Cargando…

Performance, biochemical and haematological responses, and relative organ weights of laying hens fed diets supplemented with prebiotic, probiotic and synbiotic

BACKGROUND: The increasing trend of ban on the use of antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) across the globe in the poultry industry has led to a growing need for alternatives to AGPs. Prebiotic, probiotic and their combination as a synbiotic have been considered as potential alternatives. This study a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Shirley Gee Hoon, Sieo, Chin Chin, Ramasamy, Kalavathy, Saad, Wan Zuhainis, Wong, Hee Kum, Ho, Yin Wan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5559823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28814309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1160-y
_version_ 1783257585375248384
author Tang, Shirley Gee Hoon
Sieo, Chin Chin
Ramasamy, Kalavathy
Saad, Wan Zuhainis
Wong, Hee Kum
Ho, Yin Wan
author_facet Tang, Shirley Gee Hoon
Sieo, Chin Chin
Ramasamy, Kalavathy
Saad, Wan Zuhainis
Wong, Hee Kum
Ho, Yin Wan
author_sort Tang, Shirley Gee Hoon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The increasing trend of ban on the use of antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) across the globe in the poultry industry has led to a growing need for alternatives to AGPs. Prebiotic, probiotic and their combination as a synbiotic have been considered as potential alternatives. This study aimed to investigate the effects of a prebiotic (isomaltooligosaccharide, IMO), a probiotic (PrimaLac®), and their combination (synbiotic) on hen performance, biochemical and haematological responses, and relative organ weights from 20 to 52 weeks of age. RESULTS: Supplementation of 1% IMO (PRE), 0.1% PrimaLac® (PRO) and 1% IMO + 0.1% PrimaLac® (SYN) improved (P < 0.05) feed intake and egg production at 20–36 weeks of age; body weight gain, feed conversion ratio and egg mass at 20–36 and 20–52 weeks of age; and egg weight at 20–36, 37–52 and 20–52 weeks of age. Compared to control-fed hens at 20–36 weeks of age, PRO- and SYN-fed hens produced less (P < 0.05) small size eggs while SYN-fed hens produced more large size eggs. From 37 to 52 weeks of age, PRE-, PRO- or SYN-fed hens produced less (P < 0.05) medium size eggs, and more large and extra-large size eggs. PRE, PRO or SYN supplementation decreased (P < 0.05) the serum total cholesterol at 36 weeks of age, and serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) at 36 and 52 weeks of age. At 36 and 52 weeks of age, supplementation of PRE, PRO or SYN increased (P < 0.05) lymphocyte percentage and decreased (P < 0.05) heterophil percentage, leading to a lower heterophil to lymphocyte (H/L) ratio. No significant differences were observed in the relative weights of the heart, liver, ovary, pancreas and spleen of all dietary treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Supplementation of PRE, PRO or SYN improved performance, serum total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, ALT, ALP and H/L ratio of hens from 20 to 52 weeks of age. These results demonstrated the use of PRE, PRO and SYN as alternative feed additives to AGPs for improving the health and productivity of hens, while PRO is the best for commercial layer production to yield maximum profit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5559823
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55598232017-08-18 Performance, biochemical and haematological responses, and relative organ weights of laying hens fed diets supplemented with prebiotic, probiotic and synbiotic Tang, Shirley Gee Hoon Sieo, Chin Chin Ramasamy, Kalavathy Saad, Wan Zuhainis Wong, Hee Kum Ho, Yin Wan BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The increasing trend of ban on the use of antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) across the globe in the poultry industry has led to a growing need for alternatives to AGPs. Prebiotic, probiotic and their combination as a synbiotic have been considered as potential alternatives. This study aimed to investigate the effects of a prebiotic (isomaltooligosaccharide, IMO), a probiotic (PrimaLac®), and their combination (synbiotic) on hen performance, biochemical and haematological