Cargando…

Antiarrhythmic drug therapy among patients presenting to emergency department with symptomatic atrial fibrillation – a prospective nationwide cohort

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia that causes numerous visits to emergency departments (ED). The aim of the FinFib2 study was to evaluate whether treatment of patients with AF in ED is consistent with the contemporary European Society of Cardiology (ESC) management guidelin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Penttilä, Tero, Mäkynen, Heikki, Hartikainen, Juha, Hyppölä, Harri, Lauri, Timo, Lehto, Mika, Lund, Juha, Raatikainen, MJ Pekka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5558694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28810904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-017-0424-7
_version_ 1783257428911980544
author Penttilä, Tero
Mäkynen, Heikki
Hartikainen, Juha
Hyppölä, Harri
Lauri, Timo
Lehto, Mika
Lund, Juha
Raatikainen, MJ Pekka
author_facet Penttilä, Tero
Mäkynen, Heikki
Hartikainen, Juha
Hyppölä, Harri
Lauri, Timo
Lehto, Mika
Lund, Juha
Raatikainen, MJ Pekka
author_sort Penttilä, Tero
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia that causes numerous visits to emergency departments (ED). The aim of the FinFib2 study was to evaluate whether treatment of patients with AF in ED is consistent with the contemporary European Society of Cardiology (ESC) management guidelines. Here we report the results of antiarrhythmic drug therapy (AAD) in ED. METHODS: All patients within the two-week study period whose primary reason for the ED visit was symptomatic AF were included into this prospective multicentre study. Comprehensive data on factors contributing to the treatment of AF were collected, including a data of previous use of ADDs, and changes made for them during a visit in ED. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 1013 consecutive patients (mean age 70 ± 13 years, 47.6% female). The mean European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) symptom score was 2.2 ± 0.8. Rhythm control strategy was opt for 498 (63.8%) and 140 (64.5%) patients with previously and newly diagnosed AF, respectively. In patients with previously diagnosed AF the most frequently used AAD was a beta blocker (80.9%). Prior use of class I (11.4%) and III (9.1%) AADs as well as start or adjustment of their dosage (7.4%) were uncommon. Most of the patients with newly diagnosed AF were prescribed a beta blocker (71.0%) or a calcium channel antagonist (24.0%), and only two of them received class I or class III AADs. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrated that in patients presenting to the ED with recurrent symptomatic AF and aimed for rhythm control strategy, the use of class I and class III AADs was rare despite ESC guideline recommendations. It is possible that early adaptation of a more aggressive rhythm control strategy might improve a quality of life for symptomatic patients and alleviate the ED burden associated with AF. Beta blockers were used by majority of patients as rate control therapy both in rate and rhythm control groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01990105. Registered 15 November 2013.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5558694
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55586942017-08-16 Antiarrhythmic drug therapy among patients presenting to emergency department with symptomatic atrial fibrillation – a prospective nationwide cohort Penttilä, Tero Mäkynen, Heikki Hartikainen, Juha Hyppölä, Harri Lauri, Timo Lehto, Mika Lund, Juha Raatikainen, MJ Pekka Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia that causes numerous visits to emergency departments (ED). The aim of the FinFib2 study was to evaluate whether treatment of patients with AF in ED is consistent with the contemporary European Society of Cardiology (ESC) management guidelines. Here we report the results of antiarrhythmic drug therapy (AAD) in ED. METHODS: All patients within the two-week study period whose primary reason for the ED visit was symptomatic AF were included into this prospective multicentre study. Comprehensive data on factors contributing to the treatment of AF were collected, including a data of previous use of ADDs, and changes made for them during a visit in ED. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 1013 consecutive patients (mean age 70 ± 13 years, 47.6% female). The mean European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) symptom score was 2.2 ± 0.8. Rhythm control strategy was opt for 498 (63.8%) and 140 (64.5%) patients with previously and newly diagnosed AF, respectively. In patients with previously diagnosed AF the most frequently used AAD was a beta blocker (80.9%). Prior use of class I (11.4%) and III (9.1%) AADs as well as start or adjustment of their dosage (7.4%) were uncommon. Most of the patients with newly diagnosed AF were prescribed a beta blocker (71.0%) or a calcium channel antagonist (24.0%), and only two of them received class I or class III AADs. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrated that in patients presenting to the ED with recurrent symptomatic AF and aimed for rhythm control strategy, the use of class I and class III AADs was rare despite ESC guideline recommendations. It is possible that early adaptation of a more aggressive rhythm control strategy might improve a quality of life for symptomatic patients and alleviate the ED burden associated with AF. Beta blockers were used by majority of patients as rate control therapy both in rate and rhythm control groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01990105. Registered 15 November 2013. BioMed Central 2017-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5558694/ /pubmed/28810904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-017-0424-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research
Penttilä, Tero
Mäkynen, Heikki
Hartikainen, Juha
Hyppölä, Harri
Lauri, Timo
Lehto, Mika
Lund, Juha
Raatikainen, MJ Pekka
Antiarrhythmic drug therapy among patients presenting to emergency department with symptomatic atrial fibrillation – a prospective nationwide cohort
title Antiarrhythmic drug therapy among patients presenting to emergency department with symptomatic atrial fibrillation – a prospective nationwide cohort
title_full Antiarrhythmic drug therapy among patients presenting to emergency department with symptomatic atrial fibrillation – a prospective nationwide cohort
title_fullStr Antiarrhythmic drug therapy among patients presenting to emergency department with symptomatic atrial fibrillation – a prospective nationwide cohort
title_full_unstemmed Antiarrhythmic drug therapy among patients presenting to emergency department with symptomatic atrial fibrillation – a prospective nationwide cohort
title_short Antiarrhythmic drug therapy among patients presenting to emergency department with symptomatic atrial fibrillation – a prospective nationwide cohort
title_sort antiarrhythmic drug therapy among patients presenting to emergency department with symptomatic atrial fibrillation – a prospective nationwide cohort
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5558694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28810904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-017-0424-7
work_keys_str_mv AT penttilatero antiarrhythmicdrugtherapyamongpatientspresentingtoemergencydepartmentwithsymptomaticatrialfibrillationaprospectivenationwidecohort
AT makynenheikki antiarrhythmicdrugtherapyamongpatientspresentingtoemergencydepartmentwithsymptomaticatrialfibrillationaprospectivenationwidecohort
AT hartikainenjuha antiarrhythmicdrugtherapyamongpatientspresentingtoemergencydepartmentwithsymptomaticatrialfibrillationaprospectivenationwidecohort
AT hyppolaharri antiarrhythmicdrugtherapyamongpatientspresentingtoemergencydepartmentwithsymptomaticatrialfibrillationaprospectivenationwidecohort
AT lauritimo antiarrhythmicdrugtherapyamongpatientspresentingtoemergencydepartmentwithsymptomaticatrialfibrillationaprospectivenationwidecohort
AT lehtomika antiarrhythmicdrugtherapyamongpatientspresentingtoemergencydepartmentwithsymptomaticatrialfibrillationaprospectivenationwidecohort
AT lundjuha antiarrhythmicdrugtherapyamongpatientspresentingtoemergencydepartmentwithsymptomaticatrialfibrillationaprospectivenationwidecohort
AT raatikainenmjpekka antiarrhythmicdrugtherapyamongpatientspresentingtoemergencydepartmentwithsymptomaticatrialfibrillationaprospectivenationwidecohort
AT antiarrhythmicdrugtherapyamongpatientspresentingtoemergencydepartmentwithsymptomaticatrialfibrillationaprospectivenationwidecohort