Cargando…

The saliva microbiome profiles are minimally affected by collection method or DNA extraction protocols

Saliva has attracted attention as a diagnostic fluid due to the association of oral microbiota with systemic diseases. However, the lack of standardised methods for saliva collection has led to the slow uptake of saliva in microbiome research. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lim, Yenkai, Totsika, Makrina, Morrison, Mark, Punyadeera, Chamindie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5561025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28819242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07885-3
_version_ 1783257757041819648
author Lim, Yenkai
Totsika, Makrina
Morrison, Mark
Punyadeera, Chamindie
author_facet Lim, Yenkai
Totsika, Makrina
Morrison, Mark
Punyadeera, Chamindie
author_sort Lim, Yenkai
collection PubMed
description Saliva has attracted attention as a diagnostic fluid due to the association of oral microbiota with systemic diseases. However, the lack of standardised methods for saliva collection has led to the slow uptake of saliva in microbiome research. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the potential effects on salivary microbiome profiles using different methods of saliva collection, storage and gDNA extraction. Three types of saliva fractions were collected from healthy individuals with or without the gDNA stabilising buffer. Subsequently, three types of gDNA extraction methods were evaluated to determine the gDNA extraction efficiencies from saliva samples. The purity of total bacterial gDNA was evaluated using the ratio of human β-globin to bacterial 16S rRNA PCR while 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing was carried out to identify the bacterial profiles present in these samples. The quantity and quality of extracted gDNA were similar among all three gDNA extraction methods and there were no statistically significant differences in the bacterial profiles among different saliva fractions at the genus-level of taxonomic classification. In conclusion, saliva sampling, processing and gDNA preparation do not have major influence on microbiome profiles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5561025
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55610252017-08-18 The saliva microbiome profiles are minimally affected by collection method or DNA extraction protocols Lim, Yenkai Totsika, Makrina Morrison, Mark Punyadeera, Chamindie Sci Rep Article Saliva has attracted attention as a diagnostic fluid due to the association of oral microbiota with systemic diseases. However, the lack of standardised methods for saliva collection has led to the slow uptake of saliva in microbiome research. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the potential effects on salivary microbiome profiles using different methods of saliva collection, storage and gDNA extraction. Three types of saliva fractions were collected from healthy individuals with or without the gDNA stabilising buffer. Subsequently, three types of gDNA extraction methods were evaluated to determine the gDNA extraction efficiencies from saliva samples. The purity of total bacterial gDNA was evaluated using the ratio of human β-globin to bacterial 16S rRNA PCR while 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing was carried out to identify the bacterial profiles present in these samples. The quantity and quality of extracted gDNA were similar among all three gDNA extraction methods and there were no statistically significant differences in the bacterial profiles among different saliva fractions at the genus-level of taxonomic classification. In conclusion, saliva sampling, processing and gDNA preparation do not have major influence on microbiome profiles. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5561025/ /pubmed/28819242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07885-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Lim, Yenkai
Totsika, Makrina
Morrison, Mark
Punyadeera, Chamindie
The saliva microbiome profiles are minimally affected by collection method or DNA extraction protocols
title The saliva microbiome profiles are minimally affected by collection method or DNA extraction protocols
title_full The saliva microbiome profiles are minimally affected by collection method or DNA extraction protocols
title_fullStr The saliva microbiome profiles are minimally affected by collection method or DNA extraction protocols
title_full_unstemmed The saliva microbiome profiles are minimally affected by collection method or DNA extraction protocols
title_short The saliva microbiome profiles are minimally affected by collection method or DNA extraction protocols
title_sort saliva microbiome profiles are minimally affected by collection method or dna extraction protocols
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5561025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28819242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07885-3
work_keys_str_mv AT limyenkai thesalivamicrobiomeprofilesareminimallyaffectedbycollectionmethodordnaextractionprotocols
AT totsikamakrina thesalivamicrobiomeprofilesareminimallyaffectedbycollectionmethodordnaextractionprotocols
AT morrisonmark thesalivamicrobiomeprofilesareminimallyaffectedbycollectionmethodordnaextractionprotocols
AT punyadeerachamindie thesalivamicrobiomeprofilesareminimallyaffectedbycollectionmethodordnaextractionprotocols
AT limyenkai salivamicrobiomeprofilesareminimallyaffectedbycollectionmethodordnaextractionprotocols
AT totsikamakrina salivamicrobiomeprofilesareminimallyaffectedbycollectionmethodordnaextractionprotocols
AT morrisonmark salivamicrobiomeprofilesareminimallyaffectedbycollectionmethodordnaextractionprotocols
AT punyadeerachamindie salivamicrobiomeprofilesareminimallyaffectedbycollectionmethodordnaextractionprotocols