Cargando…

Summary of 2185 prenatal invasive procedures in a single center: A retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency, indications, and outcomes of diagnostic invasive prenatal procedures (DIPP) performed in a university hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective, observational study included 2185 cases of DIPP (chorionic villus sampling, amniocentesis, and cordocentes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Özcan, Hüseyin Çağlayan, Uğur, Mete Gürol, Sucu, Seyhun, Mustafa, Aynur, Bayramoğlu Tepe, Neslihan, Balat, Özcan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5558411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28913147
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.36097
_version_ 1783257389741375488
author Özcan, Hüseyin Çağlayan
Uğur, Mete Gürol
Sucu, Seyhun
Mustafa, Aynur
Bayramoğlu Tepe, Neslihan
Balat, Özcan
author_facet Özcan, Hüseyin Çağlayan
Uğur, Mete Gürol
Sucu, Seyhun
Mustafa, Aynur
Bayramoğlu Tepe, Neslihan
Balat, Özcan
author_sort Özcan, Hüseyin Çağlayan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency, indications, and outcomes of diagnostic invasive prenatal procedures (DIPP) performed in a university hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective, observational study included 2185 cases of DIPP (chorionic villus sampling, amniocentesis, and cordocentesis) performed at the department of obstetrics and gynecology of a university hospital between 2010 and 2016. We included all DIPP cases performed between 11 and 24 weeks of gestation. We compared the different types of DIPP performed in our hospital. RESULTS: Two thousand one hundred eighty-five procedures were performed (1853 amniocenteses, 326 chorionic villus sampling, and 6 cordocenteses). The main indication for performing invasive procedures was abnormal results of aneuploidy screening for trisomy 21, followed by maternal age, and fetal structural abnormality. The fetal karyotype was altered in 154 (26.1%) cases. Trisomy 21 was the most common aneuploidy followed by trisomy 18, monosomy X, and trisomy 13. Fetal karyotype could not be revealed in 42 (2%) cases due to maternal contamination in 18 cases, inadequate sampling in 4 cases, and failure of cell culture in 27 cases. There were 2 pregnancy losses due to the invasive procedure (only in amniocentesis). CONCLUSION: The ideal approach to pregnancies with a detected chromosomal abnormality should be tailored according to the individual choice of the couples regarding whether they decide for or against a child with a known chromosomal abnormality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5558411
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Galenos Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55584112017-09-14 Summary of 2185 prenatal invasive procedures in a single center: A retrospective analysis Özcan, Hüseyin Çağlayan Uğur, Mete Gürol Sucu, Seyhun Mustafa, Aynur Bayramoğlu Tepe, Neslihan Balat, Özcan Turk J Obstet Gynecol Clinical Investigation OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency, indications, and outcomes of diagnostic invasive prenatal procedures (DIPP) performed in a university hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective, observational study included 2185 cases of DIPP (chorionic villus sampling, amniocentesis, and cordocentesis) performed at the department of obstetrics and gynecology of a university hospital between 2010 and 2016. We included all DIPP cases performed between 11 and 24 weeks of gestation. We compared the different types of DIPP performed in our hospital. RESULTS: Two thousand one hundred eighty-five procedures were performed (1853 amniocenteses, 326 chorionic villus sampling, and 6 cordocenteses). The main indication for performing invasive procedures was abnormal results of aneuploidy screening for trisomy 21, followed by maternal age, and fetal structural abnormality. The fetal karyotype was altered in 154 (26.1%) cases. Trisomy 21 was the most common aneuploidy followed by trisomy 18, monosomy X, and trisomy 13. Fetal karyotype could not be revealed in 42 (2%) cases due to maternal contamination in 18 cases, inadequate sampling in 4 cases, and failure of cell culture in 27 cases. There were 2 pregnancy losses due to the invasive procedure (only in amniocentesis). CONCLUSION: The ideal approach to pregnancies with a detected chromosomal abnormality should be tailored according to the individual choice of the couples regarding whether they decide for or against a child with a known chromosomal abnormality. Galenos Publishing 2017-06 2017-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5558411/ /pubmed/28913147 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.36097 Text en ©Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology published by Galenos Publishing. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
Özcan, Hüseyin Çağlayan
Uğur, Mete Gürol
Sucu, Seyhun
Mustafa, Aynur
Bayramoğlu Tepe, Neslihan
Balat, Özcan
Summary of 2185 prenatal invasive procedures in a single center: A retrospective analysis
title Summary of 2185 prenatal invasive procedures in a single center: A retrospective analysis
title_full Summary of 2185 prenatal invasive procedures in a single center: A retrospective analysis
title_fullStr Summary of 2185 prenatal invasive procedures in a single center: A retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Summary of 2185 prenatal invasive procedures in a single center: A retrospective analysis
title_short Summary of 2185 prenatal invasive procedures in a single center: A retrospective analysis
title_sort summary of 2185 prenatal invasive procedures in a single center: a retrospective analysis
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5558411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28913147
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjod.36097
work_keys_str_mv AT ozcanhuseyincaglayan summaryof2185prenatalinvasiveproceduresinasinglecenteraretrospectiveanalysis
AT ugurmetegurol summaryof2185prenatalinvasiveproceduresinasinglecenteraretrospectiveanalysis
AT sucuseyhun summaryof2185prenatalinvasiveproceduresinasinglecenteraretrospectiveanalysis
AT mustafaaynur summaryof2185prenatalinvasiveproceduresinasinglecenteraretrospectiveanalysis
AT bayramoglutepeneslihan summaryof2185prenatalinvasiveproceduresinasinglecenteraretrospectiveanalysis
AT balatozcan summaryof2185prenatalinvasiveproceduresinasinglecenteraretrospectiveanalysis