Cargando…

Schrödinger’s microbes: Tools for distinguishing the living from the dead in microbial ecosystems

While often obvious for macroscopic organisms, determining whether a microbe is dead or alive is fraught with complications. Fields such as microbial ecology, environmental health, and medical microbiology each determine how best to assess which members of the microbial community are alive, accordin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Emerson, Joanne B., Adams, Rachel I., Román, Clarisse M. Betancourt, Brooks, Brandon, Coil, David A., Dahlhausen, Katherine, Ganz, Holly H., Hartmann, Erica M., Hsu, Tiffany, Justice, Nicholas B., Paulino-Lima, Ivan G., Luongo, Julia C., Lymperopoulou, Despoina S., Gomez-Silvan, Cinta, Rothschild-Mancinelli, Brooke, Balk, Melike, Huttenhower, Curtis, Nocker, Andreas, Vaishampayan, Parag, Rothschild, Lynn J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5558654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28810907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-017-0285-3
_version_ 1783257419356307456
author Emerson, Joanne B.
Adams, Rachel I.
Román, Clarisse M. Betancourt
Brooks, Brandon
Coil, David A.
Dahlhausen, Katherine
Ganz, Holly H.
Hartmann, Erica M.
Hsu, Tiffany
Justice, Nicholas B.
Paulino-Lima, Ivan G.
Luongo, Julia C.
Lymperopoulou, Despoina S.
Gomez-Silvan, Cinta
Rothschild-Mancinelli, Brooke
Balk, Melike
Huttenhower, Curtis
Nocker, Andreas
Vaishampayan, Parag
Rothschild, Lynn J.
author_facet Emerson, Joanne B.
Adams, Rachel I.
Román, Clarisse M. Betancourt
Brooks, Brandon
Coil, David A.
Dahlhausen, Katherine
Ganz, Holly H.
Hartmann, Erica M.
Hsu, Tiffany
Justice, Nicholas B.
Paulino-Lima, Ivan G.
Luongo, Julia C.
Lymperopoulou, Despoina S.
Gomez-Silvan, Cinta
Rothschild-Mancinelli, Brooke
Balk, Melike
Huttenhower, Curtis
Nocker, Andreas
Vaishampayan, Parag
Rothschild, Lynn J.
author_sort Emerson, Joanne B.
collection PubMed
description While often obvious for macroscopic organisms, determining whether a microbe is dead or alive is fraught with complications. Fields such as microbial ecology, environmental health, and medical microbiology each determine how best to assess which members of the microbial community are alive, according to their respective scientific and/or regulatory needs. Many of these fields have gone from studying communities on a bulk level to the fine-scale resolution of microbial populations within consortia. For example, advances in nucleic acid sequencing technologies and downstream bioinformatic analyses have allowed for high-resolution insight into microbial community composition and metabolic potential, yet we know very little about whether such community DNA sequences represent viable microorganisms. In this review, we describe a number of techniques, from microscopy- to molecular-based, that have been used to test for viability (live/dead determination) and/or activity in various contexts, including newer techniques that are compatible with or complementary to downstream nucleic acid sequencing. We describe the compatibility of these viability assessments with high-throughput quantification techniques, including flow cytometry and quantitative PCR (qPCR). Although bacterial viability-linked community characterizations are now feasible in many environments and thus are the focus of this critical review, further methods development is needed for complex environmental samples and to more fully capture the diversity of microbes (e.g., eukaryotic microbes and viruses) and metabolic states (e.g., spores) of microbes in natural environments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5558654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55586542017-08-16 Schrödinger’s microbes: Tools for distinguishing the living from the dead in microbial ecosystems Emerson, Joanne B. Adams, Rachel I. Román, Clarisse M. Betancourt Brooks, Brandon Coil, David A. Dahlhausen, Katherine Ganz, Holly H. Hartmann, Erica M. Hsu, Tiffany Justice, Nicholas B. Paulino-Lima, Ivan G. Luongo, Julia C. Lymperopoulou, Despoina S. Gomez-Silvan, Cinta Rothschild-Mancinelli, Brooke Balk, Melike Huttenhower, Curtis Nocker, Andreas Vaishampayan, Parag Rothschild, Lynn J. Microbiome Review While often obvious for macroscopic organisms, determining whether a microbe is dead or alive is fraught with complications. Fields such as microbial ecology, environmental health, and medical microbiology each determine how best to assess which members of the microbial community are alive, according to their respective scientific and/or regulatory needs. Many of these fields have gone from studying communities on a bulk level to the fine-scale resolution of microbial populations within consortia. For example, advances in nucleic acid sequencing technologies and downstream bioinformatic analyses have allowed for high-resolution insight into microbial community composition and metabolic potential, yet we know very little about whether such community DNA sequences represent viable microorganisms. In this review, we describe a number of techniques, from microscopy- to molecular-based, that have been used to test for viability (live/dead determination) and/or activity in various contexts, including newer techniques that are compatible with or complementary to downstream nucleic acid sequencing. We describe the compatibility of these viability assessments with high-throughput quantification techniques, including flow cytometry and quantitative PCR (qPCR). Although bacterial viability-linked community characterizations are now feasible in many environments and thus are the focus of this critical review, further methods development is needed for complex environmental samples and to more fully capture the diversity of microbes (e.g., eukaryotic microbes and viruses) and metabolic states (e.g., spores) of microbes in natural environments. BioMed Central 2017-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5558654/ /pubmed/28810907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-017-0285-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Emerson, Joanne B.
