Cargando…

Do we really need more evidence to use hepatitis C positive donor kidney more liberally?

The number of patients listed active for kidney transplantation has continued to rise over the last 10 years, leading to significantly increased wait-list time for patients awaiting kidney transplantation in the USA. This increased demand has led to a supply–demand mismatch and should prompt clinici...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joglekar, Kiran, Eason, James D., Molnar, Miklos Z.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5561329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28835817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfx067
_version_ 1783257825053507584
author Joglekar, Kiran
Eason, James D.
Molnar, Miklos Z.
author_facet Joglekar, Kiran
Eason, James D.
Molnar, Miklos Z.
author_sort Joglekar, Kiran
collection PubMed
description The number of patients listed active for kidney transplantation has continued to rise over the last 10 years, leading to significantly increased wait-list time for patients awaiting kidney transplantation in the USA. This increased demand has led to a supply–demand mismatch and should prompt clinicians to seek timely solutions to improve access to available organs. Hepatitis C virus positive [HCV(+)] kidneys continue to be discarded without clear evidence that they lead to poor outcomes in the current era of highly efficacious HCV treatment with direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs). Increased utilization of HCV(+) donor kidneys will decrease wait-list time and improve availability of donor organs. Emerging data suggests that HCV can be successfully treated with DAAs after kidney transplantation with 100% sustained virologic response rates and no significant changes from baseline kidney function. Utilization of HCV(+) donor kidneys should be considered more liberally in the era of highly effective HCV treatment. Further studies are warranted to assess the long-term effect of HCV(+) donor kidneys in transplant recipients in the new era of DAAs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5561329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55613292017-08-23 Do we really need more evidence to use hepatitis C positive donor kidney more liberally? Joglekar, Kiran Eason, James D. Molnar, Miklos Z. Clin Kidney J Transplantation The number of patients listed active for kidney transplantation has continued to rise over the last 10 years, leading to significantly increased wait-list time for patients awaiting kidney transplantation in the USA. This increased demand has led to a supply–demand mismatch and should prompt clinicians to seek timely solutions to improve access to available organs. Hepatitis C virus positive [HCV(+)] kidneys continue to be discarded without clear evidence that they lead to poor outcomes in the current era of highly efficacious HCV treatment with direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs). Increased utilization of HCV(+) donor kidneys will decrease wait-list time and improve availability of donor organs. Emerging data suggests that HCV can be successfully treated with DAAs after kidney transplantation with 100% sustained virologic response rates and no significant changes from baseline kidney function. Utilization of HCV(+) donor kidneys should be considered more liberally in the era of highly effective HCV treatment. Further studies are warranted to assess the long-term effect of HCV(+) donor kidneys in transplant recipients in the new era of DAAs. Oxford University Press 2017-08 2017-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5561329/ /pubmed/28835817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfx067 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Transplantation
Joglekar, Kiran
Eason, James D.
Molnar, Miklos Z.
Do we really need more evidence to use hepatitis C positive donor kidney more liberally?
title Do we really need more evidence to use hepatitis C positive donor kidney more liberally?
title_full Do we really need more evidence to use hepatitis C positive donor kidney more liberally?
title_fullStr Do we really need more evidence to use hepatitis C positive donor kidney more liberally?
title_full_unstemmed Do we really need more evidence to use hepatitis C positive donor kidney more liberally?
title_short Do we really need more evidence to use hepatitis C positive donor kidney more liberally?
title_sort do we really need more evidence to use hepatitis c positive donor kidney more liberally?
topic Transplantation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5561329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28835817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfx067
work_keys_str_mv AT joglekarkiran dowereallyneedmoreevidencetousehepatitiscpositivedonorkidneymoreliberally
AT easonjamesd dowereallyneedmoreevidencetousehepatitiscpositivedonorkidneymoreliberally
AT molnarmiklosz dowereallyneedmoreevidencetousehepatitiscpositivedonorkidneymoreliberally