Cargando…

Software-guided versus nurse-directed blood glucose control in critically ill patients: the LOGIC-2 multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Blood glucose control in the intensive care unit (ICU) has the potential to save lives. However, maintaining blood glucose concentrations within a chosen target range is difficult in clinical practice and holds risk of potentially harmful hypoglycemia. Clinically validated computer algor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dubois, Jasperina, Van Herpe, Tom, van Hooijdonk, Roosmarijn T., Wouters, Ruben, Coart, Domien, Wouters, Pieter, Van Assche, Aimé, Veraghtert, Guy, De Moor, Bart, Wauters, Joost, Wilmer, Alexander, Schultz, Marcus J., Van den Berghe, Greet, Mesotten, Dieter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5557320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28806982
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1799-6
_version_ 1783257192147714048
author Dubois, Jasperina
Van Herpe, Tom
van Hooijdonk, Roosmarijn T.
Wouters, Ruben
Coart, Domien
Wouters, Pieter
Van Assche, Aimé
Veraghtert, Guy
De Moor, Bart
Wauters, Joost
Wilmer, Alexander
Schultz, Marcus J.
Van den Berghe, Greet
Mesotten, Dieter
author_facet Dubois, Jasperina
Van Herpe, Tom
van Hooijdonk, Roosmarijn T.
Wouters, Ruben
Coart, Domien
Wouters, Pieter
Van Assche, Aimé
Veraghtert, Guy
De Moor, Bart
Wauters, Joost
Wilmer, Alexander
Schultz, Marcus J.
Van den Berghe, Greet
Mesotten, Dieter
author_sort Dubois, Jasperina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Blood glucose control in the intensive care unit (ICU) has the potential to save lives. However, maintaining blood glucose concentrations within a chosen target range is difficult in clinical practice and holds risk of potentially harmful hypoglycemia. Clinically validated computer algorithms to guide insulin dosing by nurses have been advocated for better and safer blood glucose control. METHODS: We conducted an international, multicenter, randomized controlled trial involving 1550 adult, medical and surgical critically ill patients, requiring blood glucose control. Patients were randomly assigned to algorithm-guided blood glucose control (LOGIC-C, n = 777) or blood glucose control by trained nurses (Nurse-C, n = 773) during ICU stay, according to the local target range (80–110 mg/dL or 90–145 mg/dL). The primary outcome measure was the quality of blood glucose control, assessed by the glycemic penalty index (GPI), a measure that penalizes hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic deviations from the chosen target range. Incidence of severe hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dL) was the main safety outcome measure. New infections in ICU, duration of hospital stay, landmark 90-day mortality and quality of life were clinical safety outcome measures. RESULTS: The median GPI was lower in the LOGIC-C (10.8 IQR 6.2–16.1) than in the Nurse-C group (17.1 IQR 10.6–26.2) (P < 0.001). Mean blood glucose was 111 mg/dL (SD 15) in LOCIC-C versus 119 mg/dL (SD 21) in Nurse-C, whereas the median time-in-target range was 67.0% (IQR 52.1–80.1) in LOGIC-C versus 47.1% (IQR 28.1–65.0) in the Nurse-C group (both P < 0.001). The fraction of patients with severe hypoglycemia did not differ between LOGIC-C (0.9%) and Nurse-C (1.2%) (P = 0.6). The clinical safety outcomes did not differ between groups. The sampling interval was 2.3 h (SD 0.5) in the LOGIC-C group versus 3.0 h (SD 0.8) in the Nurse-C group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized controlled trial of a mixed critically ill patient population, the use of the LOGIC-Insulin blood glucose control algorithm, compared with blood glucose control by expert nurses, improved the quality of blood glucose control without increasing hypoglycemia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02056353. Registered on 4 February 2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-017-1799-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5557320
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55573202017-08-16 Software-guided versus nurse-directed blood glucose control in critically ill patients: the LOGIC-2 multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial Dubois, Jasperina Van Herpe, Tom van Hooijdonk, Roosmarijn T. Wouters, Ruben Coart, Domien Wouters, Pieter Van Assche, Aimé Veraghtert, Guy De Moor, Bart Wauters, Joost Wilmer, Alexander Schultz, Marcus J. Van den Berghe, Greet Mesotten, Dieter Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Blood glucose control in the intensive care unit (ICU) has the potential to save lives. However, maintaining blood glucose concentrations within a chosen target range is difficult in clinical practice and holds risk of potentially harmful hypoglycemia. Clinically validated computer algorithms to guide insulin dosing by nurses have been advocated for better and safer blood glucose control. METHODS: We conducted an international, multicenter, randomized controlled trial involving 1550 adult, medical and surgical critically ill patients, requiring blood glucose control. Patients were randomly assigned to algorithm-guided blood glucose control (LOGIC-C, n = 777) or blood glucose control by trained nurses (Nurse-C, n = 773) during ICU stay, according to the local target range (80–110 mg/dL or 90–145 mg/dL). The primary outcome measure was the quality of blood glucose control, assessed by