Cargando…
Reducing the socioeconomic gradient in uptake of the NHS bowel cancer screening Programme using a simplified supplementary information leaflet: a cluster-randomised trial
BACKGROUND: Uptake of colorectal cancer screening is low in the English NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP). Participation in screening is strongly associated with socioeconomic status. The aim of this study was to determine whether a supplementary leaflet providing the ‘gist’ of guaiac-base...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5556676/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28806955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3512-1 |
_version_ | 1783257112382537728 |
---|---|
author | Smith, Samuel G. Wardle, Jane Atkin, Wendy Raine, Rosalind McGregor, Lesley M. Vart, Gemma Morris, Steve Duffy, Stephen W. Moss, Susan Hackshaw, Allan Halloran, Stephen Kralj-Hans, Ines Howe, Rosemary Snowball, Julia Handley, Graham Logan, Richard F. Rainbow, Sandra Smith, Steve Thomas, Mary Counsell, Nicholas von Wagner, Christian |
author_facet | Smith, Samuel G. Wardle, Jane Atkin, Wendy Raine, Rosalind McGregor, Lesley M. Vart, Gemma Morris, Steve Duffy, Stephen W. Moss, Susan Hackshaw, Allan Halloran, Stephen Kralj-Hans, Ines Howe, Rosemary Snowball, Julia Handley, Graham Logan, Richard F. Rainbow, Sandra Smith, Steve Thomas, Mary Counsell, Nicholas von Wagner, Christian |
author_sort | Smith, Samuel G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Uptake of colorectal cancer screening is low in the English NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP). Participation in screening is strongly associated with socioeconomic status. The aim of this study was to determine whether a supplementary leaflet providing the ‘gist’ of guaiac-based Faecal Occult Blood test (gFOBt) screening for colorectal cancer could reduce the socioeconomic status (SES) gradient in uptake in the English NHS BCSP. METHODS: The trial was integrated within routine BCSP operations in November 2012. Using a cluster randomised controlled design all adults aged 59–74 years who were being routinely invited to complete the gFOBt were randomised based on day of invitation. The Index of Multiple Deprivation was used to create SES quintiles. The control group received the standard information booklet (‘SI’). The intervention group received the SI booklet and the Gist leaflet (‘SI + Gist’) which had been designed to help people with lower literacy engage with the invitation. Blinding of hubs was not possible and invited subjects were not made aware of a comparator condition. The primary outcome was the gradient in uptake across IMD quintiles. RESULTS: In November 2012, 163,525 individuals were allocated to either the ‘SI’ intervention (n = 79,104) or the ‘SI + Gist’ group (n = 84,421). Overall uptake was similar between the intervention and control groups (SI: 57.3% and SI + Gist: 57.6%; OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.92–1.13, p = 0.77). Uptake was 42.0% (SI) vs. 43.0% (SI + Gist) in the most deprived quintile and 65.6% vs. 65.8% in the least deprived quintile (interaction p = 0.48). The SES gradient in uptake was similar between the study groups within age, gender, hub and screening round sub-groups. CONCLUSIONS: Providing supplementary simplified information in addition to the standard information booklet did not reduce the SES gradient in uptake in the NHS BCSP. The effectiveness of the Gist leaflet when used alone should be explored in future research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN74121020, registered: 17/20/2012. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-017-3512-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5556676 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55566762017-08-16 Reducing the socioeconomic gradient in uptake of the NHS bowel cancer screening Programme using a simplified supplementary information leaflet: a cluster-randomised trial Smith, Samuel G. Wardle, Jane Atkin, Wendy Raine, Rosalind McGregor, Lesley M. Vart, Gemma Morris, Steve Duffy, Stephen W. Moss, Susan Hackshaw, Allan Halloran, Stephen Kralj-Hans, Ines Howe, Rosemary Snowball, Julia Handley, Graham Logan, Richard F. Rainbow, Sandra Smith, Steve Thomas, Mary Counsell, Nicholas von Wagner, Christian BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Uptake of colorectal cancer screening is low in the English NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP). Participation in screening is strongly associated with socioeconomic status. The aim of this study was to determine whether a supplementary leaflet providing the ‘gist’ of guaiac-based Faecal Occult Blood test (gFOBt) screening for colorectal cancer could reduce the socioeconomic status (SES) gradient in uptake in the English NHS BCSP. METHODS: The trial was integrated within routine BCSP operations in November 2012. Using a cluster randomised controlled design all adults aged 59–74 years who were being routinely invited to complete the gFOBt were randomised based on day of invitation. The Index of Multiple Deprivation was used to create SES quintiles. The control group received the standard information booklet (‘SI’). The intervention group received the SI booklet and the Gist leaflet (‘SI + Gist’) which had been designed to help people with lower literacy engage with the invitation. Blinding of hubs was not possible and invited subjects were not made aware of a comparator condition. The primary outcome was the gradient in uptake across IMD quintiles. RESULTS: In November 2012, 163,525 individuals were allocated to either the ‘SI’ intervention (n = 79,104) or the ‘SI + Gist’ group (n = 84,421). Overall uptake was similar between the intervention and control groups (SI: 57.3% and SI + Gist: 57.6%; OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.92–1.13, p = 0.77). Uptake was 42.0% (SI) vs. 43.0% (SI + Gist) in the most deprived quintile and 65.6% vs. 65.8% in the least deprived quintile (interaction p = 0.48). The SES gradient in uptake was similar between the study groups within age, gender, hub and screening round sub-groups. CONCLUSIONS: Providing supplementary simplified information in addition to the standard information booklet did not reduce the SES gradient in uptake in the NHS BCSP. The effectiveness of the Gist leaflet when used alone should be explored in future research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN74121020, registered: 17/20/2012. