Cargando…

Comparison of PET/CT and whole-mount histopathology sections of the human prostate: a new strategy for voxel-wise evaluation

BACKGROUND: Implementation of PET/CT in diagnosis of primary prostate cancer (PCa) requires a profound knowledge about the tracer, preferably from a quantitative evaluation. Direct visual comparison of PET/CT slices to whole prostate sections is hampered by considerable uncertainties from imperfect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schiller, F., Fechter, T., Zamboglou, C., Chirindel, A., Salman, N., Jilg, C.A., Drendel, V., Werner, M., Meyer, P.T., Grosu, A.-L., Mix, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5559412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28815472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-017-0188-1
_version_ 1783257509575786496
author Schiller, F.
Fechter, T.
Zamboglou, C.
Chirindel, A.
Salman, N.
Jilg, C.A.
Drendel, V.
Werner, M.
Meyer, P.T.
Grosu, A.-L.
Mix, M.
author_facet Schiller, F.
Fechter, T.
Zamboglou, C.
Chirindel, A.
Salman, N.
Jilg, C.A.
Drendel, V.
Werner, M.
Meyer, P.T.
Grosu, A.-L.
Mix, M.
author_sort Schiller, F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Implementation of PET/CT in diagnosis of primary prostate cancer (PCa) requires a profound knowledge about the tracer, preferably from a quantitative evaluation. Direct visual comparison of PET/CT slices to whole prostate sections is hampered by considerable uncertainties from imperfect coregistration and fundamentally different image modalities. In the current study, we present a novel method for advanced voxel-wise comparison of histopathology from excised prostates to pre-surgical PET. Resected prostates from eight patients who underwent PSMA-PET/CT were scanned (ex vivo CT) and thoroughly pathologically prepared. In vivo and ex vivo CT including histopathology were coregistered with three different methods (manual, semi−/automatic). Spatial overlap after CT-based registration was evaluated with dice similarity (DSC). Furthermore, we constructed 3D cancer distribution models from histopathologic information in various slices. Subsequent smoothing reflected the intrinsically limited spatial resolution of PSMA-PET. The resulting histoPET models were used for quantitative analysis of spatial histopathology-PET pattern agreement focusing on p values and coefficients of determination (R (2)). We examined additional rigid mutual information (MI) coregistration directly based on PSMA-PET and histoPET. RESULTS: Mean DSC for the three different methods (ManReg, ScalFactReg, and DefReg) were 0.79 ± 0.06, 0.82 ± 0.04, and 0.90 ± 0.02, respectively, while quantification of PET-histopathology pattern agreement after CT-based registration revealed R (2) 45.7, 43.2, and 41.3% on average with p < 10(−5). Subsequent PET-based MI coregistration yielded R (2) 61.3, 55.9, and 55.6%, respectively, while implying anatomically plausible transformations. CONCLUSIONS: Creating 3D histoPET models based on thorough histopathological preparation allowed sophisticated quantitative analyses showing highly significant correlations between histopathology and (PSMA-)PET. We recommend manual CT-based coregistration followed by a PET-based MI algorithm to overcome limitations of purely CT-based coregistrations for meaningful voxel-wise comparisons between PET and histopathology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5559412
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55594122017-08-31 Comparison of PET/CT and whole-mount histopathology sections of the human prostate: a new strategy for voxel-wise evaluation Schiller, F. Fechter, T. Zamboglou, C. Chirindel, A. Salman, N. Jilg, C.A. Drendel, V. Werner, M. Meyer, P.T. Grosu, A.