Cargando…

Impact of inpatient Care in Emergency Department on outcomes: a quasi-experimental cohort study

BACKGROUND: Hospitals around the world are faced with the issue of boarders in emergency department (ED), patients marked for admission but with no available inpatient bed. Boarder status is known to be associated with delayed inpatient care and suboptimal outcomes. A new care delivery system was de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lateef, Aisha, Lee, Soo Hoon, Fisher, Dale Andrew, Goh, Wei-Ping, Han, Hui Fen, Segara, Uma Chandra, Sim, Tiong Beng, Mahadehvan, Malcolm, Goh, Khean Teik, Cheah, Noel, Lim, Aymeric YT, Phan, Phillip H., Merchant, Reshma A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5557060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28806942
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2491-x
_version_ 1783257157525831680
author Lateef, Aisha
Lee, Soo Hoon
Fisher, Dale Andrew
Goh, Wei-Ping
Han, Hui Fen
Segara, Uma Chandra
Sim, Tiong Beng
Mahadehvan, Malcolm
Goh, Khean Teik
Cheah, Noel
Lim, Aymeric YT
Phan, Phillip H.
Merchant, Reshma A
author_facet Lateef, Aisha
Lee, Soo Hoon
Fisher, Dale Andrew
Goh, Wei-Ping
Han, Hui Fen
Segara, Uma Chandra
Sim, Tiong Beng
Mahadehvan, Malcolm
Goh, Khean Teik
Cheah, Noel
Lim, Aymeric YT
Phan, Phillip H.
Merchant, Reshma A
author_sort Lateef, Aisha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hospitals around the world are faced with the issue of boarders in emergency department (ED), patients marked for admission but with no available inpatient bed. Boarder status is known to be associated with delayed inpatient care and suboptimal outcomes. A new care delivery system was developed in our institution where boarders received full inpatient care from a designated medical team, acute medical team (AMT), while still residing at ED. The current study examines the impact of this AMT intervention on patient outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective quasi-experimental cohort study to analyze outcomes between the AMT intervention and conventional care in a 1250-bed acute care tertiary academic hospital in Singapore. Study participants included patients who received care from the AMT, a matched cohort of patients admitted directly to inpatient wards (non-AMT) and a sample of patients prior to the intervention (pre-AMT group). Primary outcomes were length of hospital stay (LOS), early discharges (within 24 h) and bed placement. Secondary outcomes included unplanned readmissions within 3 months, and patient’s bill size. χ2- and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to test for differences between the cohorts on dichotomous and continuous variables respectively. RESULTS: The sample comprised of 2279 patients (1092 in AMT, 1027 in non-AMT, and 160 in pre-AMT groups). Higher rates of early discharge (without significant differences in the readmission rates) and shorter LOS were noted for the AMT patients. They were also more likely to be admitted into a ward allocated to their discipline and had lower bill size compared to non AMT patients. CONCLUSIONS: The AMT intervention improved patient outcomes and resource utilization. This model was noted to be sustainable and provides a potential solution for hospitals’ ED boarders who face a gap in inpatient care during their crucial first few hours of admissions while waiting for an inpatient bed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2491-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5557060
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55570602017-08-16 Impact of inpatient Care in Emergency Department on outcomes: a quasi-experimental cohort study Lateef, Aisha Lee, Soo Hoon Fisher, Dale Andrew Goh, Wei-Ping Han, Hui Fen Segara, Uma Chandra Sim, Tiong Beng Mahadehvan, Malcolm Goh, Khean Teik Cheah, Noel Lim, Aymeric YT Phan, Phillip H. Merchant, Reshma A BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Hospitals around the world are faced with the issue of boarders in emergency department (ED), patients marked for admission but with no available inpatient bed. Boarder status is known to be associated with delayed inpatient care and suboptimal outcomes. A new care delivery system was developed in our institution where boarders received full inpatient care