Adams, Rachel I.
Román, Clarisse M. Betancourt
Brooks, Brandon
Coil, David A.
Dahlhausen, Katherine
Ganz, Holly H.
Hartmann, Erica M.
Hsu, Tiffany
Justice, Nicholas B.
Paulino-Lima, Ivan G.
Luongo, Julia C.
Lymperopoulou, Despoina S.
Gomez-Silvan, Cinta
Rothschild-Mancinelli, Brooke
Balk, Melike
Huttenhower, Curtis
Nocker, Andreas
Vaishampayan, Parag
Rothschild, Lynn J.
Schrödinger’s microbes: Tools for distinguishing the living from the dead in microbial ecosystems
title Schrödinger’s microbes: Tools for distinguishing the living from the dead in microbial ecosystems
title_full Schrödinger’s microbes: Tools for distinguishing the living from the dead in microbial ecosystems
title_fullStr Schrödinger’s microbes: Tools for distinguishing the living from the dead in microbial ecosystems
title_full_unstemmed Schrödinger’s microbes: Tools for distinguishing the living from the dead in microbial ecosystems
title_short Schrödinger’s microbes: Tools for distinguishing the living from the dead in microbial ecosystems
title_sort schrödinger’s microbes: tools for distinguishing the living from the dead in microbial ecosystems
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5558654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28810907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-017-0285-3
work_keys_str_mv AT emersonjoanneb schrodingersmicrobestoolsfordistinguishingthelivingfromthedeadinmicrobialecosystems
AT adamsracheli schrodingersmicrobestoolsfordistinguishingthelivingfromthedeadinmicrobialecosystems
AT romanclarissembetancourt schrodingersmicrobestoolsfordistinguishingthelivingfromthedeadinmicrobialecosystems
AT brooksbrandon schrodingersmicrobestoolsfordistinguishingthelivingfromthedeadinmicrobialecosystems
AT coildavida schrodingersmicrobestoolsfordistinguishingthelivingfromthedeadinmicrobialecosystems
AT dahlhausenkatherine schrodingersmicrobestoolsfordistinguishingthelivingfromthedeadinmicrobialecosystems
AT ganzhollyh schrodingersmicrobestoolsfordistinguishingthelivingfromthedeadinmicrobialecosystems
AT hartmannericam schrodingersmicrobestoolsfordistinguishingthelivingfromthedeadinmicrobialecosystems
AT hsutiffany schrodingersmicrobestoolsfordistinguishingthelivingfromthedeadinmicrobialecosystems
AT justicenicholasb schrodingersmicrobestoolsfordistinguishingthelivingfromthedeadinmicrobialecosystems
AT paulinolimaivang schrodingersmicrobestoolsfordistinguishingthelivingfromthedeadinmicrobialecosystems
AT luongojuliac schrodingersmicrobestoolsfordistinguishingthelivingfromthedeadinmicrobialecosystems
AT lymperopouloudespoinas schrodingersmicrobestoolsfordistinguishingthelivingfromthedeadinmicrobialecosystems
AT gomezsilvancinta schrodingersmicrobestoolsfordistinguishingthelivingfromthedeadinmicrobialecosystems
AT rothschildmancinellibrooke schrodingersmicrobestoolsfordistinguishingthelivingfromthedeadinmicrobialecosystems
AT balkmelike schrodingersmicrobestoolsfordistinguishingthelivingfromthedeadinmicrobialecosystems
AT huttenhowercurtis schrodingersmicrobestoolsfordistinguishingthelivingfromthedeadinmicrobialecosystems
AT nockerandreas schrodingersmicrobestoolsfordistinguishingthelivingfromthedeadinmicrobialecosystems
AT vaishampayanparag schrodingersmicrobestoolsfordistinguishingthelivingfromthedeadinmicrobialecosystems
AT rothschildlynnj schrodingersmicrobestoolsfordistinguishingthelivingfromthedeadinmicrobialecosystems