Cargando…

Investigation of the halo-artifact in (68)Ga-PSMA-11-PET/MRI

OBJECTIVES: Combined positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) with a (68)Ga-labelled PSMA-analog ((68)Ga-PSMA-11) is discussed as a promising diagnostic method for patients with suspicion or history of prostate ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heußer, Thorsten, Mann, Philipp, Rank, Christopher M., Schäfer, Martin, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, Antonia, Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter, Hadaschik, Boris A., Kopka, Klaus, Bachert, Peter, Kachelrieß, Marc, Freitag, Martin T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5560715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28817656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183329
_version_ 1783257710938030080
author Heußer, Thorsten
Mann, Philipp
Rank, Christopher M.
Schäfer, Martin
Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, Antonia
Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
Hadaschik, Boris A.
Kopka, Klaus
Bachert, Peter
Kachelrieß, Marc
Freitag, Martin T.
author_facet Heußer, Thorsten
Mann, Philipp
Rank, Christopher M.
Schäfer, Martin
Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, Antonia
Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
Hadaschik, Boris A.
Kopka, Klaus
Bachert, Peter
Kachelrieß, Marc
Freitag, Martin T.
author_sort Heußer, Thorsten
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Combined positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) with a (68)Ga-labelled PSMA-analog ((68)Ga-PSMA-11) is discussed as a promising diagnostic method for patients with suspicion or history of prostate cancer. One potential drawback of this method are severe photopenic (halo-) artifacts surrounding the bladder and the kidneys in the scatter-corrected PET images, which have been reported to occur frequently in clinical practice. The goal of this work was to investigate the occurrence and impact of these artifacts and, secondly, to evaluate variants of the standard scatter correction method with regard to halo-artifact suppression. METHODS: Experiments using a dedicated pelvis phantom were conducted to investigate whether the halo-artifact is modality-, tracer-, and/or concentration-dependent. Furthermore, 31 patients with history of prostate cancer were selected from an ongoing (68)Ga-PSMA-11-PET/MRI study. For each patient, PET raw data were reconstructed employing six different variants of PET scatter correction: absolute scatter scaling, relative scatter scaling, and relative scatter scaling combined with prompt gamma correction, each of which was combined with a maximum scatter fraction (MaxSF) of MaxSF = 75% or MaxSF = 40%. Evaluation of the reconstructed images with regard to halo-artifact suppression was performed both quantitatively using statistical analysis and qualitatively by two independent readers. RESULTS: The phantom experiments did not reveal any modality-dependency (PET/MRI vs. PET/CT) or tracer-dependency ((68)Ga vs. (18)F-FDG). Patient- and phantom-based data indicated that halo-artifacts derive from high organ-to-background activity ratios (OBR) between bladder/kidneys and surrounding soft tissue, with a positive correlation between OBR and halo size. Comparing different variants of scatter correction, reducing the maximum scatter fraction from the default value MaxSF = 75% to MaxSF = 40% was found to efficiently suppress halo-artifacts in both phantom and patient data. In 1 of 31 patients, reducing the maximum scatter fraction provided new PET-based information changing the patient’s diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Halo-artifacts are particularly observed for (68)Ga-PSMA-11-PET/MRI due to 1) the biodistribution of the PSMA-11-tracer resulting in large OBRs for bladder and kidneys and 2) inaccurate scatter correction methods currently used in clinical routine, which tend to overestimate the scatter contribution. If not compensated for, (68)Ga-PSMA-11 uptake pathologies may be masked by halo-artifacts leading to false-negative diagnoses. Reducing the maximum scatter fraction was found to efficiently suppress halo-artifacts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5560715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55607152017-08-25 Investigation of the halo-artifact in (68)Ga-PSMA-11-PET/MRI Heußer, Thorsten Mann, Philipp Rank, Christopher M. Schäfer, Martin Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, Antonia Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter Hadaschik, Boris A. Kopka, Klaus Bachert, Peter Kachelrieß, Marc Freitag, Martin T. