Cargando…

Group versus Traditional Prenatal Care in Low Risk Women Delivering at Term: a Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: Group prenatal care (GC) models are receiving increasing attention as a means of preventing preterm birth; yet, there is limited data on whether group care improves perinatal outcomes in in women who deliver at term. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate our institutional...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carter, Ebony B., Barbier, Kate, Sarabia, Rebecca, Macones, George A., Cahill, Alison G., Tuuli, Methodius G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5562521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28358385
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jp.2017.33
_version_ 1783257979880996864
author Carter, Ebony B.
Barbier, Kate
Sarabia, Rebecca
Macones, George A.
Cahill, Alison G.
Tuuli, Methodius G.
author_facet Carter, Ebony B.
Barbier, Kate
Sarabia, Rebecca
Macones, George A.
Cahill, Alison G.
Tuuli, Methodius G.
author_sort Carter, Ebony B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Group prenatal care (GC) models are receiving increasing attention as a means of preventing preterm birth; yet, there is limited data on whether group care improves perinatal outcomes in in women who deliver at term. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate our institutional experience with GC over the last decade and test the hypothesis that GC, compared to traditional individual care (TC), improves perinatal outcomes in women who deliver at term. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study of women delivering at term who participated in GC compared to TC. A group of 207 GC patients who delivered at term from 2004–2014 were matched in a 1:2 ratio to 414 patients with term singleton pregnancies who delivered at our institution during the same period by delivery year, maternal age, race, and insurance status. The primary outcome was low birthweight < 2500g. Secondary outcomes included early term birth (37.0–38 6/7 weeks), 5 minute APGAR score <7, special care nursery admission, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, neonatal demise, cesarean section, and number of prenatal visits. Outcomes were compared between the two groups using univariable statistics. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between the two matched groups. GC was associated with a significant reduction in low birthweight infants compared to TC (11.1% vs. 19.6%; RR 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37–0.87). Patients in GC were significantly less likely than controls to require cesarean delivery, have low 5 min APGAR scores and need higher level neonatal care (NICU: 1.5% vs. 6.5%; RR 0.22; 95% CI 0.07–0.72). There were no significant differences in rates of early term birth and neonatal demise. CONCLUSION: Low-risk women participating in GC and delivering at term had a lower risk of low birthweight and other adverse perinatal outcomes compared to women in TC. This suggests GC is a promising alternative to individual prenatal care to improve perinatal outcomes in addition to preterm birth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5562521
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55625212017-09-30 Group versus Traditional Prenatal Care in Low Risk Women Delivering at Term: a Retrospective Cohort Study Carter, Ebony B. Barbier, Kate Sarabia, Rebecca Macones, George A. Cahill, Alison G. Tuuli, Methodius G. J Perinatol Article BACKGROUND: Group prenatal care (GC) models are receiving increasing attention as a means of preventing preterm birth; yet, there is limited data on whether group care improves perinatal outcomes in in women who deliver at term. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate our institutional experience with GC over the last decade and test the hypothesis that GC, compared to traditional individual care (TC), improves perinatal outcomes in women who deliver at term. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study of women delivering at term who participated in GC compared to TC. A group of 207 GC patients who delivered at term from 2004–2014 were matched in a 1:2 ratio to 414 patients with term singleton pregnancies who delivered at our institution during the same period by delivery year, maternal age, race, and insurance status. The primary outcome was low birthweight < 2500g. Secondary outcomes included early term birth (37.0–38 6/7 weeks), 5 minute APGAR score <7, special care nursery admission, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, neonatal demise, cesarean section, and number of prenatal visits. Outcomes were compared between the two groups using univariable statistics. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between the two matched groups. GC was associated with a significant reduction in low birthweight infants compared to TC (11.1% vs. 19.6%; RR 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37–0.87). Patients in GC were significantly less likely than controls to require cesarean delivery, have low 5 min APGAR scores and need higher level neonatal care (NICU: 1.5% vs. 6.5%; RR 0.22; 95% CI 0.07–0.72). There were no significant differences in rates of early term birth and neonatal demise. CONCLUSION: Low-risk women participating in GC and delivering at term had a lower risk of low birthweight and other adverse perinatal outcomes compared to women in TC. This suggests GC is a promising alternative to individual prenatal care to improve perinatal outcomes in addition to preterm birth. 2017-03-30 2017-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5562521/ /pubmed/28358385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jp.2017.33 Text en Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Carter, Ebony B.
Barbier, Kate
Sarabia, Rebecca
Macones, George A.
Cahill, Alison G.
Tuuli, Methodius G.
Group versus Traditional Prenatal Care in Low Risk Women Delivering at Term: a Retrospective Cohort Study
title Group versus Traditional Prenatal Care in Low Risk Women Delivering at Term: a Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full Group versus Traditional Prenatal Care in Low Risk Women Delivering at Term: a Retrospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr Group versus Traditional Prenatal Care in Low Risk Women Delivering at Term: a Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Group versus Traditional Prenatal Care in Low Risk Women Delivering at Term: a Retrospective Cohort Study
title_short Group versus Traditional Prenatal Care in Low Risk Women Delivering at Term: a Retrospective Cohort Study
title_sort group versus traditional prenatal care in low risk women delivering at term: a retrospective cohort study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5562521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28358385
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jp.2017.33
work_keys_str_mv AT carterebonyb groupversustraditionalprenatalcareinlowriskwomendeliveringattermaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT barbierkate groupversustraditionalprenatalcareinlowriskwomendeliveringattermaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT sarabiarebecca groupversustraditionalprenatalcareinlowriskwomendeliveringattermaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT maconesgeorgea groupversustraditionalprenatalcareinlowriskwomendeliveringattermaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT cahillalisong groupversustraditionalprenatalcareinlowriskwomendeliveringattermaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT tuulimethodiusg groupversustraditionalprenatalcareinlowriskwomendeliveringattermaretrospectivecohortstudy