Cargando…

The link between bond forfeiture and pretrial release mechanism: The case of Dallas County, Texas

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of four pretrial jail release mechanisms (i.e., bond types) commonly used during the pretrial phase of the criminal justice process in terms of their ability to discriminate between defendants failing to appear in court (i.e., bond forfeit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clipper, Stephen J., Morris, Robert G., Russell-Kaplan, Amanda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5560530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28817579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182772
_version_ 1783257674512596992
author Clipper, Stephen J.
Morris, Robert G.
Russell-Kaplan, Amanda
author_facet Clipper, Stephen J.
Morris, Robert G.
Russell-Kaplan, Amanda
author_sort Clipper, Stephen J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of four pretrial jail release mechanisms (i.e., bond types) commonly used during the pretrial phase of the criminal justice process in terms of their ability to discriminate between defendants failing to appear in court (i.e., bond forfeiture). These include attorney bonds, cash bonds, commercial bail bonds, and release via a pretrial services agency. METHODS: A multi-treatment propensity score matching protocol was employed to assess between-release-mechanism differences in the conditional probability of failure to appear/bond forfeiture. Data were culled from archival state justice records comprising all defendants booked into the Dallas County, Texas jail during 2008 (n = 29,416). RESULTS: The results suggest that defendants released via commercial bail bonds were less likely to experience failure to appear leading to the bond forfeiture process compared to equivalent defendants released via cash, attorney, and pretrial services bonds. This finding held across different offense categories. The study frames these differences within a discussion encompassing procedural variation within and between each release mechanism, thereby setting the stage for further research and dialog regarding potential justice reform.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5560530
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55605302017-08-25 The link between bond forfeiture and pretrial release mechanism: The case of Dallas County, Texas Clipper, Stephen J. Morris, Robert G. Russell-Kaplan, Amanda PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of four pretrial jail release mechanisms (i.e., bond types) commonly used during the pretrial phase of the criminal justice process in terms of their ability to discriminate between defendants failing to appear in court (i.e., bond forfeiture). These include attorney bonds, cash bonds, commercial bail bonds, and release via a pretrial services agency. METHODS: A multi-treatment propensity score matching protocol was employed to assess between-release-mechanism differences in the conditional probability of failure to appear/bond forfeiture. Data were culled from archival state justice records comprising all defendants booked into the Dallas County, Texas jail during 2008 (n = 29,416). RESULTS: The results suggest that defendants released via commercial bail bonds were less likely to experience failure to appear leading to the bond forfeiture process compared to equivalent defendants released via cash, attorney, and pretrial services bonds. This finding held across different offense categories. The study frames these differences within a discussion encompassing procedural variation within and between each release mechanism, thereby setting the stage for further research and dialog regarding potential justice reform. Public Library of Science 2017-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5560530/ /pubmed/28817579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182772 Text en © 2017 Clipper et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Clipper, Stephen J.
Morris, Robert G.
Russell-Kaplan, Amanda
The link between bond forfeiture and pretrial release mechanism: The case of Dallas County, Texas
title The link between bond forfeiture and pretrial release mechanism: The case of Dallas County, Texas
title_full The link between bond forfeiture and pretrial release mechanism: The case of Dallas County, Texas
title_fullStr The link between bond forfeiture and pretrial release mechanism: The case of Dallas County, Texas
title_full_unstemmed The link between bond forfeiture and pretrial release mechanism: The case of Dallas County, Texas
title_short The link between bond forfeiture and pretrial release mechanism: The case of Dallas County, Texas
title_sort link between bond forfeiture and pretrial release mechanism: the case of dallas county, texas
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5560530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28817579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182772
work_keys_str_mv AT clipperstephenj thelinkbetweenbondforfeitureandpretrialreleasemechanismthecaseofdallascountytexas
AT morrisrobertg thelinkbetweenbondforfeitureandpretrialreleasemechanismthecaseofdallascountytexas
AT russellkaplanamanda thelinkbetweenbondforfeitureandpretrialreleasemechanismthecaseofdallascountytexas
AT clipperstephenj linkbetweenbondforfeitureandpretrialreleasemechanismthecaseofdallascountytexas
AT morrisrobertg linkbetweenbondforfeitureandpretrialreleasemechanismthecaseofdallascountytexas
AT russellkaplanamanda linkbetweenbondforfeitureandpretrialreleasemechanismthecaseofdallascountytexas