Cargando…

Intra-cesarean insertion and fixation of frameless intrauterine devices

Various contraceptive methods are available to postpartum women including hormonal and nonhormonal barriers, as well as injectable forms. Of all the available birth control methods, intrauterine devices (IUD) are felt by many to be the near-ideal form of contraception, and are recommended by advocac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karateke, Ateş, Turgut, Abdulkadir, Özdamar, Özkan, Wildemeersch, Dirk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5558320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28913137
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.90532
_version_ 1783257367764271104
author Karateke, Ateş
Turgut, Abdulkadir
Özdamar, Özkan
Wildemeersch, Dirk
author_facet Karateke, Ateş
Turgut, Abdulkadir
Özdamar, Özkan
Wildemeersch, Dirk
author_sort Karateke, Ateş
collection PubMed
description Various contraceptive methods are available to postpartum women including hormonal and nonhormonal barriers, as well as injectable forms. Of all the available birth control methods, intrauterine devices (IUD) are felt by many to be the near-ideal form of contraception, and are recommended by advocacy groups, physicians, and gynecological organizations worldwide. Immediate postpartum IUD insertion deserves greater attention because it can provide immediate contraception, prevents repeat unintended pregnancies, and may serve to reduce the incidence or need for secondary cesarean delivery; however, insertion of conventional T-shape IUDs immediately post placenta delivery is limited by their high expulsion and displacement rates. Anchoring of frameless-design IUDs that lack conventional cross-arms to the uterine fundal surfaces has been medically and commercially available throughout Europe for many years. The placement technique is simple, has minimal patient discomfort, and high long-term patient acceptance due to its high degree of uterine compatibility as a consequence of its small size and segmented design. Frameless-design IUD implantation appears to represent a major advance, suitable for general use, due to its lack of timing restraints and its simplicity of attachment, which only requires limited training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5558320
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Galenos Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55583202017-09-14 Intra-cesarean insertion and fixation of frameless intrauterine devices Karateke, Ateş Turgut, Abdulkadir Özdamar, Özkan Wildemeersch, Dirk Turk J Obstet Gynecol Review Various contraceptive methods are available to postpartum women including hormonal and nonhormonal barriers, as well as injectable forms. Of all the available birth control methods, intrauterine devices (IUD) are felt by many to be the near-ideal form of contraception, and are recommended by advocacy groups, physicians, and gynecological organizations worldwide. Immediate postpartum IUD insertion deserves greater attention because it can provide immediate contraception, prevents repeat unintended pregnancies, and may serve to reduce the incidence or need for secondary cesarean delivery; however, insertion of conventional T-shape IUDs immediately post placenta delivery is limited by their high expulsion and displacement rates. Anchoring of frameless-design IUDs that lack conventional cross-arms to the uterine fundal surfaces has been medically and commercially available throughout Europe for many years. The placement technique is simple, has minimal patient discomfort, and high long-term patient acceptance due to its high degree of uterine compatibility as a consequence of its small size and segmented design. Frameless-design IUD implantation appears to represent a major advance, suitable for general use, due to its lack of timing restraints and its simplicity of attachment, which only requires limited training. Galenos Publishing 2017-03 2017-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5558320/ /pubmed/28913137 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.90532 Text en © Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology published by Galenos Publishing House. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Karateke, Ateş
Turgut, Abdulkadir
Özdamar, Özkan
Wildemeersch, Dirk
Intra-cesarean insertion and fixation of frameless intrauterine devices
title Intra-cesarean insertion and fixation of frameless intrauterine devices
title_full Intra-cesarean insertion and fixation of frameless intrauterine devices
title_fullStr Intra-cesarean insertion and fixation of frameless intrauterine devices
title_full_unstemmed Intra-cesarean insertion and fixation of frameless intrauterine devices
title_short Intra-cesarean insertion and fixation of frameless intrauterine devices
title_sort intra-cesarean insertion and fixation of frameless intrauterine devices
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5558320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28913137
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.90532
work_keys_str_mv AT karatekeates intracesareaninsertionandfixationofframelessintrauterinedevices
AT turgutabdulkadir intracesareaninsertionandfixationofframelessintrauterinedevices
AT ozdamarozkan intracesareaninsertionandfixationofframelessintrauterinedevices
AT wildemeerschdirk intracesareaninsertionandfixationofframelessintrauterinedevices