the glycemic penalty index (GPI), a measure that penalizes hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic deviations from the chosen target range. Incidence of severe hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dL) was the main safety outcome measure. New infections in ICU, duration of hospital stay, landmark 90-day mortality and quality of life were clinical safety outcome measures. RESULTS: The median GPI was lower in the LOGIC-C (10.8 IQR 6.2–16.1) than in the Nurse-C group (17.1 IQR 10.6–26.2) (P < 0.001). Mean blood glucose was 111 mg/dL (SD 15) in LOCIC-C versus 119 mg/dL (SD 21) in Nurse-C, whereas the median time-in-target range was 67.0% (IQR 52.1–80.1) in LOGIC-C versus 47.1% (IQR 28.1–65.0) in the Nurse-C group (both P < 0.001). The fraction of patients with severe hypoglycemia did not differ between LOGIC-C (0.9%) and Nurse-C (1.2%) (P = 0.6). The clinical safety outcomes did not differ between groups. The sampling interval was 2.3 h (SD 0.5) in the LOGIC-C group versus 3.0 h (SD 0.8) in the Nurse-C group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized controlled trial of a mixed critically ill patient population, the use of the LOGIC-Insulin blood glucose control algorithm, compared with blood glucose control by expert nurses, improved the quality of blood glucose control without increasing hypoglycemia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02056353. Registered on 4 February 2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-017-1799-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5557320/ /pubmed/28806982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1799-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Dubois, Jasperina
Van Herpe, Tom
van Hooijdonk, Roosmarijn T.
Wouters, Ruben
Coart, Domien
Wouters, Pieter
Van Assche, Aimé
Veraghtert, Guy
De Moor, Bart
Wauters, Joost
Wilmer, Alexander
Schultz, Marcus J.
Van den Berghe, Greet
Mesotten, Dieter
Software-guided versus nurse-directed blood glucose control in critically ill patients: the LOGIC-2 multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial
title Software-guided versus nurse-directed blood glucose control in critically ill patients: the LOGIC-2 multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full Software-guided versus nurse-directed blood glucose control in critically ill patients: the LOGIC-2 multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial
title_fullStr Software-guided versus nurse-directed blood glucose control in critically ill patients: the LOGIC-2 multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Software-guided versus nurse-directed blood glucose control in critically ill patients: the LOGIC-2 multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial
title_short Software-guided versus nurse-directed blood glucose control in critically ill patients: the LOGIC-2 multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial
title_sort software-guided versus nurse-directed blood glucose control in critically ill patients: the logic-2 multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5557320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28806982
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1799-6
work_keys_str_mv AT duboisjasperina softwareguidedversusnursedirectedbloodglucosecontrolincriticallyillpatientsthelogic2multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT vanherpetom softwareguidedversusnursedirectedbloodglucosecontrolincriticallyillpatientsthelogic2multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT vanhooijdonkroosmarijnt softwareguidedversusnursedirectedbloodglucosecontrolincriticallyillpatientsthelogic2multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT woutersruben softwareguidedversusnursedirectedbloodglucosecontrolincriticallyillpatientsthelogic2multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT coartdomien softwareguidedversusnursedirectedbloodglucosecontrolincriticallyillpatientsthelogic2multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT wouterspieter softwareguidedversusnursedirectedbloodglucosecontrolincriticallyillpatientsthelogic2multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT vanasscheaime softwareguidedversusnursedirectedbloodglucosecontrolincriticallyillpatientsthelogic2multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT veraghtertguy softwareguidedversusnursedirectedbloodglucosecontrolincriticallyillpatientsthelogic2multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT demoorbart softwareguidedversusnursedirectedbloodglucosecontrolincriticallyillpatientsthelogic2multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT wautersjoost softwareguidedversusnursedirectedbloodglucosecontrolincriticallyillpatientsthelogic2multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT wilmeralexander softwareguidedversusnursedirectedbloodglucosecontrolincriticallyillpatientsthelogic2multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT schultzmarcusj softwareguidedversusnursedirectedbloodglucosecontrolincriticallyillpatientsthelogic2multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT vandenberghegreet softwareguidedversusnursedirectedbloodglucosecontrolincriticallyillpatientsthelogic2multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT mesottendieter softwareguidedversusnursedirectedbloodglucosecontrolincriticallyillpatientsthelogic2multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial