Cargando…
Impact of inpatient Care in Emergency Department on outcomes: a quasi-experimental cohort study
BACKGROUND: Hospitals around the world are faced with the issue of boarders in emergency department (ED), patients marked for admission but with no available inpatient bed. Boarder status is known to be associated with delayed inpatient care and suboptimal outcomes. A new care delivery system was de...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5557060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28806942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2491-x |
_version_ | 1783257157525831680 |
---|---|
author | Lateef, Aisha Lee, Soo Hoon Fisher, Dale Andrew Goh, Wei-Ping Han, Hui Fen Segara, Uma Chandra Sim, Tiong Beng Mahadehvan, Malcolm Goh, Khean Teik Cheah, Noel Lim, Aymeric YT Phan, Phillip H. Merchant, Reshma A |
author_facet | Lateef, Aisha Lee, Soo Hoon Fisher, Dale Andrew Goh, Wei-Ping Han, Hui Fen Segara, Uma Chandra Sim, Tiong Beng Mahadehvan, Malcolm Goh, Khean Teik Cheah, Noel Lim, Aymeric YT Phan, Phillip H. Merchant, Reshma A |
author_sort | Lateef, Aisha |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Hospitals around the world are faced with the issue of boarders in emergency department (ED), patients marked for admission but with no available inpatient bed. Boarder status is known to be associated with delayed inpatient care and suboptimal outcomes. A new care delivery system was developed in our institution where boarders received full inpatient care from a designated medical team, acute medical team (AMT), while still residing at ED. The current study examines the impact of this AMT intervention on patient outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective quasi-experimental cohort study to analyze outcomes between the AMT intervention and conventional care in a 1250-bed acute care tertiary academic hospital in Singapore. Study participants included patients who received care from the AMT, a matched cohort of patients admitted directly to inpatient wards (non-AMT) and a sample of patients prior to the intervention (pre-AMT group). Primary outcomes were length of hospital stay (LOS), early discharges (within 24 h) and bed placement. Secondary outcomes included unplanned readmissions within 3 months, and patient’s bill size. χ2- and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to test for differences between the cohorts on dichotomous and continuous variables respectively. RESULTS: The sample comprised of 2279 patients (1092 in AMT, 1027 in non-AMT, and 160 in pre-AMT groups). Higher rates of early discharge (without significant differences in the readmission rates) and shorter LOS were noted for the AMT patients. They were also more likely to be admitted into a ward allocated to their discipline and had lower bill size compared to non AMT patients. CONCLUSIONS: The AMT intervention improved patient outcomes and resource utilization. This model was noted to be sustainable and provides a potential solution for hospitals’ ED boarders who face a gap in inpatient care during their crucial first few hours of admissions while waiting for an inpatient bed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2491-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5557060 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55570602017-08-16 Impact of inpatient Care in Emergency Department on outcomes: a quasi-experimental cohort study Lateef, Aisha Lee, Soo Hoon Fisher, Dale Andrew Goh, Wei-Ping Han, Hui Fen Segara, Uma Chandra Sim, Tiong Beng Mahadehvan, Malcolm Goh, Khean Teik Cheah, Noel Lim, Aymeric YT Phan, Phillip H. Merchant, Reshma A BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Hospitals around the world are faced with the issue of boarders in emergency department (ED), patients marked for admission but with no available inpatient bed. Boarder status is known to be associated with delayed inpatient care and suboptimal outcomes. A new care delivery system was developed in our institution where boarders received full inpatient care from a designated medical team, acute medical team (AMT), while still residing at ED. The current study examines the impact of this AMT intervention on patient outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective quasi-experimental cohort study to analyze outcomes between the AMT intervention and conventional care in a 1250-bed acute care tertiary academic hospital in Singapore. Study participants included patients who received care from the AMT, a matched cohort of patients admitted directly to inpatient wards (non-AMT) and a sample of patients prior to the intervention (pre-AMT group). Primary outcomes were length of hospital stay (LOS), early discharges (within 24 h) and bed placement. Secondary outcomes included unplanned readmissions within 3 months, and patient’s bill size. χ2- and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to test for differences between the cohorts on dichotomous and continuous variables respectively. RESULTS: The sample comprised of 2279 patients (1092 in AMT, 1027 in non-AMT, and 160 in pre-AMT groups). Higher rates of early discharge (without significant differences in the readmission rates) and shorter LOS were noted for the AMT patients. They were also more likely to be admitted into a ward allocated to their discipline and had lower bill size compared to non AMT patients. CONCLUSIONS: The AMT intervention improved patient outcomes and resource utilization. This model was noted to be sustainable and provides a potential solution for hospitals’ ED boarders who face a gap in inpatient care during their crucial first few hours of admissions while waiting for an inpatient bed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2491-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5557060/ /pubmed/28806942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2491-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lateef, Aisha Lee, Soo Hoon Fisher, Dale Andrew Goh, Wei-Ping Han, Hui Fen Segara, Uma Chandra Sim, Tiong Beng Mahadehvan, Malcolm Goh, Khean Teik Cheah, Noel Lim, Aymeric YT Phan, Phillip H. Merchant, Reshma A Impact of inpatient Care in Emergency Department on outcomes: a quasi-experimental cohort study |
title | Impact of inpatient Care in Emergency Department on outcomes: a quasi-experimental cohort study |
title_full | Impact of inpatient Care in Emergency Department on outcomes: a quasi-experimental cohort study |
title_fullStr | Impact of inpatient Care in Emergency Department on outcomes: a quasi-experimental cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of inpatient Care in Emergency Department on outcomes: a quasi-experimental cohort study |
title_short | Impact of inpatient Care in Emergency Department on outcomes: a quasi-experimental cohort study |
title_sort | impact of inpatient care in emergency department on outcomes: a quasi-experimental cohort study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5557060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28806942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2491-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lateefaisha impactofinpatientcareinemergencydepartmentonoutcomesaquasiexperimentalcohortstudy AT leesoohoon impactofinpatientcareinemergencydepartmentonoutcomesaquasiexperimentalcohortstudy AT fisherdaleandrew impactofinpatientcareinemergencydepartmentonoutcomesaquasiexperimentalcohortstudy AT gohweiping impactofinpatientcareinemergencydepartmentonoutcomesaquasiexperimentalcohortstudy AT hanhuifen impactofinpatientcareinemergencydepartmentonoutcomesaquasiexperimentalcohortstudy AT segaraumachandra impactofinpatientcareinemergencydepartmentonoutcomesaquasiexperimentalcohortstudy AT simtiongbeng impactofinpatientcareinemergencydepartmentonoutcomesaquasiexperimentalcohortstudy AT mahadehvanmalcolm impactofinpatientcareinemergencydepartmentonoutcomesaquasiexperimentalcohortstudy AT gohkheanteik impactofinpatientcareinemergencydepartmentonoutcomesaquasiexperimentalcohortstudy AT cheahnoel impactofinpatientcareinemergencydepartmentonoutcomesaquasiexperimentalcohortstudy AT limaymericyt impactofinpatientcareinemergencydepartmentonoutcomesaquasiexperimentalcohortstudy AT phanphilliph impactofinpatientcareinemergencydepartmentonoutcomesaquasiexperimentalcohortstudy AT merchantreshmaa impactofinpatientcareinemergencydepartmentonoutcomesaquasiexperimentalcohortstudy |