Cargando…
The Impact of Face Inversion on Animacy Categorization
Face animacy perception is categorical: Gradual changes in the real/artificial appearance of a face lead to nonlinear behavioral responses. Neural markers of face processing are also sensitive to face animacy, further suggesting that these are meaningful perceptual categories. Artificial faces also...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5555512/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28835814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2041669517723653 |
_version_ | 1783256929540243456 |
---|---|
author | Balas, Benjamin van Lamsweerde, Amanda E. Auen, Amanda Saville, Alyson |
author_facet | Balas, Benjamin van Lamsweerde, Amanda E. Auen, Amanda Saville, Alyson |
author_sort | Balas, Benjamin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Face animacy perception is categorical: Gradual changes in the real/artificial appearance of a face lead to nonlinear behavioral responses. Neural markers of face processing are also sensitive to face animacy, further suggesting that these are meaningful perceptual categories. Artificial faces also appear to be an “out-group” relative to real faces such that behavioral markers of expert-level processing are less evident with artificial faces than real ones. In the current study, we examined how categorical processing of real versus doll faces was impacted by the face inversion effect, which is one of the most robust markers of expert face processing. We examined how explicit categorization of faces drawn from a real/doll morph continuum was affected by face inversion (Experiment 1) and also how the response properties of the N170 were impacted by face animacy and inversion. We found that inversion does not change the position or steepness of the category boundary measured behaviorally. Further, neural markers of face processing are equally impacted by inversion regardless of whether they are elicited by real faces or doll faces. On balance, our results indicate that inversion has a limited impact on the categorical perception of face animacy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5555512 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55555122017-08-23 The Impact of Face Inversion on Animacy Categorization Balas, Benjamin van Lamsweerde, Amanda E. Auen, Amanda Saville, Alyson Iperception Article Face animacy perception is categorical: Gradual changes in the real/artificial appearance of a face lead to nonlinear behavioral responses. Neural markers of face processing are also sensitive to face animacy, further suggesting that these are meaningful perceptual categories. Artificial faces also appear to be an “out-group” relative to real faces such that behavioral markers of expert-level processing are less evident with artificial faces than real ones. In the current study, we examined how categorical processing of real versus doll faces was impacted by the face inversion effect, which is one of the most robust markers of expert face processing. We examined how explicit categorization of faces drawn from a real/doll morph continuum was affected by face inversion (Experiment 1) and also how the response properties of the N170 were impacted by face animacy and inversion. We found that inversion does not change the position or steepness of the category boundary measured behaviorally. Further, neural markers of face processing are equally impacted by inversion regardless of whether they are elicited by real faces or doll faces. On balance, our results indicate that inversion has a limited impact on the categorical perception of face animacy. SAGE Publications 2017-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5555512/ /pubmed/28835814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2041669517723653 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Article Balas, Benjamin van Lamsweerde, Amanda E. Auen, Amanda Saville, Alyson The Impact of Face Inversion on Animacy Categorization |
title | The Impact of Face Inversion on Animacy Categorization |
title_full | The Impact of Face Inversion on Animacy Categorization |
title_fullStr | The Impact of Face Inversion on Animacy Categorization |
title_full_unstemmed | The Impact of Face Inversion on Animacy Categorization |
title_short | The Impact of Face Inversion on Animacy Categorization |
title_sort | impact of face inversion on animacy categorization |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5555512/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28835814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2041669517723653 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT balasbenjamin theimpactoffaceinversiononanimacycategorization AT vanlamsweerdeamandae theimpactoffaceinversiononanimacycategorization AT auenamanda theimpactoffaceinversiononanimacycategorization AT savillealyson theimpactoffaceinversiononanimacycategorization AT balasbenjamin impactoffaceinversiononanimacycategorization AT vanlamsweerdeamandae impactoffaceinversiononanimacycategorization AT auenamanda impactoffaceinversiononanimacycategorization AT savillealyson impactoffaceinversiononanimacycategorization |