Cargando…
Sex and Electrode Configuration in Transcranial Electrical Stimulation
Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) can be an effective non-invasive neuromodulation procedure. Unfortunately, the considerable variation in reported treatment outcomes, both within and between studies, has made the procedure unreliable for many applications. To determine if individual differe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5558260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28855877 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00147 |
_version_ | 1783257358714011648 |
---|---|
author | Russell, Michael J. Goodman, Theodore A. Visse, Joseph M. Beckett, Laurel Saito, Naomi Lyeth, Bruce G. Recanzone, Gregg H. |
author_facet | Russell, Michael J. Goodman, Theodore A. Visse, Joseph M. Beckett, Laurel Saito, Naomi Lyeth, Bruce G. Recanzone, Gregg H. |
author_sort | Russell, Michael J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) can be an effective non-invasive neuromodulation procedure. Unfortunately, the considerable variation in reported treatment outcomes, both within and between studies, has made the procedure unreliable for many applications. To determine if individual differences in cranium morphology and tissue conductivity can account for some of this variation, the electrical density at two cortical locations (temporal and frontal) directly under scalp electrodes was modeled using a validated MRI modeling procedure in 23 subjects (12 males and 11 females). Three different electrode configurations (non-cephalic, bi-cranial, and ring) commonly used in tES were modeled at three current intensities (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mA). The aims were to assess the effects of configuration and current intensity on relative current received at a cortical brain target directly under the stimulating electrode and to characterize individual variation. The different electrode configurations resulted in up to a ninefold difference in mean current densities delivered to the brains. The ring configuration delivered the least current and the non-cephalic the most. Female subjects showed much less current to the brain than male subjects. Individual differences in the current received and differences in electrode configurations may account for significant variability in current delivered and, thus, potentially a significant portion of reported variation in clinical outcomes at two commonly targeted regions of the brain. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5558260 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55582602017-08-30 Sex and Electrode Configuration in Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Russell, Michael J. Goodman, Theodore A. Visse, Joseph M. Beckett, Laurel Saito, Naomi Lyeth, Bruce G. Recanzone, Gregg H. Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) can be an effective non-invasive neuromodulation procedure. Unfortunately, the considerable variation in reported treatment outcomes, both within and between studies, has made the procedure unreliable for many applications. To determine if individual differences in cranium morphology and tissue conductivity can account for some of this variation, the electrical density at two cortical locations (temporal and frontal) directly under scalp electrodes was modeled using a validated MRI modeling procedure in 23 subjects (12 males and 11 females). Three different electrode configurations (non-cephalic, bi-cranial, and ring) commonly used in tES were modeled at three current intensities (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mA). The aims were to assess the effects of configuration and current intensity on relative current received at a cortical brain target directly under the stimulating electrode and to characterize individual variation. The different electrode configurations resulted in up to a ninefold difference in mean current densities delivered to the brains. The ring configuration delivered the least current and the non-cephalic the most. Female subjects showed much less current to the brain than male subjects. Individual differences in the current received and differences in electrode configurations may account for significant variability in current delivered and, thus, potentially a significant portion of reported variation in clinical outcomes at two commonly targeted regions of the brain. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5558260/ /pubmed/28855877 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00147 Text en Copyright © 2017 Russell, Goodman, Visse, Beckett, Saito, Lyeth and Recanzone. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychiatry Russell, Michael J. Goodman, Theodore A. Visse, Joseph M. Beckett, Laurel Saito, Naomi Lyeth, Bruce G. Recanzone, Gregg H. Sex and Electrode Configuration in Transcranial Electrical Stimulation |
title | Sex and Electrode Configuration in Transcranial Electrical Stimulation |
title_full | Sex and Electrode Configuration in Transcranial Electrical Stimulation |
title_fullStr | Sex and Electrode Configuration in Transcranial Electrical Stimulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Sex and Electrode Configuration in Transcranial Electrical Stimulation |
title_short | Sex and Electrode Configuration in Transcranial Electrical Stimulation |
title_sort | sex and electrode configuration in transcranial electrical stimulation |
topic | Psychiatry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5558260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28855877 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00147 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT russellmichaelj sexandelectrodeconfigurationintranscranialelectricalstimulation AT goodmantheodorea sexandelectrodeconfigurationintranscranialelectricalstimulation AT vissejosephm sexandelectrodeconfigurationintranscranialelectricalstimulation AT beckettlaurel sexandelectrodeconfigurationintranscranialelectricalstimulation AT saitonaomi sexandelectrodeconfigurationintranscranialelectricalstimulation AT lyethbruceg sexandelectrodeconfigurationintranscranialelectricalstimulation AT recanzonegreggh sexandelectrodeconfigurationintranscranialelectricalstimulation |