Cargando…

Does screening for vaginal infection have an impact on pregnancy rates in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles?

OBJECTIVE: Assisted reproduction techniques have become widespread worldwide. Considering their costs, physicians endeavor to improve pregnancy rates. Infections are one of the disrupting problems in this arena. We aimed to investigate the effects of screening for vaginal infection on pregnancy rate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eldivan, Özlem, Evliyaoğlu, Özlem, Ersoy, Ebru, Aksu, Gönül, Dilbaz, Serdar, Göktolga, Ümit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5558349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28913082
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.56563
_version_ 1783257374809653248
author Eldivan, Özlem
Evliyaoğlu, Özlem
Ersoy, Ebru
Aksu, Gönül
Dilbaz, Serdar
Göktolga, Ümit
author_facet Eldivan, Özlem
Evliyaoğlu, Özlem
Ersoy, Ebru
Aksu, Gönül
Dilbaz, Serdar
Göktolga, Ümit
author_sort Eldivan, Özlem
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Assisted reproduction techniques have become widespread worldwide. Considering their costs, physicians endeavor to improve pregnancy rates. Infections are one of the disrupting problems in this arena. We aimed to investigate the effects of screening for vaginal infection on pregnancy rates in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty patients randomized into two groups for this study. Patients were screened for vaginal infections in group 1, and no screening was performed in group 2. The assisted reproduction outcomes were investigated and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between ages, or durations and causes of infertility of patients who conceived and of those who did conceive. Forty-five patients in group 1, and 40 patients in group 2 reached the embryo transfer stage. The rates of conception were 23.5% (n=4) in culture-positive patients (n=17), and 42.9% (n=12) in culture-negative patients (n=28) in group 1. There was no significant difference among patients who were not screened, screen-positive, and screen-negative, in terms of pregnancy rates. None of the patients had Neisseria gonorrhoeae or Trichomonas vaginalis. Bacterial vaginosis was detected in 13 patients, and both bacterial vaginosis and Chlamydia trachomatis were detected in 4 patients. Three of 4 patients who conceived screen-positive and 8 of 12 patients who conceived screen-negative delivered healthily at term. CONCLUSION: No significant difference was found between patients who were sampled for culture and patients who were not sampled in terms of pregnancy rates. Also, no difference was found between the patients who were culture-negative and patients who were treated with antimicrobials after a culture positive result. Further larger studies are warranted to clarify this issue.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5558349
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Galenos Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55583492017-09-14 Does screening for vaginal infection have an impact on pregnancy rates in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles? Eldivan, Özlem Evliyaoğlu, Özlem Ersoy, Ebru Aksu, Gönül Dilbaz, Serdar Göktolga, Ümit Turk J Obstet Gynecol Clinical Investigation OBJECTIVE: Assisted reproduction techniques have become widespread worldwide. Considering their costs, physicians endeavor to improve pregnancy rates. Infections are one of the disrupting problems in this arena. We aimed to investigate the effects of screening for vaginal infection on pregnancy rates in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty patients randomized into two groups for this study. Patients were screened for vaginal infections in group 1, and no screening was performed in group 2. The assisted reproduction outcomes were investigated and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between ages, or durations and causes of infertility of patients who conceived and of those who did conceive. Forty-five patients in group 1, and 40 patients in group 2 reached the embryo transfer stage. The rates of conception were 23.5% (n=4) in culture-positive patients (n=17), and 42.9% (n=12) in culture-negative patients (n=28) in group 1. There was no significant difference among patients who were not screened, screen-positive, and screen-negative, in terms of pregnancy rates. None of the patients had Neisseria gonorrhoeae or Trichomonas vaginalis. Bacterial vaginosis was detected in 13 patients, and both bacterial vaginosis and Chlamydia trachomatis were detected in 4 patients. Three of 4 patients who conceived screen-positive and 8 of 12 patients who conceived screen-negative delivered healthily at term. CONCLUSION: No significant difference was found between patients who were sampled for culture and patients who were not sampled in terms of pregnancy rates. Also, no difference was found between the patients who were culture-negative and patients who were treated with antimicrobials after a culture positive result. Further larger studies are warranted to clarify this issue. Galenos Publishing 2016-03 2016-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5558349/ /pubmed/28913082 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.56563 Text en © Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology published by Galenos Publishing House. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
Eldivan, Özlem
Evliyaoğlu, Özlem
Ersoy, Ebru
Aksu, Gönül
Dilbaz, Serdar
Göktolga, Ümit
Does screening for vaginal infection have an impact on pregnancy rates in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles?
title Does screening for vaginal infection have an impact on pregnancy rates in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles?
title_full Does screening for vaginal infection have an impact on pregnancy rates in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles?
title_fullStr Does screening for vaginal infection have an impact on pregnancy rates in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles?
title_full_unstemmed Does screening for vaginal infection have an impact on pregnancy rates in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles?
title_short Does screening for vaginal infection have an impact on pregnancy rates in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles?
title_sort does screening for vaginal infection have an impact on pregnancy rates in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles?
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5558349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28913082
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.56563
work_keys_str_mv AT eldivanozlem doesscreeningforvaginalinfectionhaveanimpactonpregnancyratesinintracytoplasmicsperminjectioncycles
AT evliyaogluozlem doesscreeningforvaginalinfectionhaveanimpactonpregnancyratesinintracytoplasmicsperminjectioncycles
AT ersoyebru doesscreeningforvaginalinfectionhaveanimpactonpregnancyratesinintracytoplasmicsperminjectioncycles
AT aksugonul doesscreeningforvaginalinfectionhaveanimpactonpregnancyratesinintracytoplasmicsperminjectioncycles
AT dilbazserdar doesscreeningforvaginalinfectionhaveanimpactonpregnancyratesinintracytoplasmicsperminjectioncycles
AT goktolgaumit doesscreeningforvaginalinfectionhaveanimpactonpregnancyratesinintracytoplasmicsperminjectioncycles