Cargando…

Key factors influencing allied health research capacity in a large Australian metropolitan health district

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify key factors affecting research capacity and engagement of allied health professionals working in a large metropolitan health service. Identifying such factors will assist in determining strategies for building research capacity in allied health. MATER...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alison, Jennifer A, Zafiropoulos, Bill, Heard, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5558427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28860795
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S142009
_version_ 1783257392871374848
author Alison, Jennifer A
Zafiropoulos, Bill
Heard, Robert
author_facet Alison, Jennifer A
Zafiropoulos, Bill
Heard, Robert
author_sort Alison, Jennifer A
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify key factors affecting research capacity and engagement of allied health professionals working in a large metropolitan health service. Identifying such factors will assist in determining strategies for building research capacity in allied health. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 276 allied health professionals working within the Sydney Local Health District (SLHD) completed the Research Capacity in Context Tool (RCCT) that measures research capacity and culture across three domains: organization, team, and individual. An exploratory factor analysis was undertaken to identify common themes within each of these domains. Correlations were performed between demographic variables and the identified factors to determine possible relationships. RESULTS: Research capacity and culture success/skill levels were reported to be higher within the organization and team domains compared to the individual domain (median [interquartile range, IQR] 6 [5–8], 6 [5–8], 5 [3–7], respectively; Friedman χ(2)(2)=42.04, p<0.001). Exploratory factor analyses were performed to identify factors that were perceived by allied health respondents to affect research capacity. Factors identified within the organization domain were infrastructure for research (eg, funds and equipment) and research culture (eg, senior manager’s support for research); within the team domain the factors were research orientation (eg, dissemination of results at research seminars) and research support (eg, providing staff research training). Within the individual domain, only one factor was identified which was the research skill of the individual (eg, literature evaluation, submitting ethics applications and data analysis, and writing for publication). CONCLUSION: The reported skill/success levels in research were lower for the individual domain compared to the organization or team domains. Key factors were identified in each domain that impacted on allied health research capacity. As these factors were different in each domain, various strategies may be required at the level of the organization, team, and individual to support and build allied health research capacity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5558427
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55584272017-08-31 Key factors influencing allied health research capacity in a large Australian metropolitan health district Alison, Jennifer A Zafiropoulos, Bill Heard, Robert J Multidiscip Healthc Original Research OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify key factors affecting research capacity and engagement of allied health professionals working in a large metropolitan health service. Identifying such factors will assist in determining strategies for building research capacity in allied health. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 276 allied health professionals working within the Sydney Local Health District (SLHD) completed the Research Capacity in Context Tool (RCCT) that measures research capacity and culture across three domains: organization, team, and individual. An exploratory factor analysis was undertaken to identify common themes within each of these domains. Correlations were performed between demographic variables and the identified factors to determine possible relationships. RESULTS: Research capacity and culture success/skill levels were reported to be higher within the organization and team domains compared to the individual domain (median [interquartile range, IQR] 6 [5–8], 6 [5–8], 5 [3–7], respectively; Friedman χ(2)(2)=42.04, p<0.001). Exploratory factor analyses were performed to identify factors that were perceived by allied health respondents to affect research capacity. Factors identified within the organization domain were infrastructure for research (eg, funds and equipment) and research culture (eg, senior manager’s support for research); within the team domain the factors were research orientation (eg, dissemination of results at research seminars) and research support (eg, providing staff research training). Within the individual domain, only one factor was identified which was the research skill of the individual (eg, literature evaluation, submitting ethics applications and data analysis, and writing for publication). CONCLUSION: The reported skill/success levels in research were lower for the individual domain compared to the organization or team domains. Key factors were identified in each domain that impacted on allied health research capacity. As these factors were different in each domain, various strategies may be required at the level of the organization, team, and individual to support and build allied health research capacity. Dove Medical Press 2017-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5558427/ /pubmed/28860795 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S142009 Text en © 2017 Alison et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Alison, Jennifer A
Zafiropoulos, Bill
Heard, Robert
Key factors influencing allied health research capacity in a large Australian metropolitan health district
title Key factors influencing allied health research capacity in a large Australian metropolitan health district
title_full Key factors influencing allied health research capacity in a large Australian metropolitan health district
title_fullStr Key factors influencing allied health research capacity in a large Australian metropolitan health district
title_full_unstemmed Key factors influencing allied health research capacity in a large Australian metropolitan health district
title_short Key factors influencing allied health research capacity in a large Australian metropolitan health district
title_sort key factors influencing allied health research capacity in a large australian metropolitan health district
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5558427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28860795
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S142009
work_keys_str_mv AT alisonjennifera keyfactorsinfluencingalliedhealthresearchcapacityinalargeaustralianmetropolitanhealthdistrict
AT zafiropoulosbill keyfactorsinfluencingalliedhealthresearchcapacityinalargeaustralianmetropolitanhealthdistrict
AT heardrobert keyfactorsinfluencingalliedhealthresearchcapacityinalargeaustralianmetropolitanhealthdistrict