Cargando…

Health-related quality of life in the Brazilian Amazon: a population-based cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: To analyze perceptions of health-related quality of life and associated factors in populations from the Manaus Metropolitan Region. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cross-sectional study from May to August 2015. Adults aged 18 years and older were selected using probabilistic thr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silva, Marcus Tolentino, Caicedo Roa, Monica, Galvao, Tais Freire
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5556350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28807027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0734-5
_version_ 1783257052595879936
author Silva, Marcus Tolentino
Caicedo Roa, Monica
Galvao, Tais Freire
author_facet Silva, Marcus Tolentino
Caicedo Roa, Monica
Galvao, Tais Freire
author_sort Silva, Marcus Tolentino
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To analyze perceptions of health-related quality of life and associated factors in populations from the Manaus Metropolitan Region. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cross-sectional study from May to August 2015. Adults aged 18 years and older were selected using probabilistic three-phase cluster sampling and stratified by sex and age, based on official estimates. Quality of life data were collected using the European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions 3-Levels (EQ-5D-3L) along with socioeconomic, demographic, and health perception data. Utility scores were calculated using the Brazilian version of the EQ-5D-3L. Descriptive statistics were derived, and a multivariate Tobit regression model with correction for complex sampling was performed to identify the variables that influence utility levels. RESULTS: A total of 4001 participants were included. The average utility score was 0.886 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.881–0.890) with significant differences according to living area (the capital (0.882 ± 0.144) or inner cities (0.908 ± 0.122; p < 0.001)). The dimension for which the highest proportion of people reported moderate to severe problems was pain/discomfort (39%), followed by anxiety/depression (18%). Men had a higher quality of life than women (β = 0.041, p < 0.001). Not working was a factor that increased quality of life compared with being formally employed (β = 0.031, p = 0.037). The poorest people had a lower quality of life than the richest people (β = −0.118, p < 0.001). Better health perceptions increased utility scores (p < 0.001), while being separated decreased the scores (β = −0.052, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Health-related quality of life in the Manaus Metropolitan Region was high, as expected for the general population, and was higher among individuals who lived in the inner cities, men and those in higher social classes. Gender discrepancies and differences in quality of life between the capital and inner cities should be further investigated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5556350
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55563502017-08-16 Health-related quality of life in the Brazilian Amazon: a population-based cross-sectional study Silva, Marcus Tolentino Caicedo Roa, Monica Galvao, Tais Freire Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: To analyze perceptions of health-related quality of life and associated factors in populations from the Manaus Metropolitan Region. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cross-sectional study from May to August 2015. Adults aged 18 years and older were selected using probabilistic three-phase cluster sampling and stratified by sex and age, based on official estimates. Quality of life data were collected using the European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions 3-Levels (EQ-5D-3L) along with socioeconomic, demographic, and health perception data. Utility scores were calculated using the Brazilian version of the EQ-5D-3L. Descriptive statistics were derived, and a multivariate Tobit regression model with correction for complex sampling was performed to identify the variables that influence utility levels. RESULTS: A total of 4001 participants were included. The average utility score was 0.886 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.881–0.890) with significant differences according to living area (the capital (0.882 ± 0.144) or inner cities (0.908 ± 0.122; p < 0.001)). The dimension for which the highest proportion of people reported moderate to severe problems was pain/discomfort (39%), followed by anxiety/depression (18%). Men had a higher quality of life than women (β = 0.041, p < 0.001). Not working was a factor that increased quality of life compared with being formally employed (β = 0.031, p = 0.037). The poorest people had a lower quality of life than the richest people (β = −0.118, p < 0.001). Better health perceptions increased utility scores (p < 0.001), while being separated decreased the scores (β = −0.052, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Health-related quality of life in the Manaus Metropolitan Region was high, as expected for the general population, and was higher among individuals who lived in the inner cities, men and those in higher social classes. Gender discrepancies and differences in quality of life between the capital and inner cities should be further investigated. BioMed Central 2017-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5556350/ /pubmed/28807027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0734-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Silva, Marcus Tolentino
Caicedo Roa, Monica
Galvao, Tais Freire
Health-related quality of life in the Brazilian Amazon: a population-based cross-sectional study
title Health-related quality of life in the Brazilian Amazon: a population-based cross-sectional study
title_full Health-related quality of life in the Brazilian Amazon: a population-based cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Health-related quality of life in the Brazilian Amazon: a population-based cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Health-related quality of life in the Brazilian Amazon: a population-based cross-sectional study
title_short Health-related quality of life in the Brazilian Amazon: a population-based cross-sectional study
title_sort health-related quality of life in the brazilian amazon: a population-based cross-sectional study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5556350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28807027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0734-5
work_keys_str_mv AT silvamarcustolentino healthrelatedqualityoflifeinthebrazilianamazonapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT caicedoroamonica healthrelatedqualityoflifeinthebrazilianamazonapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT galvaotaisfreire healthrelatedqualityoflifeinthebrazilianamazonapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudy