Cargando…

A synthetic analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from manure amended agricultural soils in China

Application of manure has been recommended as an effective strategy to to mitigate climate change. However, the magnitude of greenhouse gases emission derived by application of manure to agricultural soils across environmental conditions still remains unclear. Here, we synthesized data from 379 obse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ren, Fengling, Zhang, Xubo, Liu, Jian, Sun, Nan, Wu, Lianhai, Li, Zhongfang, Xu, Minggang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5556094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28808231
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07793-6
_version_ 1783257003590680576
author Ren, Fengling
Zhang, Xubo
Liu, Jian
Sun, Nan
Wu, Lianhai
Li, Zhongfang
Xu, Minggang
author_facet Ren, Fengling
Zhang, Xubo
Liu, Jian
Sun, Nan
Wu, Lianhai
Li, Zhongfang
Xu, Minggang
author_sort Ren, Fengling
collection PubMed
description Application of manure has been recommended as an effective strategy to to mitigate climate change. However, the magnitude of greenhouse gases emission derived by application of manure to agricultural soils across environmental conditions still remains unclear. Here, we synthesized data from 379 observations in China and quantified the responses of soil nitrous oxide (N(2)O), carbon dioxide (CO(2)) and methane (CH(4)) emissions to manure (Org-M) in comparison to chemical fertilizers (Min-F) or non-fertilizers (Non-F). The results showed that N(2)O, CO(2) and CH(4) emissions were significantly affected by Org-M compared to Min-F (percentage change: −3, +15 and +60%, P < 0.05) and Non-F (percentage change: +289, +84 and +83%, P < 0.05), respectively. However, at the same amount of total N input, Org-M decreased soil N(2)O emission by 13% and CH(4) emission by 12%, and increased soil CO(2) emission by 26% relative to Min-F in upland soils. For paddy soils, N(2)O, CO(2) and CH(4) emissions differed by −3%, −36% and +84% between Org-M and Min-F (i.e., Org-M minus Min-F). Thus, practices such as application of manure instead of chemical fertilizer and decreasing nitrogen input rate need to be highly considered and optimized under different soils and climate conditions to mitigate GHGs emission in China.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5556094
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55560942017-08-16 A synthetic analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from manure amended agricultural soils in China Ren, Fengling Zhang, Xubo Liu, Jian Sun, Nan Wu, Lianhai Li, Zhongfang Xu, Minggang Sci Rep Article Application of manure has been recommended as an effective strategy to to mitigate climate change. However, the magnitude of greenhouse gases emission derived by application of manure to agricultural soils across environmental conditions still remains unclear. Here, we synthesized data from 379 observations in China and quantified the responses of soil nitrous oxide (N(2)O), carbon dioxide (CO(2)) and methane (CH(4)) emissions to manure (Org-M) in comparison to chemical fertilizers (Min-F) or non-fertilizers (Non-F). The results showed that N(2)O, CO(2) and CH(4) emissions were significantly affected by Org-M compared to Min-F (percentage change: −3, +15 and +60%, P < 0.05) and Non-F (percentage change: +289, +84 and +83%, P < 0.05), respectively. However, at the same amount of total N input, Org-M decreased soil N(2)O emission by 13% and CH(4) emission by 12%, and increased soil CO(2) emission by 26% relative to Min-F in upland soils. For paddy soils, N(2)O, CO(2) and CH(4) emissions differed by −3%, −36% and +84% between Org-M and Min-F (i.e., Org-M minus Min-F). Thus, practices such as application of manure instead of chemical fertilizer and decreasing nitrogen input rate need to be highly considered and optimized under different soils and climate conditions to mitigate GHGs emission in China. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5556094/ /pubmed/28808231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07793-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Ren, Fengling
Zhang, Xubo
Liu, Jian
Sun, Nan
Wu, Lianhai
Li, Zhongfang
Xu, Minggang
A synthetic analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from manure amended agricultural soils in China
title A synthetic analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from manure amended agricultural soils in China
title_full A synthetic analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from manure amended agricultural soils in China
title_fullStr A synthetic analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from manure amended agricultural soils in China
title_full_unstemmed A synthetic analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from manure amended agricultural soils in China
title_short A synthetic analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from manure amended agricultural soils in China
title_sort synthetic analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from manure amended agricultural soils in china
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5556094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28808231
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07793-6
work_keys_str_mv AT renfengling asyntheticanalysisofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanureamendedagriculturalsoilsinchina
AT zhangxubo asyntheticanalysisofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanureamendedagriculturalsoilsinchina
AT liujian asyntheticanalysisofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanureamendedagriculturalsoilsinchina
AT sunnan asyntheticanalysisofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanureamendedagriculturalsoilsinchina
AT wulianhai asyntheticanalysisofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanureamendedagriculturalsoilsinchina
AT lizhongfang asyntheticanalysisofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanureamendedagriculturalsoilsinchina
AT xuminggang asyntheticanalysisofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanureamendedagriculturalsoilsinchina
AT renfengling syntheticanalysisofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanureamendedagriculturalsoilsinchina
AT zhangxubo syntheticanalysisofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanureamendedagriculturalsoilsinchina
AT liujian syntheticanalysisofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanureamendedagriculturalsoilsinchina
AT sunnan syntheticanalysisofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanureamendedagriculturalsoilsinchina
AT wulianhai syntheticanalysisofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanureamendedagriculturalsoilsinchina
AT lizhongfang syntheticanalysisofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanureamendedagriculturalsoilsinchina
AT xuminggang syntheticanalysisofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommanureamendedagriculturalsoilsinchina