Cargando…

Silicone Implant-Based Paranasal Augmentation for Mild Midface Concavity

BACKGROUND: Midface concavity is a relatively common facial feature in East Asian populations. Paranasal augmentation is becoming an increasingly popular procedure for patients with mild concavity and normal occlusion. In this study, we evaluate clinical outcomes following a series of paranasal augm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Joo Hyun, Jung, Min Su, Lee, Byeong Ho, Jeong, Hii Sun, Suh, In Suck, Ahn, Duk Kyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5556717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28913247
http://dx.doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2016.17.1.20
_version_ 1783257116884074496
author Kim, Joo Hyun
Jung, Min Su
Lee, Byeong Ho
Jeong, Hii Sun
Suh, In Suck
Ahn, Duk Kyun
author_facet Kim, Joo Hyun
Jung, Min Su
Lee, Byeong Ho
Jeong, Hii Sun
Suh, In Suck
Ahn, Duk Kyun
author_sort Kim, Joo Hyun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Midface concavity is a relatively common facial feature in East Asian populations. Paranasal augmentation is becoming an increasingly popular procedure for patients with mild concavity and normal occlusion. In this study, we evaluate clinical outcomes following a series of paranasal augmentation. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed for patients with Class I occlusion who had undergone bilateral paranasal augmentation using custom-made silicone implants, between October 2005 and September 2013. Patient charts were reviewed for demographic information, concomitant operations, and postoperative complications. Preoperative and postoperative (1-month) photographs were used to evaluate operative outcome. RESULTS: The review identified a total of 93 patients meeting study criteria. Overall, aesthetic outcomes were satisfactory. Five-millimeter thick silicone implant was used in 81 cases, and the mean augmentation was 4.26 mm for this thickness. Among the 93 patients, 2 patients required immediate implant removal due to discomfort. An additional 3 patients experienced implant migration without any extrusion. Nine patients complained of transient paresthesia, which had resolved by 2 weeks. There were no cases of hematoma or infection. All patients reported improvement in their lateral profile and were pleased at follow-up. Complications that arose postoperatively included 9 cases of numbness in the upper lip and 3 cases of implant migration. All cases yielded satisfactory results without persisting complications. Sensations were fully restored postoperatively after 1 to 2 weeks. CONCLUSION: Paranasal augmentation with custom-made silicone implants is a simple, safe, and inexpensive method that can readily improve the lateral profile of a patient with normal occlusion. When combined with other aesthetic procedures, paranasal augmentation can synergistically improve outcome and lead to greater patient satisfaction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5556717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55567172017-09-14 Silicone Implant-Based Paranasal Augmentation for Mild Midface Concavity Kim, Joo Hyun Jung, Min Su Lee, Byeong Ho Jeong, Hii Sun Suh, In Suck Ahn, Duk Kyun Arch Craniofac Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Midface concavity is a relatively common facial feature in East Asian populations. Paranasal augmentation is becoming an increasingly popular procedure for patients with mild concavity and normal occlusion. In this study, we evaluate clinical outcomes following a series of paranasal augmentation. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed for patients with Class I occlusion who had undergone bilateral paranasal augmentation using custom-made silicone implants, between October 2005 and September 2013. Patient charts were reviewed for demographic information, concomitant operations, and postoperative complications. Preoperative and postoperative (1-month) photographs were used to evaluate operative outcome. RESULTS: The review identified a total of 93 patients meeting study criteria. Overall, aesthetic outcomes were satisfactory. Five-millimeter thick silicone implant was used in 81 cases, and the mean augmentation was 4.26 mm for this thickness. Among the 93 patients, 2 patients required immediate implant removal due to discomfort. An additional 3 patients experienced implant migration without any extrusion. Nine patients complained of transient paresthesia, which had resolved by 2 weeks. There were no cases of hematoma or infection. All patients reported improvement in their lateral profile and were pleased at follow-up. Complications that arose postoperatively included 9 cases of numbness in the upper lip and 3 cases of implant migration. All cases yielded satisfactory results without persisting complications. Sensations were fully restored postoperatively after 1 to 2 weeks. CONCLUSION: Paranasal augmentation with custom-made silicone implants is a simple, safe, and inexpensive method that can readily improve the lateral profile of a patient with normal occlusion. When combined with other aesthetic procedures, paranasal augmentation can synergistically improve outcome and lead to greater patient satisfaction. The Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association 2016-03 2016-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5556717/ /pubmed/28913247 http://dx.doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2016.17.1.20 Text en © 2016 The Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Joo Hyun
Jung, Min Su
Lee, Byeong Ho
Jeong, Hii Sun
Suh, In Suck
Ahn, Duk Kyun
Silicone Implant-Based Paranasal Augmentation for Mild Midface Concavity
title Silicone Implant-Based Paranasal Augmentation for Mild Midface Concavity
title_full Silicone Implant-Based Paranasal Augmentation for Mild Midface Concavity
title_fullStr Silicone Implant-Based Paranasal Augmentation for Mild Midface Concavity
title_full_unstemmed Silicone Implant-Based Paranasal Augmentation for Mild Midface Concavity
title_short Silicone Implant-Based Paranasal Augmentation for Mild Midface Concavity
title_sort silicone implant-based paranasal augmentation for mild midface concavity
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5556717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28913247
http://dx.doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2016.17.1.20
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjoohyun siliconeimplantbasedparanasalaugmentationformildmidfaceconcavity
AT jungminsu siliconeimplantbasedparanasalaugmentationformildmidfaceconcavity
AT leebyeongho siliconeimplantbasedparanasalaugmentationformildmidfaceconcavity
AT jeonghiisun siliconeimplantbasedparanasalaugmentationformildmidfaceconcavity
AT suhinsuck siliconeimplantbasedparanasalaugmentationformildmidfaceconcavity
AT ahndukkyun siliconeimplantbasedparanasalaugmentationformildmidfaceconcavity