Cargando…

Kinase-driven metabolic signalling as a predictor of response to carboplatin–paclitaxel adjuvant treatment in advanced ovarian cancers

BACKGROUND: The biological mechanisms underlying early- and advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancers (EOCs) are still poorly understood. This study explored kinase-driven metabolic signalling in early and advanced EOCs, and its role in tumour progression and response to carboplatin–paclitaxel treat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sereni, Maria Isabella, Baldelli, Elisa, Gambara, Guido, Ravaggi, Antonella, Hodge, K Alex, Alberts, David S, Guillen-Rodriguez, Jose M, Dong, Ting, Memo, Maurizio, Odicino, Franco, Angioli, Roberto, Liotta, Lance A, Pecorelli, Sergio L, Petricoin, Emanuel F, Pierobon, Mariaelena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5558684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28664915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.195
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The biological mechanisms underlying early- and advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancers (EOCs) are still poorly understood. This study explored kinase-driven metabolic signalling in early and advanced EOCs, and its role in tumour progression and response to carboplatin–paclitaxel treatment. METHODS: Tumour epithelia were isolated from two independent sets of primary EOC (n=72 and 30 for the discovery and the validation sets, respectively) via laser capture microdissection. Reverse phase protein microarrays were used to broadly profile the kinase-driven metabolic signalling of EOC with particular emphasis on the LBK1–AMPK and AKT–mTOR axes. Signalling activation was compared between early and advanced lesions, and carboplatin–paclitaxel-sensitive and -resistant tumours. RESULTS: Advanced EOCs were characterised by a heterogeneous kinase-driven metabolic signature and decreased phosphorylation of the AMPK–AKT–mTOR axis compared to early EOC (P<0.05 for AMPKα T172, AMPKα1 S485, AMPKβ1 S108, AKT S473 and T308, mTOR S2448, p70S6 S371, 4EBP1 S65, GSK-3 α/β S21/9, FOXO1 T24/FOXO3 T32, and FOXO1 S256). Advanced tumours with low relative activation of the metabolic signature and increased FOXO1 T24/FOXO3 T32 phosphorylation (P=0.041) were associated with carboplatin–paclitaxel resistance. CONCLUSIONS: If validated in a larger cohort of patients, the decreased AMPK–AKT–mTOR activation and phosphorylation of FOXO1 T24/FOXO3 T32 may help identify carboplatin–paclitaxel-resistant EOC patients.