Cargando…
Are care plans suitable for the management of multiple conditions?
BACKGROUND: Care plans have been part of the primary care landscape in Australia for almost two decades. With an increasing number of patients presenting with multiple chronic conditions, it is timely to consider whether care plans meet the needs of patients and clinicians. OBJECTIVES: To review and...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Swiss Medical Press GmbH
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5556452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29090181 http://dx.doi.org/10.15256/joc.2016.6.79 |
_version_ | 1783257066788356096 |
---|---|
author | Young, Charlotte E. Boyle, Frances M. Mutch, Allyson J. |
author_facet | Young, Charlotte E. Boyle, Frances M. Mutch, Allyson J. |
author_sort | Young, Charlotte E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Care plans have been part of the primary care landscape in Australia for almost two decades. With an increasing number of patients presenting with multiple chronic conditions, it is timely to consider whether care plans meet the needs of patients and clinicians. OBJECTIVES: To review and benchmark existing care plan templates that include recommendations for comorbid conditions, against four key criteria: (i) patient preferences, (ii) setting priorities, (iii) identifying conflicts and synergies between conditions, and (iv) setting dates for reviewing the care plan. DESIGN: Document analysis of Australian care plan templates published from 2006 to 2014 that incorporated recommendations for managing comorbid conditions in primary care. RESULTS: Sixteen templates were reviewed. All of the care plan templates addressed patient preference, but this was not done comprehensively. Only three templates included setting priorities. None assisted in identifying conflicts and synergies between conditions. Fifteen templates included setting a date for reviewing the care plan. CONCLUSIONS: Care plans are a well-used tool in primary care practice, but their current format perpetuates a single-disease approach to care, which works contrary to their intended purpose. Restructuring care plans to incorporate shared decision-making and attention to patient preferences may assist in shifting the focus back to the patient and their care needs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5556452 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Swiss Medical Press GmbH |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55564522017-10-31 Are care plans suitable for the management of multiple conditions? Young, Charlotte E. Boyle, Frances M. Mutch, Allyson J. J Comorb Original Article BACKGROUND: Care plans have been part of the primary care landscape in Australia for almost two decades. With an increasing number of patients presenting with multiple chronic conditions, it is timely to consider whether care plans meet the needs of patients and clinicians. OBJECTIVES: To review and benchmark existing care plan templates that include recommendations for comorbid conditions, against four key criteria: (i) patient preferences, (ii) setting priorities, (iii) identifying conflicts and synergies between conditions, and (iv) setting dates for reviewing the care plan. DESIGN: Document analysis of Australian care plan templates published from 2006 to 2014 that incorporated recommendations for managing comorbid conditions in primary care. RESULTS: Sixteen templates were reviewed. All of the care plan templates addressed patient preference, but this was not done comprehensively. Only three templates included setting priorities. None assisted in identifying conflicts and synergies between conditions. Fifteen templates included setting a date for reviewing the care plan. CONCLUSIONS: Care plans are a well-used tool in primary care practice, but their current format perpetuates a single-disease approach to care, which works contrary to their intended purpose. Restructuring care plans to incorporate shared decision-making and attention to patient preferences may assist in shifting the focus back to the patient and their care needs. Swiss Medical Press GmbH 2016-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5556452/ /pubmed/29090181 http://dx.doi.org/10.15256/joc.2016.6.79 Text en Copyright: © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits all noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Young, Charlotte E. Boyle, Frances M. Mutch, Allyson J. Are care plans suitable for the management of multiple conditions? |
title | Are care plans suitable for the management of multiple conditions? |
title_full | Are care plans suitable for the management of multiple conditions? |
title_fullStr | Are care plans suitable for the management of multiple conditions? |
title_full_unstemmed | Are care plans suitable for the management of multiple conditions? |
title_short | Are care plans suitable for the management of multiple conditions? |
title_sort | are care plans suitable for the management of multiple conditions? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5556452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29090181 http://dx.doi.org/10.15256/joc.2016.6.79 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT youngcharlottee arecareplanssuitableforthemanagementofmultipleconditions AT boylefrancesm arecareplanssuitableforthemanagementofmultipleconditions AT mutchallysonj arecareplanssuitableforthemanagementofmultipleconditions |