Cargando…

Anti-angiogenesis target therapy for advanced osteosarcoma

Osteosarcomas (OS), especially those with metastatic or unresectable disease, have limited treatment options. The greatest advancement in treatments occurred in the 1980s when multi-agent chemotherapy, including doxorubicin, cisplatin, high-dose methotrexate, and, in some regimens, ifosfamide, was d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xie, Lu, Ji, Tao, Guo, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5562076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28656259
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/or.2017.5735
_version_ 1783257915807760384
author Xie, Lu
Ji, Tao
Guo, Wei
author_facet Xie, Lu
Ji, Tao
Guo, Wei
author_sort Xie, Lu
collection PubMed
description Osteosarcomas (OS), especially those with metastatic or unresectable disease, have limited treatment options. The greatest advancement in treatments occurred in the 1980s when multi-agent chemotherapy, including doxorubicin, cisplatin, high-dose methotrexate, and, in some regimens, ifosfamide, was demonstrated to improve overall survival compared with surgery alone. However, standard chemotherapeutic options have been limited by poor response rates in patients with relapsed or advanced cases. It has been reported that VEGFR expression correlates with the outcome of patients with osteosarcoma and circulating VEGF level has been associated with the development of lung metastasis. At present, it seems to us that progress has not been made since Grignani reported a phase II cohort trial of sorafenib and sorafenib combined with everolimus for advanced osteosarcoma, which, in a sense, have become a milestone as a second-line therapy for osteosarcoma. Although the recognization of muramyltripepetide phosphatidyl-ethanolamine has made some progress based on its combination with standard chemotherapy, its effect on refractory cases is controversial. Personalized comprehensive molecular profiling of high-risk osteosarcoma up to now has not changed the therapeutic prospect of advanced osteosarcoma significantly. Thus, how far have we moved forward and what therapeutic strategy should we prefer for anti-angiogenesis therapy? This review provides an overview of the most updated anti-angiogenesis therapy in OS and discusses some clinical options in order to maintain or even improve progression-free survival.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5562076
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55620762017-11-02 Anti-angiogenesis target therapy for advanced osteosarcoma Xie, Lu Ji, Tao Guo, Wei Oncol Rep Review Osteosarcomas (OS), especially those with metastatic or unresectable disease, have limited treatment options. The greatest advancement in treatments occurred in the 1980s when multi-agent chemotherapy, including doxorubicin, cisplatin, high-dose methotrexate, and, in some regimens, ifosfamide, was demonstrated to improve overall survival compared with surgery alone. However, standard chemotherapeutic options have been limited by poor response rates in patients with relapsed or advanced cases. It has been reported that VEGFR expression correlates with the outcome of patients with osteosarcoma and circulating VEGF level has been associated with the development of lung metastasis. At present, it seems to us that progress has not been made since Grignani reported a phase II cohort trial of sorafenib and sorafenib combined with everolimus for advanced osteosarcoma, which, in a sense, have become a milestone as a second-line therapy for osteosarcoma. Although the recognization of muramyltripepetide phosphatidyl-ethanolamine has made some progress based on its combination with standard chemotherapy, its effect on refractory cases is controversial. Personalized comprehensive molecular profiling of high-risk osteosarcoma up to now has not changed the therapeutic prospect of advanced osteosarcoma significantly. Thus, how far have we moved forward and what therapeutic strategy should we prefer for anti-angiogenesis therapy? This review provides an overview of the most updated anti-angiogenesis therapy in OS and discusses some clinical options in order to maintain or even improve progression-free survival. D.A. Spandidos 2017-08 2017-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5562076/ /pubmed/28656259 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/or.2017.5735 Text en Copyright: © Xie et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Review
Xie, Lu
Ji, Tao
Guo, Wei
Anti-angiogenesis target therapy for advanced osteosarcoma
title Anti-angiogenesis target therapy for advanced osteosarcoma
title_full Anti-angiogenesis target therapy for advanced osteosarcoma
title_fullStr Anti-angiogenesis target therapy for advanced osteosarcoma
title_full_unstemmed Anti-angiogenesis target therapy for advanced osteosarcoma
title_short Anti-angiogenesis target therapy for advanced osteosarcoma
title_sort anti-angiogenesis target therapy for advanced osteosarcoma
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5562076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28656259
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/or.2017.5735
work_keys_str_mv AT xielu antiangiogenesistargettherapyforadvancedosteosarcoma
AT jitao antiangiogenesistargettherapyforadvancedosteosarcoma
AT guowei antiangiogenesistargettherapyforadvancedosteosarcoma