Cargando…

Prostate cancer screening in a low prevalence population: Is it worth it?

OBJECTIVES: To embrace a national screening program for prostate cancer, putting into consideration the cost, and the attitude of the general population towards such screening. METHODS: Men aged >45 and <70 years were invited to participate in the current prospective study conducted at King Sa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arafa, Mostafa A., Farhat, Karim H., Al-Atawi, Mohamed A., Rabah, Danny M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Saudi Medical Journal 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5556281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28674719
http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2017.7.18643
_version_ 1783257039485534208
author Arafa, Mostafa A.
Farhat, Karim H.
Al-Atawi, Mohamed A.
Rabah, Danny M.
author_facet Arafa, Mostafa A.
Farhat, Karim H.
Al-Atawi, Mohamed A.
Rabah, Danny M.
author_sort Arafa, Mostafa A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To embrace a national screening program for prostate cancer, putting into consideration the cost, and the attitude of the general population towards such screening. METHODS: Men aged >45 and <70 years were invited to participate in the current prospective study conducted at King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia between December 2014 and July 2015. Those with confirmed high prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (≥4 ng/ml) were referred to the urology clinic, then subjected to magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: The total cohort screened were 2898, we found 118 cases with high PSA (≥4 ng/ml). Fifty-two cases (60.4%) were confirmed high PSA. All of them were subjected to MRI and biopsy. The confirmed prostate cancer were 7 cases (0.24%). The age of confirmed prostate cancer cases ranged from 49 years to 68 years, Gleason score for 4 cases was low grade (3+3), while it was 3+4 for 2 cases, and only one case had advanced cancer (3+5). Approximately 12% of cases with high PSA did not show up for confirmation of their results for further examination. CONCLUSIONS: The present study recommends against mass screening among Saudi population; however, men before 50 years of age should start PSA blood testing until before 70 years after discussing the benefits and harms of such screening through shared decision making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5556281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Saudi Medical Journal
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55562812017-08-28 Prostate cancer screening in a low prevalence population: Is it worth it? Arafa, Mostafa A. Farhat, Karim H. Al-Atawi, Mohamed A. Rabah, Danny M. Saudi Med J Original Article OBJECTIVES: To embrace a national screening program for prostate cancer, putting into consideration the cost, and the attitude of the general population towards such screening. METHODS: Men aged >45 and <70 years were invited to participate in the current prospective study conducted at King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia between December 2014 and July 2015. Those with confirmed high prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (≥4 ng/ml) were referred to the urology clinic, then subjected to magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: The total cohort screened were 2898, we found 118 cases with high PSA (≥4 ng/ml). Fifty-two cases (60.4%) were confirmed high PSA. All of them were subjected to MRI and biopsy. The confirmed prostate cancer were 7 cases (0.24%). The age of confirmed prostate cancer cases ranged from 49 years to 68 years, Gleason score for 4 cases was low grade (3+3), while it was 3+4 for 2 cases, and only one case had advanced cancer (3+5). Approximately 12% of cases with high PSA did not show up for confirmation of their results for further examination. CONCLUSIONS: The present study recommends against mass screening among Saudi population; however, men before 50 years of age should start PSA blood testing until before 70 years after discussing the benefits and harms of such screening through shared decision making. Saudi Medical Journal 2017-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5556281/ /pubmed/28674719 http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2017.7.18643 Text en Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Arafa, Mostafa A.
Farhat, Karim H.
Al-Atawi, Mohamed A.
Rabah, Danny M.
Prostate cancer screening in a low prevalence population: Is it worth it?
title Prostate cancer screening in a low prevalence population: Is it worth it?
title_full Prostate cancer screening in a low prevalence population: Is it worth it?
title_fullStr Prostate cancer screening in a low prevalence population: Is it worth it?
title_full_unstemmed Prostate cancer screening in a low prevalence population: Is it worth it?
title_short Prostate cancer screening in a low prevalence population: Is it worth it?
title_sort prostate cancer screening in a low prevalence population: is it worth it?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5556281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28674719
http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2017.7.18643
work_keys_str_mv AT arafamostafaa prostatecancerscreeninginalowprevalencepopulationisitworthit
AT farhatkarimh prostatecancerscreeninginalowprevalencepopulationisitworthit
AT alatawimohameda prostatecancerscreeninginalowprevalencepopulationisitworthit
AT rabahdannym prostatecancerscreeninginalowprevalencepopulationisitworthit