Cargando…
Health-related quality of life in the Brazilian Amazon: a population-based cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: To analyze perceptions of health-related quality of life and associated factors in populations from the Manaus Metropolitan Region. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cross-sectional study from May to August 2015. Adults aged 18 years and older were selected using probabilistic thr...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5556350/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28807027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0734-5 |
_version_ | 1783257052595879936 |
---|---|
author | Silva, Marcus Tolentino Caicedo Roa, Monica Galvao, Tais Freire |
author_facet | Silva, Marcus Tolentino Caicedo Roa, Monica Galvao, Tais Freire |
author_sort | Silva, Marcus Tolentino |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To analyze perceptions of health-related quality of life and associated factors in populations from the Manaus Metropolitan Region. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cross-sectional study from May to August 2015. Adults aged 18 years and older were selected using probabilistic three-phase cluster sampling and stratified by sex and age, based on official estimates. Quality of life data were collected using the European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions 3-Levels (EQ-5D-3L) along with socioeconomic, demographic, and health perception data. Utility scores were calculated using the Brazilian version of the EQ-5D-3L. Descriptive statistics were derived, and a multivariate Tobit regression model with correction for complex sampling was performed to identify the variables that influence utility levels. RESULTS: A total of 4001 participants were included. The average utility score was 0.886 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.881–0.890) with significant differences according to living area (the capital (0.882 ± 0.144) or inner cities (0.908 ± 0.122; p < 0.001)). The dimension for which the highest proportion of people reported moderate to severe problems was pain/discomfort (39%), followed by anxiety/depression (18%). Men had a higher quality of life than women (β = 0.041, p < 0.001). Not working was a factor that increased quality of life compared with being formally employed (β = 0.031, p = 0.037). The poorest people had a lower quality of life than the richest people (β = −0.118, p < 0.001). Better health perceptions increased utility scores (p < 0.001), while being separated decreased the scores (β = −0.052, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Health-related quality of life in the Manaus Metropolitan Region was high, as expected for the general population, and was higher among individuals who lived in the inner cities, men and those in higher social classes. Gender discrepancies and differences in quality of life between the capital and inner cities should be further investigated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5556350 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55563502017-08-16 Health-related quality of life in the Brazilian Amazon: a population-based cross-sectional study Silva, Marcus Tolentino Caicedo Roa, Monica Galvao, Tais Freire Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: To analyze perceptions of health-related quality of life and associated factors in populations from the Manaus Metropolitan Region. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cross-sectional study from May to August 2015. Adults aged 18 years and older were selected using probabilistic three-phase cluster sampling and stratified by sex and age, based on official estimates. Quality of life data were collected using the European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions 3-Levels (EQ-5D-3L) along with socioeconomic, demographic, and health perception data. Utility scores were calculated using the Brazilian version of the EQ-5D-3L. Descriptive statistics were derived, and a multivariate Tobit regression model with correction for complex sampling was performed to identify the variables that influence utility levels. RESULTS: A total of 4001 participants were included. The average utility score was 0.886 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.881–0.890) with significant differences according to living area (the capital (0.882 ± 0.144) or inner cities (0.908 ± 0.122; p < 0.001)). The dimension for which the highest proportion of people reported moderate to severe problems was pain/discomfort (39%), followed by anxiety/depression (18%). Men had a higher quality of life than women (β = 0.041, p < 0.001). Not working was a factor that increased quality of life compared with being formally employed (β = 0.031, p = 0.037). The poorest people had a lower quality of life than the richest people (β = −0.118, p < 0.001). Better health perceptions increased utility scores (p < 0.001), while being separated decreased the scores (β = −0.052, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Health-related quality of life in the Manaus Metropolitan Region was high, as expected for the general population, and was higher among individuals who lived in the inner cities, men and those in higher social classes. Gender discrepancies and differences in quality of life between the capital and inner cities should be further investigated. BioMed Central 2017-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5556350/ /pubmed/28807027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0734-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Silva, Marcus Tolentino Caicedo Roa, Monica Galvao, Tais Freire Health-related quality of life in the Brazilian Amazon: a population-based cross-sectional study |
title | Health-related quality of life in the Brazilian Amazon: a population-based cross-sectional study |
title_full | Health-related quality of life in the Brazilian Amazon: a population-based cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Health-related quality of life in the Brazilian Amazon: a population-based cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Health-related quality of life in the Brazilian Amazon: a population-based cross-sectional study |
title_short | Health-related quality of life in the Brazilian Amazon: a population-based cross-sectional study |
title_sort | health-related quality of life in the brazilian amazon: a population-based cross-sectional study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5556350/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28807027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0734-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT silvamarcustolentino healthrelatedqualityoflifeinthebrazilianamazonapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudy AT caicedoroamonica healthrelatedqualityoflifeinthebrazilianamazonapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudy AT galvaotaisfreire healthrelatedqualityoflifeinthebrazilianamazonapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudy |