Cargando…

Sex and Electrode Configuration in Transcranial Electrical Stimulation

Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) can be an effective non-invasive neuromodulation procedure. Unfortunately, the considerable variation in reported treatment outcomes, both within and between studies, has made the procedure unreliable for many applications. To determine if individual differe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Russell, Michael J., Goodman, Theodore A., Visse, Joseph M., Beckett, Laurel, Saito, Naomi, Lyeth, Bruce G., Recanzone, Gregg H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5558260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28855877
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00147
_version_ 1783257358714011648
author Russell, Michael J.
Goodman, Theodore A.
Visse, Joseph M.
Beckett, Laurel
Saito, Naomi
Lyeth, Bruce G.
Recanzone, Gregg H.
author_facet Russell, Michael J.
Goodman, Theodore A.
Visse, Joseph M.
Beckett, Laurel
Saito, Naomi
Lyeth, Bruce G.
Recanzone, Gregg H.
author_sort Russell, Michael J.
collection PubMed
description Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) can be an effective non-invasive neuromodulation procedure. Unfortunately, the considerable variation in reported treatment outcomes, both within and between studies, has made the procedure unreliable for many applications. To determine if individual differences in cranium morphology and tissue conductivity can account for some of this variation, the electrical density at two cortical locations (temporal and frontal) directly under scalp electrodes was modeled using a validated MRI modeling procedure in 23 subjects (12 males and 11 females). Three different electrode configurations (non-cephalic, bi-cranial, and ring) commonly used in tES were modeled at three current intensities (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mA). The aims were to assess the effects of configuration and current intensity on relative current received at a cortical brain target directly under the stimulating electrode and to characterize individual variation. The different electrode configurations resulted in up to a ninefold difference in mean current densities delivered to the brains. The ring configuration delivered the least current and the non-cephalic the most. Female subjects showed much less current to the brain than male subjects. Individual differences in the current received and differences in electrode configurations may account for significant variability in current delivered and, thus, potentially a significant portion of reported variation in clinical outcomes at two commonly targeted regions of the brain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5558260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55582602017-08-30 Sex and Electrode Configuration in Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Russell, Michael J. Goodman, Theodore A. Visse, Joseph M. Beckett, Laurel Saito, Naomi Lyeth, Bruce G. Recanzone, Gregg H. Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) can be an effective non-invasive neuromodulation procedure. Unfortunately, the considerable variation in reported treatment outcomes, both within and between studies, has made the procedure unreliable for many applications. To determine if individual differences in cranium morphology and tissue conductivity can account for some of this variation, the electrical density at two cortical locations (temporal and frontal) directly under scalp electrodes was modeled using a validated MRI modeling procedure in 23 subjects (12 males and 11 females). Three different electrode configurations (non-cephalic, bi-cranial, and ring) commonly used in tES were modeled at three current intensities (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mA). The aims were to assess the effects of configuration and current intensity on relative current received at a cortical brain target directly under the stimulating electrode and to characterize individual variation. The different electrode configurations resulted in up to a ninefold difference in mean current densities delivered to the brains. The ring configuration delivered the least current and the non-cephalic the most. Female subjects showed much less current to the brain than male subjects. Individual differences in the current received and differences in electrode configurations may account for significant variability in current delivered and, thus, potentially a significant portion of reported variation in clinical outcomes at two commonly targeted regions of the brain. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5558260/ /pubmed/28855877 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00147 Text en Copyright © 2017 Russell, Goodman, Visse, Beckett, Saito, Lyeth and Recanzone. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Russell, Michael J.
Goodman, Theodore A.
Visse, Joseph M.
Beckett, Laurel
Saito, Naomi
Lyeth, Bruce G.
Recanzone, Gregg H.
Sex and Electrode Configuration in Transcranial Electrical Stimulation
title Sex and Electrode Configuration in Transcranial Electrical Stimulation
title_full Sex and Electrode Configuration in Transcranial Electrical Stimulation
title_fullStr Sex and Electrode Configuration in Transcranial Electrical Stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Sex and Electrode Configuration in Transcranial Electrical Stimulation
title_short Sex and Electrode Configuration in Transcranial Electrical Stimulation
title_sort sex and electrode configuration in transcranial electrical stimulation
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5558260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28855877
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00147
work_keys_str_mv AT russellmichaelj sexandelectrodeconfigurationintranscranialelectricalstimulation
AT goodmantheodorea sexandelectrodeconfigurationintranscranialelectricalstimulation
AT vissejosephm sexandelectrodeconfigurationintranscranialelectricalstimulation
AT beckettlaurel sexandelectrodeconfigurationintranscranialelectricalstimulation
AT saitonaomi sexandelectrodeconfigurationintranscranialelectricalstimulation
AT lyethbruceg sexandelectrodeconfigurationintranscranialelectricalstimulation
AT recanzonegreggh sexandelectrodeconfigurationintranscranialelectricalstimulation