Cargando…
The saliva microbiome profiles are minimally affected by collection method or DNA extraction protocols
Saliva has attracted attention as a diagnostic fluid due to the association of oral microbiota with systemic diseases. However, the lack of standardised methods for saliva collection has led to the slow uptake of saliva in microbiome research. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5561025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28819242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07885-3 |
_version_ | 1783257757041819648 |
---|---|
author | Lim, Yenkai Totsika, Makrina Morrison, Mark Punyadeera, Chamindie |
author_facet | Lim, Yenkai Totsika, Makrina Morrison, Mark Punyadeera, Chamindie |
author_sort | Lim, Yenkai |
collection | PubMed |
description | Saliva has attracted attention as a diagnostic fluid due to the association of oral microbiota with systemic diseases. However, the lack of standardised methods for saliva collection has led to the slow uptake of saliva in microbiome research. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the potential effects on salivary microbiome profiles using different methods of saliva collection, storage and gDNA extraction. Three types of saliva fractions were collected from healthy individuals with or without the gDNA stabilising buffer. Subsequently, three types of gDNA extraction methods were evaluated to determine the gDNA extraction efficiencies from saliva samples. The purity of total bacterial gDNA was evaluated using the ratio of human β-globin to bacterial 16S rRNA PCR while 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing was carried out to identify the bacterial profiles present in these samples. The quantity and quality of extracted gDNA were similar among all three gDNA extraction methods and there were no statistically significant differences in the bacterial profiles among different saliva fractions at the genus-level of taxonomic classification. In conclusion, saliva sampling, processing and gDNA preparation do not have major influence on microbiome profiles. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5561025 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55610252017-08-18 The saliva microbiome profiles are minimally affected by collection method or DNA extraction protocols Lim, Yenkai Totsika, Makrina Morrison, Mark Punyadeera, Chamindie Sci Rep Article Saliva has attracted attention as a diagnostic fluid due to the association of oral microbiota with systemic diseases. However, the lack of standardised methods for saliva collection has led to the slow uptake of saliva in microbiome research. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the potential effects on salivary microbiome profiles using different methods of saliva collection, storage and gDNA extraction. Three types of saliva fractions were collected from healthy individuals with or without the gDNA stabilising buffer. Subsequently, three types of gDNA extraction methods were evaluated to determine the gDNA extraction efficiencies from saliva samples. The purity of total bacterial gDNA was evaluated using the ratio of human β-globin to bacterial 16S rRNA PCR while 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing was carried out to identify the bacterial profiles present in these samples. The quantity and quality of extracted gDNA were similar among all three gDNA extraction methods and there were no statistically significant differences in the bacterial profiles among different saliva fractions at the genus-level of taxonomic classification. In conclusion, saliva sampling, processing and gDNA preparation do not have major influence on microbiome profiles. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5561025/ /pubmed/28819242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07885-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Lim, Yenkai Totsika, Makrina Morrison, Mark Punyadeera, Chamindie The saliva microbiome profiles are minimally affected by collection method or DNA extraction protocols |
title | The saliva microbiome profiles are minimally affected by collection method or DNA extraction protocols |
title_full | The saliva microbiome profiles are minimally affected by collection method or DNA extraction protocols |
title_fullStr | The saliva microbiome profiles are minimally affected by collection method or DNA extraction protocols |
title_full_unstemmed | The saliva microbiome profiles are minimally affected by collection method or DNA extraction protocols |
title_short | The saliva microbiome profiles are minimally affected by collection method or DNA extraction protocols |
title_sort | saliva microbiome profiles are minimally affected by collection method or dna extraction protocols |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5561025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28819242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07885-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT limyenkai thesalivamicrobiomeprofilesareminimallyaffectedbycollectionmethodordnaextractionprotocols AT totsikamakrina thesalivamicrobiomeprofilesareminimallyaffectedbycollectionmethodordnaextractionprotocols AT morrisonmark thesalivamicrobiomeprofilesareminimallyaffectedbycollectionmethodordnaextractionprotocols AT punyadeerachamindie thesalivamicrobiomeprofilesareminimallyaffectedbycollectionmethodordnaextractionprotocols AT limyenkai salivamicrobiomeprofilesareminimallyaffectedbycollectionmethodordnaextractionprotocols AT totsikamakrina salivamicrobiomeprofilesareminimallyaffectedbycollectionmethodordnaextractionprotocols AT morrisonmark salivamicrobiomeprofilesareminimallyaffectedbycollectionmethodordnaextractionprotocols AT punyadeerachamindie salivamicrobiomeprofilesareminimallyaffectedbycollectionmethodordnaextractionprotocols |