-L. Mix, M. EJNMMI Phys Original Research BACKGROUND: Implementation of PET/CT in diagnosis of primary prostate cancer (PCa) requires a profound knowledge about the tracer, preferably from a quantitative evaluation. Direct visual comparison of PET/CT slices to whole prostate sections is hampered by considerable uncertainties from imperfect coregistration and fundamentally different image modalities. In the current study, we present a novel method for advanced voxel-wise comparison of histopathology from excised prostates to pre-surgical PET. Resected prostates from eight patients who underwent PSMA-PET/CT were scanned (ex vivo CT) and thoroughly pathologically prepared. In vivo and ex vivo CT including histopathology were coregistered with three different methods (manual, semi−/automatic). Spatial overlap after CT-based registration was evaluated with dice similarity (DSC). Furthermore, we constructed 3D cancer distribution models from histopathologic information in various slices. Subsequent smoothing reflected the intrinsically limited spatial resolution of PSMA-PET. The resulting histoPET models were used for quantitative analysis of spatial histopathology-PET pattern agreement focusing on p values and coefficients of determination (R (2)). We examined additional rigid mutual information (MI) coregistration directly based on PSMA-PET and histoPET. RESULTS: Mean DSC for the three different methods (ManReg, ScalFactReg, and DefReg) were 0.79 ± 0.06, 0.82 ± 0.04, and 0.90 ± 0.02, respectively, while quantification of PET-histopathology pattern agreement after CT-based registration revealed R (2) 45.7, 43.2, and 41.3% on average with p < 10(−5). Subsequent PET-based MI coregistration yielded R (2) 61.3, 55.9, and 55.6%, respectively, while implying anatomically plausible transformations. CONCLUSIONS: Creating 3D histoPET models based on thorough histopathological preparation allowed sophisticated quantitative analyses showing highly significant correlations between histopathology and (PSMA-)PET. We recommend manual CT-based coregistration followed by a PET-based MI algorithm to overcome limitations of purely CT-based coregistrations for meaningful voxel-wise comparisons between PET and histopathology. Springer International Publishing 2017-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5559412/ /pubmed/28815472 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-017-0188-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Schiller, F.
Fechter, T.
Zamboglou, C.
Chirindel, A.
Salman, N.
Jilg, C.A.
Drendel, V.
Werner, M.
Meyer, P.T.
Grosu, A.-L.
Mix, M.
Comparison of PET/CT and whole-mount histopathology sections of the human prostate: a new strategy for voxel-wise evaluation
title Comparison of PET/CT and whole-mount histopathology sections of the human prostate: a new strategy for voxel-wise evaluation
title_full Comparison of PET/CT and whole-mount histopathology sections of the human prostate: a new strategy for voxel-wise evaluation
title_fullStr Comparison of PET/CT and whole-mount histopathology sections of the human prostate: a new strategy for voxel-wise evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of PET/CT and whole-mount histopathology sections of the human prostate: a new strategy for voxel-wise evaluation
title_short Comparison of PET/CT and whole-mount histopathology sections of the human prostate: a new strategy for voxel-wise evaluation
title_sort comparison of pet/ct and whole-mount histopathology sections of the human prostate: a new strategy for voxel-wise evaluation
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5559412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28815472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-017-0188-1
work_keys_str_mv AT schillerf comparisonofpetctandwholemounthistopathologysectionsofthehumanprostateanewstrategyforvoxelwiseevaluation
AT fechtert comparisonofpetctandwholemounthistopathologysectionsofthehumanprostateanewstrategyforvoxelwiseevaluation
AT zamboglouc comparisonofpetctandwholemounthistopathologysectionsofthehumanprostateanewstrategyforvoxelwiseevaluation
AT chirindela comparisonofpetctandwholemounthistopathologysectionsofthehumanprostateanewstrategyforvoxelwiseevaluation
AT salmann comparisonofpetctandwholemounthistopathologysectionsofthehumanprostateanewstrategyforvoxelwiseevaluation
AT jilgca comparisonofpetctandwholemounthistopathologysectionsofthehumanprostateanewstrategyforvoxelwiseevaluation
AT drendelv comparisonofpetctandwholemounthistopathologysectionsofthehumanprostateanewstrategyforvoxelwiseevaluation
AT wernerm comparisonofpetctandwholemounthistopathologysectionsofthehumanprostateanewstrategyforvoxelwiseevaluation
AT meyerpt comparisonofpetctandwholemounthistopathologysectionsofthehumanprostateanewstrategyforvoxelwiseevaluation
AT grosual comparisonofpetctandwholemounthistopathologysectionsofthehumanprostateanewstrategyforvoxelwiseevaluation
AT mixm comparisonofpetctandwholemounthistopathologysectionsofthehumanprostateanewstrategyforvoxelwiseevaluation