from a designated medical team, acute medical team (AMT), while still residing at ED. The current study examines the impact of this AMT intervention on patient outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective quasi-experimental cohort study to analyze outcomes between the AMT intervention and conventional care in a 1250-bed acute care tertiary academic hospital in Singapore. Study participants included patients who received care from the AMT, a matched cohort of patients admitted directly to inpatient wards (non-AMT) and a sample of patients prior to the intervention (pre-AMT group). Primary outcomes were length of hospital stay (LOS), early discharges (within 24 h) and bed placement. Secondary outcomes included unplanned readmissions within 3 months, and patient’s bill size. χ2- and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to test for differences between the cohorts on dichotomous and continuous variables respectively. RESULTS: The sample comprised of 2279 patients (1092 in AMT, 1027 in non-AMT, and 160 in pre-AMT groups). Higher rates of early discharge (without significant differences in the readmission rates) and shorter LOS were noted for the AMT patients. They were also more likely to be admitted into a ward allocated to their discipline and had lower bill size compared to non AMT patients. CONCLUSIONS: The AMT intervention improved patient outcomes and resource utilization. This model was noted to be sustainable and provides a potential solution for hospitals’ ED boarders who face a gap in inpatient care during their crucial first few hours of admissions while waiting for an inpatient bed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2491-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5557060/ /pubmed/28806942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2491-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lateef, Aisha
Lee, Soo Hoon
Fisher, Dale Andrew
Goh, Wei-Ping
Han, Hui Fen
Segara, Uma Chandra
Sim, Tiong Beng
Mahadehvan, Malcolm
Goh, Khean Teik
Cheah, Noel
Lim, Aymeric YT
Phan, Phillip H.
Merchant, Reshma A
Impact of inpatient Care in Emergency Department on outcomes: a quasi-experimental cohort study
title Impact of inpatient Care in Emergency Department on outcomes: a quasi-experimental cohort study
title_full Impact of inpatient Care in Emergency Department on outcomes: a quasi-experimental cohort study
title_fullStr Impact of inpatient Care in Emergency Department on outcomes: a quasi-experimental cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of inpatient Care in Emergency Department on outcomes: a quasi-experimental cohort study
title_short Impact of inpatient Care in Emergency Department on outcomes: a quasi-experimental cohort study
title_sort impact of inpatient care in emergency department on outcomes: a quasi-experimental cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5557060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28806942
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2491-x
work_keys_str_mv AT lateefaisha impactofinpatientcareinemergencydepartmentonoutcomesaquasiexperimentalcohortstudy
AT leesoohoon impactofinpatientcareinemergencydepartmentonoutcomesaquasiexperimentalcohortstudy
AT fisherdaleandrew impactofinpatientcareinemergencydepartmentonoutcomesaquasiexperimentalcohortstudy
AT gohweiping impactofinpatientcareinemergencydepartmentonoutcomesaquasiexperimentalcohortstudy
AT hanhuifen impactofinpatientcareinemergencydepartmentonoutcomesaquasiexperimentalcohortstudy
AT segaraumachandra impactofinpatientcareinemergencydepartmentonoutcomesaquasiexperimentalcohortstudy
AT simtiongbeng impactofinpatientcareinemergencydepartmentonoutcomesaquasiexperimentalcohortstudy
AT mahadehvanmalcolm impactofinpatientcareinemergencydepartmentonoutcomesaquasiexperimentalcohortstudy
AT gohkheanteik impactofinpatientcareinemergencydepartmentonoutcomesaquasiexperimentalcohortstudy
AT cheahnoel impactofinpatientcareinemergencydepartmentonoutcomesaquasiexperimentalcohortstudy
AT limaymericyt impactofinpatientcareinemergencydepartmentonoutcomesaquasiexperimentalcohortstudy
AT phanphilliph impactofinpatientcareinemergencydepartmentonoutcomesaquasiexperimentalcohortstudy
AT merchantreshmaa impactofinpatientcareinemergencydepartmentonoutcomesaquasiexperimentalcohortstudy