Cargando…

Dermoscopic features and types of orf and milker’s nodule

INTRODUCTION: Orf and milker’s nodule are zoonotic cutaneous diseases generated by parapoxviruses. Contribution of dermoscopy to the diagnosis of these diseases has not been studied in the medical literature as to our knowledge. AIM: To investigate whether dermoscopy is a valuable diagnostic tool in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ayhan, Erhan, Aktaş, Hamza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5560185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28951712
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ada.2017.69317
_version_ 1783257645394690048
author Ayhan, Erhan
Aktaş, Hamza
author_facet Ayhan, Erhan
Aktaş, Hamza
author_sort Ayhan, Erhan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Orf and milker’s nodule are zoonotic cutaneous diseases generated by parapoxviruses. Contribution of dermoscopy to the diagnosis of these diseases has not been studied in the medical literature as to our knowledge. AIM: To investigate whether dermoscopy is a valuable diagnostic tool in orf and milker’s nodule diagnosis or not. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study, macroscopic and dermoscopic features have been evaluated by including 46 lesions of 32 patients who have orf and milker’s nodule. RESULTS: 56.5% (26) of lesions were orf, while 43.5% (20) of lesions were milker’s nodule (MN). Non-vascular dermoscopic structures have been determined as follows: blue-gray area (23.1% of orf, 35% of MN), orange-yellow streaks (19.2% of orf, 19.2% of MN), grayish-whitish streaks (26.9% of orf, 55% of MN), central yellow-white area (26.9% of orf, 35% of MN), crust (46.2% of orf, 40% of MN), erosion-ulceration (69.2% of orf, 55% of MN), yellow-white globule (11.5% of orf, 15% of MN), and yellow-white ring (57.7% of orf, 35% of MN). Limitations: Lack of PCR analysis, based of patient anamnesis types of orf and milker’s nodule. CONCLUSIONS: No significant dermoscopic differences have been determined between orf and milker’s nodule patients’ lesions. In our opinion, dermoscopy may be a useful tool to develop diagnosis of these diseases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5560185
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55601852017-09-26 Dermoscopic features and types of orf and milker’s nodule Ayhan, Erhan Aktaş, Hamza Postepy Dermatol Alergol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Orf and milker’s nodule are zoonotic cutaneous diseases generated by parapoxviruses. Contribution of dermoscopy to the diagnosis of these diseases has not been studied in the medical literature as to our knowledge. AIM: To investigate whether dermoscopy is a valuable diagnostic tool in orf and milker’s nodule diagnosis or not. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study, macroscopic and dermoscopic features have been evaluated by including 46 lesions of 32 patients who have orf and milker’s nodule. RESULTS: 56.5% (26) of lesions were orf, while 43.5% (20) of lesions were milker’s nodule (MN). Non-vascular dermoscopic structures have been determined as follows: blue-gray area (23.1% of orf, 35% of MN), orange-yellow streaks (19.2% of orf, 19.2% of MN), grayish-whitish streaks (26.9% of orf, 55% of MN), central yellow-white area (26.9% of orf, 35% of MN), crust (46.2% of orf, 40% of MN), erosion-ulceration (69.2% of orf, 55% of MN), yellow-white globule (11.5% of orf, 15% of MN), and yellow-white ring (57.7% of orf, 35% of MN). Limitations: Lack of PCR analysis, based of patient anamnesis types of orf and milker’s nodule. CONCLUSIONS: No significant dermoscopic differences have been determined between orf and milker’s nodule patients’ lesions. In our opinion, dermoscopy may be a useful tool to develop diagnosis of these diseases. Termedia Publishing House 2017-08-02 2017-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5560185/ /pubmed/28951712 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ada.2017.69317 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Termedia Sp. z o. o. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Ayhan, Erhan
Aktaş, Hamza
Dermoscopic features and types of orf and milker’s nodule
title Dermoscopic features and types of orf and milker’s nodule
title_full Dermoscopic features and types of orf and milker’s nodule
title_fullStr Dermoscopic features and types of orf and milker’s nodule
title_full_unstemmed Dermoscopic features and types of orf and milker’s nodule
title_short Dermoscopic features and types of orf and milker’s nodule
title_sort dermoscopic features and types of orf and milker’s nodule
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5560185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28951712
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ada.2017.69317
work_keys_str_mv AT ayhanerhan dermoscopicfeaturesandtypesoforfandmilkersnodule
AT aktashamza dermoscopicfeaturesandtypesoforfandmilkersnodule