Cargando…

A role for random, humidity-dependent epiphytic growth prior to invasion of wheat by Zymoseptoria tritici

Zymoseptoria tritici causes Septoria leaf blotch of wheat. The prevailing paradigm of the Z. tritici-wheat interaction assumes fungal ingress through stomata within 24–48 h, followed by days of symptomless infection. This is extrapolated from studies testing the mode of fungal ingress under optimal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fones, Helen N., Eyles, Chris J., Kay, William, Cowper, Josh, Gurr, Sarah J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academic Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5556705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28694096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2017.07.002
_version_ 1783257113834815488
author Fones, Helen N.
Eyles, Chris J.
Kay, William
Cowper, Josh
Gurr, Sarah J.
author_facet Fones, Helen N.
Eyles, Chris J.
Kay, William
Cowper, Josh
Gurr, Sarah J.
author_sort Fones, Helen N.
collection PubMed
description Zymoseptoria tritici causes Septoria leaf blotch of wheat. The prevailing paradigm of the Z. tritici-wheat interaction assumes fungal ingress through stomata within 24–48 h, followed by days of symptomless infection. This is extrapolated from studies testing the mode of fungal ingress under optimal infection conditions. Here, we explicitly assess the timing of entry, using GFP-tagged Z. tritici. We show that early entry is comparatively rare, and extended epiphytic growth possible. We test the hypotheses that our data diverge from earlier studies due to: i. random ingress of Z. tritici into the leaf, with some early entry events; ii. previous reliance upon fungal stains, combined with poor attachment of Z. tritici to the leaf, leading to increased likelihood of observing internal versus external growth, compared to using GFP; iii. use of exceptionally high humidity to promote entry in previous studies. We combine computer simulation of leaf-surface growth with thousands of in planta observations to demonstrate that while spores germinate rapidly on the leaf, over 95% of fungi remain epiphytic, growing randomly over the leaf for ten days or more. We show that epiphytic fungi are easily detached from leaves by rinsing and that humidity promotes epiphytic growth, increasing infection rates. Together, these results explain why epiphytic growth has been dismissed and early ingress assumed. The prolonged epiphytic phase should inform studies of pathogenicity and virulence mutants, disease control strategies, and interpretation of the observed low in planta growth, metabolic quiescence and evasion of plant defences by Zymoseptoria during symptomless infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5556705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Academic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55567052017-09-01 A role for random, humidity-dependent epiphytic growth prior to invasion of wheat by Zymoseptoria tritici Fones, Helen N. Eyles, Chris J. Kay, William Cowper, Josh Gurr, Sarah J. Fungal Genet Biol Regular Articles Zymoseptoria tritici causes Septoria leaf blotch of wheat. The prevailing paradigm of the Z. tritici-wheat interaction assumes fungal ingress through stomata within 24–48 h, followed by days of symptomless infection. This is extrapolated from studies testing the mode of fungal ingress under optimal infection conditions. Here, we explicitly assess the timing of entry, using GFP-tagged Z. tritici. We show that early entry is comparatively rare, and extended epiphytic growth possible. We test the hypotheses that our data diverge from earlier studies due to: i. random ingress of Z. tritici into the leaf, with some early entry events; ii. previous reliance upon fungal stains, combined with poor attachment of Z. tritici to the leaf, leading to increased likelihood of observing internal versus external growth, compared to using GFP; iii. use of exceptionally high humidity to promote entry in previous studies. We combine computer simulation of leaf-surface growth with thousands of in planta observations to demonstrate that while spores germinate rapidly on the leaf, over 95% of fungi remain epiphytic, growing randomly over the leaf for ten days or more. We show that epiphytic fungi are easily detached from leaves by rinsing and that humidity promotes epiphytic growth, increasing infection rates. Together, these results explain why epiphytic growth has been dismissed and early ingress assumed. The prolonged epiphytic phase should inform studies of pathogenicity and virulence mutants, disease control strategies, and interpretation of the observed low in planta growth, metabolic quiescence and evasion of plant defences by Zymoseptoria during symptomless infection. Academic Press 2017-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5556705/ /pubmed/28694096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2017.07.002 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Regular Articles
Fones, Helen N.
Eyles, Chris J.
Kay, William
Cowper, Josh
Gurr, Sarah J.
A role for random, humidity-dependent epiphytic growth prior to invasion of wheat by Zymoseptoria tritici
title A role for random, humidity-dependent epiphytic growth prior to invasion of wheat by Zymoseptoria tritici
title_full A role for random, humidity-dependent epiphytic growth prior to invasion of wheat by Zymoseptoria tritici
title_fullStr A role for random, humidity-dependent epiphytic growth prior to invasion of wheat by Zymoseptoria tritici
title_full_unstemmed A role for random, humidity-dependent epiphytic growth prior to invasion of wheat by Zymoseptoria tritici
title_short A role for random, humidity-dependent epiphytic growth prior to invasion of wheat by Zymoseptoria tritici
title_sort role for random, humidity-dependent epiphytic growth prior to invasion of wheat by zymoseptoria tritici
topic Regular Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5556705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28694096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2017.07.002
work_keys_str_mv AT foneshelenn aroleforrandomhumiditydependentepiphyticgrowthpriortoinvasionofwheatbyzymoseptoriatritici
AT eyleschrisj aroleforrandomhumiditydependentepiphyticgrowthpriortoinvasionofwheatbyzymoseptoriatritici
AT kaywilliam aroleforrandomhumiditydependentepiphyticgrowthpriortoinvasionofwheatbyzymoseptoriatritici
AT cowperjosh aroleforrandomhumiditydependentepiphyticgrowthpriortoinvasionofwheatbyzymoseptoriatritici
AT gurrsarahj aroleforrandomhumiditydependentepiphyticgrowthpriortoinvasionofwheatbyzymoseptoriatritici
AT foneshelenn roleforrandomhumiditydependentepiphyticgrowthpriortoinvasionofwheatbyzymoseptoriatritici
AT eyleschrisj roleforrandomhumiditydependentepiphyticgrowthpriortoinvasionofwheatbyzymoseptoriatritici
AT kaywilliam roleforrandomhumiditydependentepiphyticgrowthpriortoinvasionofwheatbyzymoseptoriatritici
AT cowperjosh roleforrandomhumiditydependentepiphyticgrowthpriortoinvasionofwheatbyzymoseptoriatritici
AT gurrsarahj roleforrandomhumiditydependentepiphyticgrowthpriortoinvasionofwheatbyzymoseptoriatritici