responses, and relative organ weights from 20 to 52 weeks of age. RESULTS: Supplementation of 1% IMO (PRE), 0.1% PrimaLac® (PRO) and 1% IMO + 0.1% PrimaLac® (SYN) improved (P < 0.05) feed intake and egg production at 20–36 weeks of age; body weight gain, feed conversion ratio and egg mass at 20–36 and 20–52 weeks of age; and egg weight at 20–36, 37–52 and 20–52 weeks of age. Compared to control-fed hens at 20–36 weeks of age, PRO- and SYN-fed hens produced less (P < 0.05) small size eggs while SYN-fed hens produced more large size eggs. From 37 to 52 weeks of age, PRE-, PRO- or SYN-fed hens produced less (P < 0.05) medium size eggs, and more large and extra-large size eggs. PRE, PRO or SYN supplementation decreased (P < 0.05) the serum total cholesterol at 36 weeks of age, and serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) at 36 and 52 weeks of age. At 36 and 52 weeks of age, supplementation of PRE, PRO or SYN increased (P < 0.05) lymphocyte percentage and decreased (P < 0.05) heterophil percentage, leading to a lower heterophil to lymphocyte (H/L) ratio. No significant differences were observed in the relative weights of the heart, liver, ovary, pancreas and spleen of all dietary treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Supplementation of PRE, PRO or SYN improved performance, serum total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, ALT, ALP and H/L ratio of hens from 20 to 52 weeks of age. These results demonstrated the use of PRE, PRO and SYN as alternative feed additives to AGPs for improving the health and productivity of hens, while PRO is the best for commercial layer production to yield maximum profit. BioMed Central 2017-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5559823/ /pubmed/28814309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1160-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tang, Shirley Gee Hoon
Sieo, Chin Chin
Ramasamy, Kalavathy
Saad, Wan Zuhainis
Wong, Hee Kum
Ho, Yin Wan
Performance, biochemical and haematological responses, and relative organ weights of laying hens fed diets supplemented with prebiotic, probiotic and synbiotic
title Performance, biochemical and haematological responses, and relative organ weights of laying hens fed diets supplemented with prebiotic, probiotic and synbiotic
title_full Performance, biochemical and haematological responses, and relative organ weights of laying hens fed diets supplemented with prebiotic, probiotic and synbiotic
title_fullStr Performance, biochemical and haematological responses, and relative organ weights of laying hens fed diets supplemented with prebiotic, probiotic and synbiotic
title_full_unstemmed Performance, biochemical and haematological responses, and relative organ weights of laying hens fed diets supplemented with prebiotic, probiotic and synbiotic
title_short Performance, biochemical and haematological responses, and relative organ weights of laying hens fed diets supplemented with prebiotic, probiotic and synbiotic
title_sort performance, biochemical and haematological responses, and relative organ weights of laying hens fed diets supplemented with prebiotic, probiotic and synbiotic
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5559823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28814309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1160-y
work_keys_str_mv AT tangshirleygeehoon performancebiochemicalandhaematologicalresponsesandrelativeorganweightsoflayinghensfeddietssupplementedwithprebioticprobioticandsynbiotic
AT sieochinchin performancebiochemicalandhaematologicalresponsesandrelativeorganweightsoflayinghensfeddietssupplementedwithprebioticprobioticandsynbiotic
AT ramasamykalavathy performancebiochemicalandhaematologicalresponsesandrelativeorganweightsoflayinghensfeddietssupplementedwithprebioticprobioticandsynbiotic
AT saadwanzuhainis performancebiochemicalandhaematologicalresponsesandrelativeorganweightsoflayinghensfeddietssupplementedwithprebioticprobioticandsynbiotic
AT wongheekum performancebiochemicalandhaematologicalresponsesandrelativeorganweightsoflayinghensfeddietssupplementedwithprebioticprobioticandsynbiotic
AT hoyinwan performancebiochemicalandhaematologicalresponsesandrelativeorganweightsoflayinghensfeddietssupplementedwithprebioticprobioticandsynbiotic