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: Combined positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) with a (68)Ga-labelled PSMA-analog ((68)Ga-PSMA-11) is discussed as a promising diagnostic method for patients with suspicion or history of prostate cancer. One potential drawback of this method are severe photopenic (halo-) artifacts surrounding the bladder and the kidneys in the scatter-corrected PET images, which have been reported to occur frequently in clinical practice. The goal of this work was to investigate the occurrence and impact of these artifacts and, secondly, to evaluate variants of the standard scatter correction method with regard to halo-artifact suppression. METHODS: Experiments using a dedicated pelvis phantom were conducted to investigate whether the halo-artifact is modality-, tracer-, and/or concentration-dependent. Furthermore, 31 patients with history of prostate cancer were selected from an ongoing (68)Ga-PSMA-11-PET/MRI study. For each patient, PET raw data were reconstructed employing six different variants of PET scatter correction: absolute scatter scaling, relative scatter scaling, and relative scatter scaling combined with prompt gamma correction, each of which was combined with a maximum scatter fraction (MaxSF) of MaxSF = 75% or MaxSF = 40%. Evaluation of the reconstructed images with regard to halo-artifact suppression was performed both quantitatively using statistical analysis and qualitatively by two independent readers. RESULTS: The phantom experiments did not reveal any modality-dependency (PET/MRI vs. PET/CT) or tracer-dependency ((68)Ga vs. (18)F-FDG). Patient- and phantom-based data indicated that halo-artifacts derive from high organ-to-background activity ratios (OBR) between bladder/kidneys and surrounding soft tissue, with a positive correlation between OBR and halo size. Comparing different variants of scatter correction, reducing the maximum scatter fraction from the default value MaxSF = 75% to MaxSF = 40% was found to efficiently suppress halo-artifacts in both phantom and patient data. In 1 of 31 patients, reducing the maximum scatter fraction provided new PET-based information changing the patient’s diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Halo-artifacts are particularly observed for (68)Ga-PSMA-11-PET/MRI due to 1) the biodistribution of the PSMA-11-tracer resulting in large OBRs for bladder and kidneys and 2) inaccurate scatter correction methods currently used in clinical routine, which tend to overestimate the scatter contribution. If not compensated for, (68)Ga-PSMA-11 uptake pathologies may be masked by halo-artifacts leading to false-negative diagnoses. Reducing the maximum scatter fraction was found to efficiently suppress halo-artifacts. Public Library of Science 2017-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5560715/ /pubmed/28817656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183329 Text en © 2017 Heußer et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Heußer, Thorsten
Mann, Philipp
Rank, Christopher M.
Schäfer, Martin
Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, Antonia
Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
Hadaschik, Boris A.
Kopka, Klaus
Bachert, Peter
Kachelrieß, Marc
Freitag, Martin T.
Investigation of the halo-artifact in (68)Ga-PSMA-11-PET/MRI
title Investigation of the halo-artifact in (68)Ga-PSMA-11-PET/MRI
title_full Investigation of the halo-artifact in (68)Ga-PSMA-11-PET/MRI
title_fullStr Investigation of the halo-artifact in (68)Ga-PSMA-11-PET/MRI
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of the halo-artifact in (68)Ga-PSMA-11-PET/MRI
title_short Investigation of the halo-artifact in (68)Ga-PSMA-11-PET/MRI
title_sort investigation of the halo-artifact in (68)ga-psma-11-pet/mri
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5560715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28817656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183329
work_keys_str_mv AT heußerthorsten investigationofthehaloartifactin68gapsma11petmri
AT mannphilipp investigationofthehaloartifactin68gapsma11petmri
AT rankchristopherm investigationofthehaloartifactin68gapsma11petmri
AT schafermartin investigationofthehaloartifactin68gapsma11petmri
AT dimitrakopouloustraussantonia investigationofthehaloartifactin68gapsma11petmri
AT schlemmerheinzpeter investigationofthehaloartifactin68gapsma11petmri
AT hadaschikborisa investigationofthehaloartifactin68gapsma11petmri
AT kopkaklaus investigationofthehaloartifactin68gapsma11petmri
AT bachertpeter investigationofthehaloartifactin68gapsma11petmri
AT kachelrießmarc investigationofthehaloartifactin68gapsma11petmri
AT freitagmartint investigationofthehaloartifactin68gapsma11petmri