Cargando…
A role for random, humidity-dependent epiphytic growth prior to invasion of wheat by Zymoseptoria tritici
Zymoseptoria tritici causes Septoria leaf blotch of wheat. The prevailing paradigm of the Z. tritici-wheat interaction assumes fungal ingress through stomata within 24–48 h, followed by days of symptomless infection. This is extrapolated from studies testing the mode of fungal ingress under optimal...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Academic Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5556705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28694096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2017.07.002 |
_version_ | 1783257113834815488 |
---|---|
author | Fones, Helen N. Eyles, Chris J. Kay, William Cowper, Josh Gurr, Sarah J. |
author_facet | Fones, Helen N. Eyles, Chris J. Kay, William Cowper, Josh Gurr, Sarah J. |
author_sort | Fones, Helen N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Zymoseptoria tritici causes Septoria leaf blotch of wheat. The prevailing paradigm of the Z. tritici-wheat interaction assumes fungal ingress through stomata within 24–48 h, followed by days of symptomless infection. This is extrapolated from studies testing the mode of fungal ingress under optimal infection conditions. Here, we explicitly assess the timing of entry, using GFP-tagged Z. tritici. We show that early entry is comparatively rare, and extended epiphytic growth possible. We test the hypotheses that our data diverge from earlier studies due to: i. random ingress of Z. tritici into the leaf, with some early entry events; ii. previous reliance upon fungal stains, combined with poor attachment of Z. tritici to the leaf, leading to increased likelihood of observing internal versus external growth, compared to using GFP; iii. use of exceptionally high humidity to promote entry in previous studies. We combine computer simulation of leaf-surface growth with thousands of in planta observations to demonstrate that while spores germinate rapidly on the leaf, over 95% of fungi remain epiphytic, growing randomly over the leaf for ten days or more. We show that epiphytic fungi are easily detached from leaves by rinsing and that humidity promotes epiphytic growth, increasing infection rates. Together, these results explain why epiphytic growth has been dismissed and early ingress assumed. The prolonged epiphytic phase should inform studies of pathogenicity and virulence mutants, disease control strategies, and interpretation of the observed low in planta growth, metabolic quiescence and evasion of plant defences by Zymoseptoria during symptomless infection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5556705 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Academic Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55567052017-09-01 A role for random, humidity-dependent epiphytic growth prior to invasion of wheat by Zymoseptoria tritici Fones, Helen N. Eyles, Chris J. Kay, William Cowper, Josh Gurr, Sarah J. Fungal Genet Biol Regular Articles Zymoseptoria tritici causes Septoria leaf blotch of wheat. The prevailing paradigm of the Z. tritici-wheat interaction assumes fungal ingress through stomata within 24–48 h, followed by days of symptomless infection. This is extrapolated from studies testing the mode of fungal ingress under optimal infection conditions. Here, we explicitly assess the timing of entry, using GFP-tagged Z. tritici. We show that early entry is comparatively rare, and extended epiphytic growth possible. We test the hypotheses that our data diverge from earlier studies due to: i. random ingress of Z. tritici into the leaf, with some early entry events; ii. previous reliance upon fungal stains, combined with poor attachment of Z. tritici to the leaf, leading to increased likelihood of observing internal versus external growth, compared to using GFP; iii. use of exceptionally high humidity to promote entry in previous studies. We combine computer simulation of leaf-surface growth with thousands of in planta observations to demonstrate that while spores germinate rapidly on the leaf, over 95% of fungi remain epiphytic, growing randomly over the leaf for ten days or more. We show that epiphytic fungi are easily detached from leaves by rinsing and that humidity promotes epiphytic growth, increasing infection rates. Together, these results explain why epiphytic growth has been dismissed and early ingress assumed. The prolonged epiphytic phase should inform studies of pathogenicity and virulence mutants, disease control strategies, and interpretation of the observed low in planta growth, metabolic quiescence and evasion of plant defences by Zymoseptoria during symptomless infection. Academic Press 2017-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5556705/ /pubmed/28694096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2017.07.002 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Regular Articles Fones, Helen N. Eyles, Chris J. Kay, William Cowper, Josh Gurr, Sarah J. A role for random, humidity-dependent epiphytic growth prior to invasion of wheat by Zymoseptoria tritici |
title | A role for random, humidity-dependent epiphytic growth prior to invasion of wheat by Zymoseptoria tritici |
title_full | A role for random, humidity-dependent epiphytic growth prior to invasion of wheat by Zymoseptoria tritici |
title_fullStr | A role for random, humidity-dependent epiphytic growth prior to invasion of wheat by Zymoseptoria tritici |
title_full_unstemmed | A role for random, humidity-dependent epiphytic growth prior to invasion of wheat by Zymoseptoria tritici |
title_short | A role for random, humidity-dependent epiphytic growth prior to invasion of wheat by Zymoseptoria tritici |
title_sort | role for random, humidity-dependent epiphytic growth prior to invasion of wheat by zymoseptoria tritici |
topic | Regular Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5556705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28694096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2017.07.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT foneshelenn aroleforrandomhumiditydependentepiphyticgrowthpriortoinvasionofwheatbyzymoseptoriatritici AT eyleschrisj aroleforrandomhumiditydependentepiphyticgrowthpriortoinvasionofwheatbyzymoseptoriatritici AT kaywilliam aroleforrandomhumiditydependentepiphyticgrowthpriortoinvasionofwheatbyzymoseptoriatritici AT cowperjosh aroleforrandomhumiditydependentepiphyticgrowthpriortoinvasionofwheatbyzymoseptoriatritici AT gurrsarahj aroleforrandomhumiditydependentepiphyticgrowthpriortoinvasionofwheatbyzymoseptoriatritici AT foneshelenn roleforrandomhumiditydependentepiphyticgrowthpriortoinvasionofwheatbyzymoseptoriatritici AT eyleschrisj roleforrandomhumiditydependentepiphyticgrowthpriortoinvasionofwheatbyzymoseptoriatritici AT kaywilliam roleforrandomhumiditydependentepiphyticgrowthpriortoinvasionofwheatbyzymoseptoriatritici AT cowperjosh roleforrandomhumiditydependentepiphyticgrowthpriortoinvasionofwheatbyzymoseptoriatritici AT gurrsarahj roleforrandomhumiditydependentepiphyticgrowthpriortoinvasionofwheatbyzymoseptoriatritici |