Cargando…

Working Memory Replay Prioritizes Weakly Attended Events

One view of working memory posits that maintaining a series of events requires their sequential and equal mnemonic replay. Another view is that the content of working memory maintenance is prioritized by attention. We decoded the dynamics for retaining a sequence of items using magnetoencephalograph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jafarpour, Anna, Penny, Will, Barnes, Gareth, Knight, Robert T., Duzel, Emrah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society for Neuroscience 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5560742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28824955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0171-17.2017
_version_ 1783257717036548096
author Jafarpour, Anna
Penny, Will
Barnes, Gareth
Knight, Robert T.
Duzel, Emrah
author_facet Jafarpour, Anna
Penny, Will
Barnes, Gareth
Knight, Robert T.
Duzel, Emrah
author_sort Jafarpour, Anna
collection PubMed
description One view of working memory posits that maintaining a series of events requires their sequential and equal mnemonic replay. Another view is that the content of working memory maintenance is prioritized by attention. We decoded the dynamics for retaining a sequence of items using magnetoencephalography, wherein participants encoded sequences of three stimuli depicting a face, a manufactured object, or a natural item and maintained them in working memory for 5000 ms. Memory for sequence position and stimulus details were probed at the end of the maintenance period. Decoding of brain activity revealed that one of the three stimuli dominated maintenance independent of its sequence position or category; and memory was enhanced for the selectively replayed stimulus. Analysis of event-related responses during the encoding of the sequence showed that the selectively replayed stimuli were determined by the degree of attention at encoding. The selectively replayed stimuli had the weakest initial encoding indexed by weaker visual attention signals at encoding. These findings do not rule out sequential mnemonic replay but reveal that attention influences the content of working memory maintenance by prioritizing replay of weakly encoded events. We propose that the prioritization of weakly encoded stimuli protects them from interference during the maintenance period, whereas the more strongly encoded stimuli can be retrieved from long-term memory at the end of the delay period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5560742
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Society for Neuroscience
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55607422017-08-18 Working Memory Replay Prioritizes Weakly Attended Events Jafarpour, Anna Penny, Will Barnes, Gareth Knight, Robert T. Duzel, Emrah eNeuro New Research One view of working memory posits that maintaining a series of events requires their sequential and equal mnemonic replay. Another view is that the content of working memory maintenance is prioritized by attention. We decoded the dynamics for retaining a sequence of items using magnetoencephalography, wherein participants encoded sequences of three stimuli depicting a face, a manufactured object, or a natural item and maintained them in working memory for 5000 ms. Memory for sequence position and stimulus details were probed at the end of the maintenance period. Decoding of brain activity revealed that one of the three stimuli dominated maintenance independent of its sequence position or category; and memory was enhanced for the selectively replayed stimulus. Analysis of event-related responses during the encoding of the sequence showed that the selectively replayed stimuli were determined by the degree of attention at encoding. The selectively replayed stimuli had the weakest initial encoding indexed by weaker visual attention signals at encoding. These findings do not rule out sequential mnemonic replay but reveal that attention influences the content of working memory maintenance by prioritizing replay of weakly encoded events. We propose that the prioritization of weakly encoded stimuli protects them from interference during the maintenance period, whereas the more strongly encoded stimuli can be retrieved from long-term memory at the end of the delay period. Society for Neuroscience 2017-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5560742/ /pubmed/28824955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0171-17.2017 Text en Copyright © 2017 Jafarpour et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle New Research
Jafarpour, Anna
Penny, Will
Barnes, Gareth
Knight, Robert T.
Duzel, Emrah
Working Memory Replay Prioritizes Weakly Attended Events
title Working Memory Replay Prioritizes Weakly Attended Events
title_full Working Memory Replay Prioritizes Weakly Attended Events
title_fullStr Working Memory Replay Prioritizes Weakly Attended Events
title_full_unstemmed Working Memory Replay Prioritizes Weakly Attended Events
title_short Working Memory Replay Prioritizes Weakly Attended Events
title_sort working memory replay prioritizes weakly attended events
topic New Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5560742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28824955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0171-17.2017
work_keys_str_mv AT jafarpouranna workingmemoryreplayprioritizesweaklyattendedevents
AT pennywill workingmemoryreplayprioritizesweaklyattendedevents
AT barnesgareth workingmemoryreplayprioritizesweaklyattendedevents
AT knightrobertt workingmemoryreplayprioritizesweaklyattendedevents
AT duzelemrah workingmemoryreplayprioritizesweaklyattendedevents