. Males outnumbered females by a ratio of 2.9:1. Age range was 9 months–75 years with the peak incidence in the age-group of 18–34 years. Most injuries were caused by road-side accidents (72.7%), followed by assault and falls in 11.6% and 8% respectively. Soft tissue injuries and mandibular fractures were the most common type of injuries. Head/neck (50.29%) and limb injuries (27.2%) were the most prevalent associated injuries. Surgical debridement and soft tissue suturing was the most common emergency procedure. Closed reduction was performed in 61% of patients and open reduction and internal fixation in 30% of cases and 9% were managed conservatively. Complications occurred in 6.88% of patients, mainly due to infection and malocclusion. The mean duration of hospital stay was (10.12 ± 6.24) days. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the importance of department of dental surgery along with other disciplinaries in the management of orofacial injuries. Road-side accident remains the major etiological factor of orofacial injuries in our setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5555248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55552482017-08-22 Orofacial trauma in rural India: A clinical study Malik, Sunita Singh, Gurdarshan Kaur, Gagandeep Yadav, Sunil Mittal, Hitesh C. Chin J Traumatol Original Article PURPOSE: Orofacial trauma is becoming a leading medical problem worldwide. Most of the studies pertaining to orofacial trauma have been done in urban areas but very little scientific literature is available for rural areas. METHODS: A prospective medical institute-based study of orofacial injury patients was carried out from May 2013 to April 2016 (36 Months). Data regarding incidence, age and sex distribution, causes, types and site of injury, treatment modalities and trauma associated complications were collected and analysed. RESULTS: A total of 784 patients were studied. Males outnumbered females by a ratio of 2.9:1. Age range was 9 months–75 years with the peak incidence in the age-group of 18–34 years. Most injuries were caused by road-side accidents (72.7%), followed by assault and falls in 11.6% and 8% respectively. Soft tissue injuries and mandibular fractures were the most common type of injuries. Head/neck (50.29%) and limb injuries (27.2%) were the most prevalent associated injuries. Surgical debridement and soft tissue suturing was the most common emergency procedure. Closed reduction was performed in 61% of patients and open reduction and internal fixation in 30% of cases and 9% were managed conservatively. Complications occurred in 6.88% of patients, mainly due to infection and malocclusion. The mean duration of hospital stay was (10.12 ± 6.24) days. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the importance of department of dental surgery along with other disciplinaries in the management of orofacial injuries. Road-side accident remains the major etiological factor of orofacial injuries in our setting. Elsevier 2017-08 2017-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5555248/ /pubmed/28330802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2016.10.006 Text en © 2017 Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Malik, Sunita
Singh, Gurdarshan
Kaur, Gagandeep
Yadav, Sunil
Mittal, Hitesh C.
Orofacial trauma in rural India: A clinical study
title Orofacial trauma in rural India: A clinical study
title_full Orofacial trauma in rural India: A clinical study
title_fullStr Orofacial trauma in rural India: A clinical study
title_full_unstemmed Orofacial trauma in rural India: A clinical study
title_short Orofacial trauma in rural India: A clinical study
title_sort orofacial trauma in rural india: a clinical study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5555248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28330802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2016.10.006
work_keys_str_mv AT maliksunita orofacialtraumainruralindiaaclinicalstudy
AT singhgurdarshan orofacialtraumainruralindiaaclinicalstudy
AT kaurgagandeep orofacialtraumainruralindiaaclinicalstudy
AT yadavsunil orofacialtraumainruralindiaaclinicalstudy
AT mittalhiteshc orofacialtraumainruralindiaaclinicalstudy