Cargando…
The use of (18)F-Fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG PET) as a non-invasive pharmacodynamic biomarker to determine the minimally pharmacologically active dose of AZD8835, a novel PI3Kα inhibitor
BACKGROUND: The phosphatidyl inositol 3 kinase (PI3K), AKT and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signal transduction pathway is frequently de-regulated and activated in human cancer and is an important therapeutic target. AZD8835 is a PI3K inhibitor, with selectivity against PI3K α and δ isoforms...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5555689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28806782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183048 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: The phosphatidyl inositol 3 kinase (PI3K), AKT and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signal transduction pathway is frequently de-regulated and activated in human cancer and is an important therapeutic target. AZD8835 is a PI3K inhibitor, with selectivity against PI3K α and δ isoforms, which is currently in Phase 1 clinical trials. (18)F-Fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG PET) is a non-invasive pharmacodynamic imaging biomarker that has become an integral part of drug development. It has been used widely with PI3K inhibitors both clinically and pre-clinically because of the role of the PI3K pathway in glucose metabolism. In this study we investigated the potential of (18)F-FDG PET as a non-invasive pharmacodynamic biomarker for AZD8835. We sought to understand if (18)F-FDG PET could determine the minimally effective dose of AZD8835 and correlate with other pharmacodynamic biomarkers for validation of its use in clinical development. (18)F-FDG PET scans were performed in nude mice in the BT474C breast xenograft model. Mice were fasted prior to imaging and static (18)F-FDG PET was performed. Treatment groups received AZD8835 by oral gavage at a dose volume of 10ml/kg. Treatment groups received either 3, 6, 12.5, 25 or 50mg/kg AZD8835. Tumour growth was monitored throughout the study, and at the end of the imaging procedure, tumours were taken and a full pharmacodynamic analysis was performed. RESULTS: Results showed that AZD8835 reduced (18)F-FDG uptake at a dose of 12.5, 25 and 50mg/kg with no significant reduction at doses of 3 and 6mg/kg. These results were consistent with other pharmacodynamics biomarkers measured and show (18)F-FDG PET as a sensitive biomarker with the ability to determine the minimal effective dose of AZD8835. CONCLUSIONS: Our pre-clinical studies support the use of (18)F-FDG PET imaging as a sensitive and non- invasive pharmacodynamic biomarker (understanding the role of PI3K signalling in glucose uptake) for AZD8835 with a decrease in (18)F-FDG uptake observed at only two hours post treatment. The decrease in (18)F-FDG uptake was dose dependent and data showed excellent PK/PD correlation. This data supports and parallels observations obtained with this class of compounds in patients |
---|