Cargando…
Short-term effectiveness of inpatient cancer rehabilitation: A longitudinal controlled cohort study
Background: Inpatient rehabilitation for cancer patients has been demonstrated to improve patients' health related quality of life (HRQoL) effectively. The purpose of this study was to compare changes in general health and HRQoL of cancer patients who were referred to inpatient rehabilitation (...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ivyspring International Publisher
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5556633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28819367 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.19564 |
_version_ | 1783257102252244992 |
---|---|
author | Ture, Maria Angst, Felix Aeschlimann, André Renner, Christoph Schnyder, Ulrich Zerkiebel, Nic Perseus, Josef Barth, Jürgen Bredell, Marius Soelch, Chantal Martin Walt, Heinrich Jenewein, Josef |
author_facet | Ture, Maria Angst, Felix Aeschlimann, André Renner, Christoph Schnyder, Ulrich Zerkiebel, Nic Perseus, Josef Barth, Jürgen Bredell, Marius Soelch, Chantal Martin Walt, Heinrich Jenewein, Josef |
author_sort | Ture, Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Inpatient rehabilitation for cancer patients has been demonstrated to improve patients' health related quality of life (HRQoL) effectively. The purpose of this study was to compare changes in general health and HRQoL of cancer patients who were referred to inpatient rehabilitation (IR) with those in two control groups who underwent outpatient management either with advice for inpatient rehabilitation (A(+)) or without (A(-)). Methods: In this naturalistic, longitudinal, controlled cohort study, changes in general health and HRQoL were assessed at either discharge of acute hospital or start of rehabilitation (baseline) and at the follow-up 3 weeks later or end of rehabilitation. Outcome variables included general health and HRQoL assessed by the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT), and fatigue (FACT-F), depression and anxiety by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Changes on the scores were compared with bivariate and multivariate analyses using standardized mean differences (SMD). Results: IR patients (n=133) were on average older, reported lower HRQoL and health, and suffered more frequently from carcinoma than patients of the A(+) (n=30) and the A(-) (n=82) groups. In the IR patients, pain, physical functioning, mental health, vitality, and fatigue improved significantly compared to the A(+) controls. Compared to the A(- )group, the bivariate effects were lower but still statistically significant on many scales. Conclusions: IR showed moderate, statistically significant superior effects over outpatient management of cancer patients after acute treatment. Findings indicate that inpatient cancer rehabilitation can be recommended as an effective management after acute treatment. As today, referrals to inpatient rehabilitation for cancer patients are still not based on structured standardized procedures, the implementation of such screening is needed to address patients' needs and to render the potential for rehabilitation more reliable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5556633 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Ivyspring International Publisher |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55566332017-08-17 Short-term effectiveness of inpatient cancer rehabilitation: A longitudinal controlled cohort study Ture, Maria Angst, Felix Aeschlimann, André Renner, Christoph Schnyder, Ulrich Zerkiebel, Nic Perseus, Josef Barth, Jürgen Bredell, Marius Soelch, Chantal Martin Walt, Heinrich Jenewein, Josef J Cancer Research Paper Background: Inpatient rehabilitation for cancer patients has been demonstrated to improve patients' health related quality of life (HRQoL) effectively. The purpose of this study was to compare changes in general health and HRQoL of cancer patients who were referred to inpatient rehabilitation (IR) with those in two control groups who underwent outpatient management either with advice for inpatient rehabilitation (A(+)) or without (A(-)). Methods: In this naturalistic, longitudinal, controlled cohort study, changes in general health and HRQoL were assessed at either discharge of acute hospital or start of rehabilitation (baseline) and at the follow-up 3 weeks later or end of rehabilitation. Outcome variables included general health and HRQoL assessed by the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT), and fatigue (FACT-F), depression and anxiety by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Changes on the scores were compared with bivariate and multivariate analyses using standardized mean differences (SMD). Results: IR patients (n=133) were on average older, reported lower HRQoL and health, and suffered more frequently from carcinoma than patients of the A(+) (n=30) and the A(-) (n=82) groups. In the IR patients, pain, physical functioning, mental health, vitality, and fatigue improved significantly compared to the A(+) controls. Compared to the A(- )group, the bivariate effects were lower but still statistically significant on many scales. Conclusions: IR showed moderate, statistically significant superior effects over outpatient management of cancer patients after acute treatment. Findings indicate that inpatient cancer rehabilitation can be recommended as an effective management after acute treatment. As today, referrals to inpatient rehabilitation for cancer patients are still not based on structured standardized procedures, the implementation of such screening is needed to address patients' needs and to render the potential for rehabilitation more reliable. Ivyspring International Publisher 2017-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5556633/ /pubmed/28819367 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.19564 Text en © Ivyspring International Publisher This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Ture, Maria Angst, Felix Aeschlimann, André Renner, Christoph Schnyder, Ulrich Zerkiebel, Nic Perseus, Josef Barth, Jürgen Bredell, Marius Soelch, Chantal Martin Walt, Heinrich Jenewein, Josef Short-term effectiveness of inpatient cancer rehabilitation: A longitudinal controlled cohort study |
title | Short-term effectiveness of inpatient cancer rehabilitation: A longitudinal controlled cohort study |
title_full | Short-term effectiveness of inpatient cancer rehabilitation: A longitudinal controlled cohort study |
title_fullStr | Short-term effectiveness of inpatient cancer rehabilitation: A longitudinal controlled cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Short-term effectiveness of inpatient cancer rehabilitation: A longitudinal controlled cohort study |
title_short | Short-term effectiveness of inpatient cancer rehabilitation: A longitudinal controlled cohort study |
title_sort | short-term effectiveness of inpatient cancer rehabilitation: a longitudinal controlled cohort study |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5556633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28819367 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.19564 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT turemaria shorttermeffectivenessofinpatientcancerrehabilitationalongitudinalcontrolledcohortstudy AT angstfelix shorttermeffectivenessofinpatientcancerrehabilitationalongitudinalcontrolledcohortstudy AT aeschlimannandre shorttermeffectivenessofinpatientcancerrehabilitationalongitudinalcontrolledcohortstudy AT rennerchristoph shorttermeffectivenessofinpatientcancerrehabilitationalongitudinalcontrolledcohortstudy AT schnyderulrich shorttermeffectivenessofinpatientcancerrehabilitationalongitudinalcontrolledcohortstudy AT zerkiebelnic shorttermeffectivenessofinpatientcancerrehabilitationalongitudinalcontrolledcohortstudy AT perseusjosef shorttermeffectivenessofinpatientcancerrehabilitationalongitudinalcontrolledcohortstudy AT barthjurgen shorttermeffectivenessofinpatientcancerrehabilitationalongitudinalcontrolledcohortstudy AT bredellmarius shorttermeffectivenessofinpatientcancerrehabilitationalongitudinalcontrolledcohortstudy AT soelchchantalmartin shorttermeffectivenessofinpatientcancerrehabilitationalongitudinalcontrolledcohortstudy AT waltheinrich shorttermeffectivenessofinpatientcancerrehabilitationalongitudinalcontrolledcohortstudy AT jeneweinjosef shorttermeffectivenessofinpatientcancerrehabilitationalongitudinalcontrolledcohortstudy |