Cargando…
Do we really need more evidence to use hepatitis C positive donor kidney more liberally?
The number of patients listed active for kidney transplantation has continued to rise over the last 10 years, leading to significantly increased wait-list time for patients awaiting kidney transplantation in the USA. This increased demand has led to a supply–demand mismatch and should prompt clinici...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5561329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28835817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfx067 |
_version_ | 1783257825053507584 |
---|---|
author | Joglekar, Kiran Eason, James D. Molnar, Miklos Z. |
author_facet | Joglekar, Kiran Eason, James D. Molnar, Miklos Z. |
author_sort | Joglekar, Kiran |
collection | PubMed |
description | The number of patients listed active for kidney transplantation has continued to rise over the last 10 years, leading to significantly increased wait-list time for patients awaiting kidney transplantation in the USA. This increased demand has led to a supply–demand mismatch and should prompt clinicians to seek timely solutions to improve access to available organs. Hepatitis C virus positive [HCV(+)] kidneys continue to be discarded without clear evidence that they lead to poor outcomes in the current era of highly efficacious HCV treatment with direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs). Increased utilization of HCV(+) donor kidneys will decrease wait-list time and improve availability of donor organs. Emerging data suggests that HCV can be successfully treated with DAAs after kidney transplantation with 100% sustained virologic response rates and no significant changes from baseline kidney function. Utilization of HCV(+) donor kidneys should be considered more liberally in the era of highly effective HCV treatment. Further studies are warranted to assess the long-term effect of HCV(+) donor kidneys in transplant recipients in the new era of DAAs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5561329 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55613292017-08-23 Do we really need more evidence to use hepatitis C positive donor kidney more liberally? Joglekar, Kiran Eason, James D. Molnar, Miklos Z. Clin Kidney J Transplantation The number of patients listed active for kidney transplantation has continued to rise over the last 10 years, leading to significantly increased wait-list time for patients awaiting kidney transplantation in the USA. This increased demand has led to a supply–demand mismatch and should prompt clinicians to seek timely solutions to improve access to available organs. Hepatitis C virus positive [HCV(+)] kidneys continue to be discarded without clear evidence that they lead to poor outcomes in the current era of highly efficacious HCV treatment with direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs). Increased utilization of HCV(+) donor kidneys will decrease wait-list time and improve availability of donor organs. Emerging data suggests that HCV can be successfully treated with DAAs after kidney transplantation with 100% sustained virologic response rates and no significant changes from baseline kidney function. Utilization of HCV(+) donor kidneys should be considered more liberally in the era of highly effective HCV treatment. Further studies are warranted to assess the long-term effect of HCV(+) donor kidneys in transplant recipients in the new era of DAAs. Oxford University Press 2017-08 2017-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5561329/ /pubmed/28835817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfx067 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Transplantation Joglekar, Kiran Eason, James D. Molnar, Miklos Z. Do we really need more evidence to use hepatitis C positive donor kidney more liberally? |
title | Do we really need more evidence to use hepatitis C positive donor kidney more liberally? |
title_full | Do we really need more evidence to use hepatitis C positive donor kidney more liberally? |
title_fullStr | Do we really need more evidence to use hepatitis C positive donor kidney more liberally? |
title_full_unstemmed | Do we really need more evidence to use hepatitis C positive donor kidney more liberally? |
title_short | Do we really need more evidence to use hepatitis C positive donor kidney more liberally? |
title_sort | do we really need more evidence to use hepatitis c positive donor kidney more liberally? |
topic | Transplantation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5561329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28835817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfx067 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT joglekarkiran dowereallyneedmoreevidencetousehepatitiscpositivedonorkidneymoreliberally AT easonjamesd dowereallyneedmoreevidencetousehepatitiscpositivedonorkidneymoreliberally AT molnarmiklosz dowereallyneedmoreevidencetousehepatitiscpositivedonorkidneymoreliberally |