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-017-3512-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5556676/ /pubmed/28806955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3512-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Smith, Samuel G. Wardle, Jane Atkin, Wendy Raine, Rosalind McGregor, Lesley M. Vart, Gemma Morris, Steve Duffy, Stephen W. Moss, Susan Hackshaw, Allan Halloran, Stephen Kralj-Hans, Ines Howe, Rosemary Snowball, Julia Handley, Graham Logan, Richard F. Rainbow, Sandra Smith, Steve Thomas, Mary Counsell, Nicholas von Wagner, Christian Reducing the socioeconomic gradient in uptake of the NHS bowel cancer screening Programme using a simplified supplementary information leaflet: a cluster-randomised trial |
title | Reducing the socioeconomic gradient in uptake of the NHS bowel cancer screening Programme using a simplified supplementary information leaflet: a cluster-randomised trial |
title_full | Reducing the socioeconomic gradient in uptake of the NHS bowel cancer screening Programme using a simplified supplementary information leaflet: a cluster-randomised trial |
title_fullStr | Reducing the socioeconomic gradient in uptake of the NHS bowel cancer screening Programme using a simplified supplementary information leaflet: a cluster-randomised trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Reducing the socioeconomic gradient in uptake of the NHS bowel cancer screening Programme using a simplified supplementary information leaflet: a cluster-randomised trial |
title_short | Reducing the socioeconomic gradient in uptake of the NHS bowel cancer screening Programme using a simplified supplementary information leaflet: a cluster-randomised trial |
title_sort | reducing the socioeconomic gradient in uptake of the nhs bowel cancer screening programme using a simplified supplementary information leaflet: a cluster-randomised trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5556676/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28806955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3512-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithsamuelg reducingthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeofthenhsbowelcancerscreeningprogrammeusingasimplifiedsupplementaryinformationleafletaclusterrandomisedtrial AT wardlejane reducingthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeofthenhsbowelcancerscreeningprogrammeusingasimplifiedsupplementaryinformationleafletaclusterrandomisedtrial AT atkinwendy reducingthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeofthenhsbowelcancerscreeningprogrammeusingasimplifiedsupplementaryinformationleafletaclusterrandomisedtrial AT rainerosalind reducingthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeofthenhsbowelcancerscreeningprogrammeusingasimplifiedsupplementaryinformationleafletaclusterrandomisedtrial AT mcgregorlesleym reducingthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeofthenhsbowelcancerscreeningprogrammeusingasimplifiedsupplementaryinformationleafletaclusterrandomisedtrial AT vartgemma reducingthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeofthenhsbowelcancerscreeningprogrammeusingasimplifiedsupplementaryinformationleafletaclusterrandomisedtrial AT morrissteve reducingthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeofthenhsbowelcancerscreeningprogrammeusingasimplifiedsupplementaryinformationleafletaclusterrandomisedtrial AT duffystephenw reducingthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeofthenhsbowelcancerscreeningprogrammeusingasimplifiedsupplementaryinformationleafletaclusterrandomisedtrial AT mosssusan reducingthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeofthenhsbowelcancerscreeningprogrammeusingasimplifiedsupplementaryinformationleafletaclusterrandomisedtrial AT hackshawallan reducingthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeofthenhsbowelcancerscreeningprogrammeusingasimplifiedsupplementaryinformationleafletaclusterrandomisedtrial AT halloranstephen reducingthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeofthenhsbowelcancerscreeningprogrammeusingasimplifiedsupplementaryinformationleafletaclusterrandomisedtrial AT kraljhansines reducingthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeofthenhsbowelcancerscreeningprogrammeusingasimplifiedsupplementaryinformationleafletaclusterrandomisedtrial AT howerosemary reducingthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeofthenhsbowelcancerscreeningprogrammeusingasimplifiedsupplementaryinformationleafletaclusterrandomisedtrial AT snowballjulia reducingthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeofthenhsbowelcancerscreeningprogrammeusingasimplifiedsupplementaryinformationleafletaclusterrandomisedtrial AT handleygraham reducingthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeofthenhsbowelcancerscreeningprogrammeusingasimplifiedsupplementaryinformationleafletaclusterrandomisedtrial AT loganrichardf reducingthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeofthenhsbowelcancerscreeningprogrammeusingasimplifiedsupplementaryinformationleafletaclusterrandomisedtrial AT rainbowsandra reducingthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeofthenhsbowelcancerscreeningprogrammeusingasimplifiedsupplementaryinformationleafletaclusterrandomisedtrial AT smithsteve reducingthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeofthenhsbowelcancerscreeningprogrammeusingasimplifiedsupplementaryinformationleafletaclusterrandomisedtrial AT thomasmary reducingthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeofthenhsbowelcancerscreeningprogrammeusingasimplifiedsupplementaryinformationleafletaclusterrandomisedtrial AT counsellnicholas reducingthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeofthenhsbowelcancerscreeningprogrammeusingasimplifiedsupplementaryinformationleafletaclusterrandomisedtrial AT vonwagnerchristian reducingthesocioeconomicgradientinuptakeofthenhsbowelcancerscreeningprogrammeusingasimplifiedsupplementaryinformationleafletaclusterrandomisedtrial |