Cargando…
The typically developing paediatric foot: how flat should it be? A systematic review
BACKGROUND: All typically developing children are born with flexible flat feet, progressively developing a medial longitudinal arch during the first decade of their lives. Whilst the child’s foot is expected to be flat, there is currently no consensus as to how flat this foot should be. Furthermore,...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5558233/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28814975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-017-0218-1 |
_version_ | 1783257354598350848 |
---|---|
author | Uden, Hayley Scharfbillig, Rolf Causby, Ryan |
author_facet | Uden, Hayley Scharfbillig, Rolf Causby, Ryan |
author_sort | Uden, Hayley |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: All typically developing children are born with flexible flat feet, progressively developing a medial longitudinal arch during the first decade of their lives. Whilst the child’s foot is expected to be flat, there is currently no consensus as to how flat this foot should be. Furthermore, whilst feet are observed to decrease in flatness with increasing age, it is not known how flat they should be at each age increment. The objective of this systematic review is to define the postural characteristics of the ‘typically’ developing paediatric foot. METHODS: The PRISMA protocol was applied to compare all data currently published describing the typical development of the paediatric foot. The Epidemiological Appraisal Instrument (EAI) was used to assess the risk of bias of the included studies. RESULTS: Thirty four epidemiological papers pertaining to the development of the paediatric foot were graphically compared. Sixteen different foot posture assessments were identified of which footprint based measures were the most reported outcome. CONCLUSION: Firstly, the use of the term normal in relation to foot posture is misleading in the categorisation of the paediatric foot, as indeed a flat foot posture is a normal finding at specific ages. Secondly, the foot posture of the developing child is indeed age dependent and has been shown to change over time. Thirdly, no firm conclusion could be reached as to which age the foot posture of children ceases to develop further, as no two foot measures are comparable, therefore future research needs to consider the development of consensus recommendations as to the measurement of the paediatric foot, using valid and reliable assessment tools. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13047-017-0218-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5558233 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55582332017-08-16 The typically developing paediatric foot: how flat should it be? A systematic review Uden, Hayley Scharfbillig, Rolf Causby, Ryan J Foot Ankle Res Review BACKGROUND: All typically developing children are born with flexible flat feet, progressively developing a medial longitudinal arch during the first decade of their lives. Whilst the child’s foot is expected to be flat, there is currently no consensus as to how flat this foot should be. Furthermore, whilst feet are observed to decrease in flatness with increasing age, it is not known how flat they should be at each age increment. The objective of this systematic review is to define the postural characteristics of the ‘typically’ developing paediatric foot. METHODS: The PRISMA protocol was applied to compare all data currently published describing the typical development of the paediatric foot. The Epidemiological Appraisal Instrument (EAI) was used to assess the risk of bias of the included studies. RESULTS: Thirty four epidemiological papers pertaining to the development of the paediatric foot were graphically compared. Sixteen different foot posture assessments were identified of which footprint based measures were the most reported outcome. CONCLUSION: Firstly, the use of the term normal in relation to foot posture is misleading in the categorisation of the paediatric foot, as indeed a flat foot posture is a normal finding at specific ages. Secondly, the foot posture of the developing child is indeed age dependent and has been shown to change over time. Thirdly, no firm conclusion could be reached as to which age the foot posture of children ceases to develop further, as no two foot measures are comparable, therefore future research needs to consider the development of consensus recommendations as to the measurement of the paediatric foot, using valid and reliable assessment tools. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13047-017-0218-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5558233/ /pubmed/28814975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-017-0218-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Uden, Hayley Scharfbillig, Rolf Causby, Ryan The typically developing paediatric foot: how flat should it be? A systematic review |
title | The typically developing paediatric foot: how flat should it be? A systematic review |
title_full | The typically developing paediatric foot: how flat should it be? A systematic review |
title_fullStr | The typically developing paediatric foot: how flat should it be? A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | The typically developing paediatric foot: how flat should it be? A systematic review |
title_short | The typically developing paediatric foot: how flat should it be? A systematic review |
title_sort | typically developing paediatric foot: how flat should it be? a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5558233/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28814975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-017-0218-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT udenhayley thetypicallydevelopingpaediatricfoothowflatshoulditbeasystematicreview AT scharfbilligrolf thetypicallydevelopingpaediatricfoothowflatshoulditbeasystematicreview AT causbyryan thetypicallydevelopingpaediatricfoothowflatshoulditbeasystematicreview AT udenhayley typicallydevelopingpaediatricfoothowflatshoulditbeasystematicreview AT scharfbilligrolf typicallydevelopingpaediatricfoothowflatshoulditbeasystematicreview AT causbyryan typicallydevelopingpaediatricfoothowflatshoulditbeasystematicreview |