Cargando…

New Model for Estimating Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients With Cancer

PURPOSE: The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is essential for carboplatin chemotherapy dosing; however, the best method to estimate GFR in patients with cancer is unknown. We identify the most accurate and least biased method. METHODS: We obtained data on age, sex, height, weight, serum creatinine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Janowitz, Tobias, Williams, Edward H., Marshall, Andrea, Ainsworth, Nicola, Thomas, Peter B., Sammut, Stephen J., Shepherd, Scott, White, Jeff, Mark, Patrick B., Lynch, Andy G., Jodrell, Duncan I., Tavaré, Simon, Earl, Helena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society of Clinical Oncology 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5562175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28686534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.72.7578
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is essential for carboplatin chemotherapy dosing; however, the best method to estimate GFR in patients with cancer is unknown. We identify the most accurate and least biased method. METHODS: We obtained data on age, sex, height, weight, serum creatinine concentrations, and results for GFR from chromium-51 ((51)Cr) EDTA excretion measurements ((51)Cr-EDTA GFR) from white patients ≥ 18 years of age with histologically confirmed cancer diagnoses at the Cambridge University Hospital NHS Trust, United Kingdom. We developed a new multivariable linear model for GFR using statistical regression analysis. (51)Cr-EDTA GFR was compared with the estimated GFR (eGFR) from seven published models and our new model, using the statistics root-mean-squared-error (RMSE) and median residual and on an internal and external validation data set. We performed a comparison of carboplatin dosing accuracy on the basis of an absolute percentage error > 20%. RESULTS: Between August 2006 and January 2013, data from 2,471 patients were obtained. The new model improved the eGFR accuracy (RMSE, 15.00 mL/min; 95% CI, 14.12 to 16.00 mL/min) compared with all published models. Body surface area (BSA)–adjusted chronic kidney disease epidemiology (CKD-EPI) was the most accurate published model for eGFR (RMSE, 16.30 mL/min; 95% CI, 15.34 to 17.38 mL/min) for the internal validation set. Importantly, the new model reduced the fraction of patients with a carboplatin dose absolute percentage error > 20% to 14.17% in contrast to 18.62% for the BSA-adjusted CKD-EPI and 25.51% for the Cockcroft-Gault formula. The results were externally validated. CONCLUSION: In a large data set from patients with cancer, BSA-adjusted CKD-EPI is the most accurate published model to predict GFR. The new model improves this estimation and may present a new standard of care.