Cargando…

A survey on the perception of allergy specialists about the reimbursed grass pollen tablets for seasonal allergic rhinitis in Italy

BACKGROUND: Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is a feasible option to classical subcutaneous immunotherapy to treat respiratory allergy and is increasingly prescribed in Europe. However, the lack of reimbursement may limit its prescription. In 2015, the 5-grass pollen tablets was authorized by the Eur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Massaro, Ilaria, Rossi, Oliviero, Incorvaia, Cristoforo, Lombardi, Carlo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5558723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28814941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12948-017-0071-6
_version_ 1783257435812659200
author Massaro, Ilaria
Rossi, Oliviero
Incorvaia, Cristoforo
Lombardi, Carlo
author_facet Massaro, Ilaria
Rossi, Oliviero
Incorvaia, Cristoforo
Lombardi, Carlo
author_sort Massaro, Ilaria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is a feasible option to classical subcutaneous immunotherapy to treat respiratory allergy and is increasingly prescribed in Europe. However, the lack of reimbursement may limit its prescription. In 2015, the 5-grass pollen tablets was authorized by the European Medicine Agency to treat grass-pollen induced rhinitis and was approved in Italy for full reimbursement. We evaluated the opinions of allergy specialists after the availability of the reimbursed 5-grass pollen tablets. METHODS: A multiple choice questionnaire composed by six questions was used to assess the specialists opinion. The questionnaire was uploaded on the free access online platform SurveyMonkey. The link to access the platform was sent to all members of the Società Italiana di Asma, Allergologia e Immunologia Clinica (SIAAIC). The access to the questionnaire was anonymous. At survey ending, the access was closed and data were downloaded directly from SurveyMonkey website. RESULTS: The questionnaire was filled by 70 allergists. The majority of allergists felt as most important the concept of SLIT as a drug, the content of allergen extract mirroring the natural exposure, the pre-coseasonal schedule as the most patient’s oriented, the very good profile of tolerability and safety, the importance of the build-up phase, and the importance of checking the patient after starting immunotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The opinions of the Italian allergy specialists about the reimbursed 5-grass-pollen tablets are very positive and make likely an appropriate prescription of SLIT for grass-pollen induced rhinitis in the next years.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5558723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55587232017-08-16 A survey on the perception of allergy specialists about the reimbursed grass pollen tablets for seasonal allergic rhinitis in Italy Massaro, Ilaria Rossi, Oliviero Incorvaia, Cristoforo Lombardi, Carlo Clin Mol Allergy Research BACKGROUND: Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is a feasible option to classical subcutaneous immunotherapy to treat respiratory allergy and is increasingly prescribed in Europe. However, the lack of reimbursement may limit its prescription. In 2015, the 5-grass pollen tablets was authorized by the European Medicine Agency to treat grass-pollen induced rhinitis and was approved in Italy for full reimbursement. We evaluated the opinions of allergy specialists after the availability of the reimbursed 5-grass pollen tablets. METHODS: A multiple choice questionnaire composed by six questions was used to assess the specialists opinion. The questionnaire was uploaded on the free access online platform SurveyMonkey. The link to access the platform was sent to all members of the Società Italiana di Asma, Allergologia e Immunologia Clinica (SIAAIC). The access to the questionnaire was anonymous. At survey ending, the access was closed and data were downloaded directly from SurveyMonkey website. RESULTS: The questionnaire was filled by 70 allergists. The majority of allergists felt as most important the concept of SLIT as a drug, the content of allergen extract mirroring the natural exposure, the pre-coseasonal schedule as the most patient’s oriented, the very good profile of tolerability and safety, the importance of the build-up phase, and the importance of checking the patient after starting immunotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The opinions of the Italian allergy specialists about the reimbursed 5-grass-pollen tablets are very positive and make likely an appropriate prescription of SLIT for grass-pollen induced rhinitis in the next years. BioMed Central 2017-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5558723/ /pubmed/28814941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12948-017-0071-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Massaro, Ilaria
Rossi, Oliviero
Incorvaia, Cristoforo
Lombardi, Carlo
A survey on the perception of allergy specialists about the reimbursed grass pollen tablets for seasonal allergic rhinitis in Italy
title A survey on the perception of allergy specialists about the reimbursed grass pollen tablets for seasonal allergic rhinitis in Italy
title_full A survey on the perception of allergy specialists about the reimbursed grass pollen tablets for seasonal allergic rhinitis in Italy
title_fullStr A survey on the perception of allergy specialists about the reimbursed grass pollen tablets for seasonal allergic rhinitis in Italy
title_full_unstemmed A survey on the perception of allergy specialists about the reimbursed grass pollen tablets for seasonal allergic rhinitis in Italy
title_short A survey on the perception of allergy specialists about the reimbursed grass pollen tablets for seasonal allergic rhinitis in Italy
title_sort survey on the perception of allergy specialists about the reimbursed grass pollen tablets for seasonal allergic rhinitis in italy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5558723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28814941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12948-017-0071-6
work_keys_str_mv AT massaroilaria asurveyontheperceptionofallergyspecialistsaboutthereimbursedgrasspollentabletsforseasonalallergicrhinitisinitaly
AT rossioliviero asurveyontheperceptionofallergyspecialistsaboutthereimbursedgrasspollentabletsforseasonalallergicrhinitisinitaly
AT incorvaiacristoforo asurveyontheperceptionofallergyspecialistsaboutthereimbursedgrasspollentabletsforseasonalallergicrhinitisinitaly
AT lombardicarlo asurveyontheperceptionofallergyspecialistsaboutthereimbursedgrasspollentabletsforseasonalallergicrhinitisinitaly
AT massaroilaria surveyontheperceptionofallergyspecialistsaboutthereimbursedgrasspollentabletsforseasonalallergicrhinitisinitaly
AT rossioliviero surveyontheperceptionofallergyspecialistsaboutthereimbursedgrasspollentabletsforseasonalallergicrhinitisinitaly
AT incorvaiacristoforo surveyontheperceptionofallergyspecialistsaboutthereimbursedgrasspollentabletsforseasonalallergicrhinitisinitaly
AT lombardicarlo surveyontheperceptionofallergyspecialistsaboutthereimbursedgrasspollentabletsforseasonalallergicrhinitisinitaly