Cargando…

Short-term effectiveness of inpatient cancer rehabilitation: A longitudinal controlled cohort study

Background: Inpatient rehabilitation for cancer patients has been demonstrated to improve patients' health related quality of life (HRQoL) effectively. The purpose of this study was to compare changes in general health and HRQoL of cancer patients who were referred to inpatient rehabilitation (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ture, Maria, Angst, Felix, Aeschlimann, André, Renner, Christoph, Schnyder, Ulrich, Zerkiebel, Nic, Perseus, Josef, Barth, Jürgen, Bredell, Marius, Soelch, Chantal Martin, Walt, Heinrich, Jenewein, Josef
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5556633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28819367
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.19564
_version_ 1783257102252244992
author Ture, Maria
Angst, Felix
Aeschlimann, André
Renner, Christoph
Schnyder, Ulrich
Zerkiebel, Nic
Perseus, Josef
Barth, Jürgen
Bredell, Marius
Soelch, Chantal Martin
Walt, Heinrich
Jenewein, Josef
author_facet Ture, Maria
Angst, Felix
Aeschlimann, André
Renner, Christoph
Schnyder, Ulrich
Zerkiebel, Nic
Perseus, Josef
Barth, Jürgen
Bredell, Marius
Soelch, Chantal Martin
Walt, Heinrich
Jenewein, Josef
author_sort Ture, Maria
collection PubMed
description Background: Inpatient rehabilitation for cancer patients has been demonstrated to improve patients' health related quality of life (HRQoL) effectively. The purpose of this study was to compare changes in general health and HRQoL of cancer patients who were referred to inpatient rehabilitation (IR) with those in two control groups who underwent outpatient management either with advice for inpatient rehabilitation (A(+)) or without (A(-)). Methods: In this naturalistic, longitudinal, controlled cohort study, changes in general health and HRQoL were assessed at either discharge of acute hospital or start of rehabilitation (baseline) and at the follow-up 3 weeks later or end of rehabilitation. Outcome variables included general health and HRQoL assessed by the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT), and fatigue (FACT-F), depression and anxiety by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Changes on the scores were compared with bivariate and multivariate analyses using standardized mean differences (SMD). Results: IR patients (n=133) were on average older, reported lower HRQoL and health, and suffered more frequently from carcinoma than patients of the A(+) (n=30) and the A(-) (n=82) groups. In the IR patients, pain, physical functioning, mental health, vitality, and fatigue improved significantly compared to the A(+) controls. Compared to the A(- )group, the bivariate effects were lower but still statistically significant on many scales. Conclusions: IR showed moderate, statistically significant superior effects over outpatient management of cancer patients after acute treatment. Findings indicate that inpatient cancer rehabilitation can be recommended as an effective management after acute treatment. As today, referrals to inpatient rehabilitation for cancer patients are still not based on structured standardized procedures, the implementation of such screening is needed to address patients' needs and to render the potential for rehabilitation more reliable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5556633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Ivyspring International Publisher
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55566332017-08-17 Short-term effectiveness of inpatient cancer rehabilitation: A longitudinal controlled cohort study Ture, Maria Angst, Felix Aeschlimann, André Renner, Christoph Schnyder, Ulrich Zerkiebel, Nic Perseus, Josef Barth, Jürgen Bredell, Marius Soelch, Chantal Martin Walt, Heinrich Jenewein, Josef J Cancer Research Paper Background: Inpatient rehabilitation for cancer patients has been demonstrated to improve patients' health related quality of life (HRQoL) effectively. The purpose of this study was to compare changes in general health and HRQoL of cancer patients who were referred to inpatient rehabilitation (IR) with those in two control groups who underwent outpatient management either with advice for inpatient rehabilitation (A(+)) or without (A(-)). Methods: In this naturalistic, longitudinal, controlled cohort study, changes in general health and HRQoL were assessed at either discharge of acute hospital or start of rehabilitation (baseline) and at the follow-up 3 weeks later or end of rehabilitation. Outcome variables included general health and HRQoL assessed by the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT), and fatigue (FACT-F), depression and anxiety by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Changes on the scores were compared with bivariate and multivariate analyses using standardized mean differences (SMD). Results: IR patients (n=133) were on average older, reported lower HRQoL and health, and suffered more frequently from carcinoma than patients of the A(+) (n=30) and the A(-) (n=82) groups. In the IR patients, pain, physical functioning, mental health, vitality, and fatigue improved significantly compared to the A(+) controls. Compared to the A(- )group, the bivariate effects were lower but still statistically significant on many scales. Conclusions: IR showed moderate, statistically significant superior effects over outpatient management of cancer patients after acute treatment. Findings indicate that inpatient cancer rehabilitation can be recommended as an effective management after acute treatment. As today, referrals to inpatient rehabilitation for cancer patients are still not based on structured standardized procedures, the implementation of such screening is needed to address patients' needs and to render the potential for rehabilitation more reliable. Ivyspring International Publisher 2017-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5556633/ /pubmed/28819367 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.19564 Text en © Ivyspring International Publisher This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Ture, Maria
Angst, Felix
Aeschlimann, André
Renner, Christoph
Schnyder, Ulrich
Zerkiebel, Nic
Perseus, Josef
Barth, Jürgen
Bredell, Marius
Soelch, Chantal Martin
Walt, Heinrich
Jenewein, Josef
Short-term effectiveness of inpatient cancer rehabilitation: A longitudinal controlled cohort study
title Short-term effectiveness of inpatient cancer rehabilitation: A longitudinal controlled cohort study
title_full Short-term effectiveness of inpatient cancer rehabilitation: A longitudinal controlled cohort study
title_fullStr Short-term effectiveness of inpatient cancer rehabilitation: A longitudinal controlled cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Short-term effectiveness of inpatient cancer rehabilitation: A longitudinal controlled cohort study
title_short Short-term effectiveness of inpatient cancer rehabilitation: A longitudinal controlled cohort study
title_sort short-term effectiveness of inpatient cancer rehabilitation: a longitudinal controlled cohort study
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5556633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28819367
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.19564
work_keys_str_mv AT turemaria shorttermeffectivenessofinpatientcancerrehabilitationalongitudinalcontrolledcohortstudy
AT angstfelix shorttermeffectivenessofinpatientcancerrehabilitationalongitudinalcontrolledcohortstudy
AT aeschlimannandre shorttermeffectivenessofinpatientcancerrehabilitationalongitudinalcontrolledcohortstudy
AT rennerchristoph shorttermeffectivenessofinpatientcancerrehabilitationalongitudinalcontrolledcohortstudy
AT schnyderulrich shorttermeffectivenessofinpatientcancerrehabilitationalongitudinalcontrolledcohortstudy
AT zerkiebelnic shorttermeffectivenessofinpatientcancerrehabilitationalongitudinalcontrolledcohortstudy
AT perseusjosef shorttermeffectivenessofinpatientcancerrehabilitationalongitudinalcontrolledcohortstudy
AT barthjurgen shorttermeffectivenessofinpatientcancerrehabilitationalongitudinalcontrolledcohortstudy
AT bredellmarius shorttermeffectivenessofinpatientcancerrehabilitationalongitudinalcontrolledcohortstudy
AT soelchchantalmartin shorttermeffectivenessofinpatientcancerrehabilitationalongitudinalcontrolledcohortstudy
AT waltheinrich shorttermeffectivenessofinpatientcancerrehabilitationalongitudinalcontrolledcohortstudy
AT jeneweinjosef shorttermeffectivenessofinpatientcancerrehabilitationalongitudinalcontrolledcohortstudy