Cargando…
Key factors influencing allied health research capacity in a large Australian metropolitan health district
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify key factors affecting research capacity and engagement of allied health professionals working in a large metropolitan health service. Identifying such factors will assist in determining strategies for building research capacity in allied health. MATER...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5558427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28860795 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S142009 |
_version_ | 1783257392871374848 |
---|---|
author | Alison, Jennifer A Zafiropoulos, Bill Heard, Robert |
author_facet | Alison, Jennifer A Zafiropoulos, Bill Heard, Robert |
author_sort | Alison, Jennifer A |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify key factors affecting research capacity and engagement of allied health professionals working in a large metropolitan health service. Identifying such factors will assist in determining strategies for building research capacity in allied health. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 276 allied health professionals working within the Sydney Local Health District (SLHD) completed the Research Capacity in Context Tool (RCCT) that measures research capacity and culture across three domains: organization, team, and individual. An exploratory factor analysis was undertaken to identify common themes within each of these domains. Correlations were performed between demographic variables and the identified factors to determine possible relationships. RESULTS: Research capacity and culture success/skill levels were reported to be higher within the organization and team domains compared to the individual domain (median [interquartile range, IQR] 6 [5–8], 6 [5–8], 5 [3–7], respectively; Friedman χ(2)(2)=42.04, p<0.001). Exploratory factor analyses were performed to identify factors that were perceived by allied health respondents to affect research capacity. Factors identified within the organization domain were infrastructure for research (eg, funds and equipment) and research culture (eg, senior manager’s support for research); within the team domain the factors were research orientation (eg, dissemination of results at research seminars) and research support (eg, providing staff research training). Within the individual domain, only one factor was identified which was the research skill of the individual (eg, literature evaluation, submitting ethics applications and data analysis, and writing for publication). CONCLUSION: The reported skill/success levels in research were lower for the individual domain compared to the organization or team domains. Key factors were identified in each domain that impacted on allied health research capacity. As these factors were different in each domain, various strategies may be required at the level of the organization, team, and individual to support and build allied health research capacity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5558427 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55584272017-08-31 Key factors influencing allied health research capacity in a large Australian metropolitan health district Alison, Jennifer A Zafiropoulos, Bill Heard, Robert J Multidiscip Healthc Original Research OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify key factors affecting research capacity and engagement of allied health professionals working in a large metropolitan health service. Identifying such factors will assist in determining strategies for building research capacity in allied health. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 276 allied health professionals working within the Sydney Local Health District (SLHD) completed the Research Capacity in Context Tool (RCCT) that measures research capacity and culture across three domains: organization, team, and individual. An exploratory factor analysis was undertaken to identify common themes within each of these domains. Correlations were performed between demographic variables and the identified factors to determine possible relationships. RESULTS: Research capacity and culture success/skill levels were reported to be higher within the organization and team domains compared to the individual domain (median [interquartile range, IQR] 6 [5–8], 6 [5–8], 5 [3–7], respectively; Friedman χ(2)(2)=42.04, p<0.001). Exploratory factor analyses were performed to identify factors that were perceived by allied health respondents to affect research capacity. Factors identified within the organization domain were infrastructure for research (eg, funds and equipment) and research culture (eg, senior manager’s support for research); within the team domain the factors were research orientation (eg, dissemination of results at research seminars) and research support (eg, providing staff research training). Within the individual domain, only one factor was identified which was the research skill of the individual (eg, literature evaluation, submitting ethics applications and data analysis, and writing for publication). CONCLUSION: The reported skill/success levels in research were lower for the individual domain compared to the organization or team domains. Key factors were identified in each domain that impacted on allied health research capacity. As these factors were different in each domain, various strategies may be required at the level of the organization, team, and individual to support and build allied health research capacity. Dove Medical Press 2017-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5558427/ /pubmed/28860795 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S142009 Text en © 2017 Alison et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Alison, Jennifer A Zafiropoulos, Bill Heard, Robert Key factors influencing allied health research capacity in a large Australian metropolitan health district |
title | Key factors influencing allied health research capacity in a large Australian metropolitan health district |
title_full | Key factors influencing allied health research capacity in a large Australian metropolitan health district |
title_fullStr | Key factors influencing allied health research capacity in a large Australian metropolitan health district |
title_full_unstemmed | Key factors influencing allied health research capacity in a large Australian metropolitan health district |
title_short | Key factors influencing allied health research capacity in a large Australian metropolitan health district |
title_sort | key factors influencing allied health research capacity in a large australian metropolitan health district |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5558427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28860795 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S142009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alisonjennifera keyfactorsinfluencingalliedhealthresearchcapacityinalargeaustralianmetropolitanhealthdistrict AT zafiropoulosbill keyfactorsinfluencingalliedhealthresearchcapacityinalargeaustralianmetropolitanhealthdistrict AT heardrobert keyfactorsinfluencingalliedhealthresearchcapacityinalargeaustralianmetropolitanhealthdistrict |