Cargando…

Psychiatric Consultation at Your Fingertips: Descriptive Analysis of Electronic Consultation From Primary Care to Psychiatry

BACKGROUND: Mental health problems are commonly encountered in primary care, with primary care providers (PCPs) experiencing challenges referring patients to specialty mental health care. Electronic consultation (eConsult) is one model that has been shown to improve timely access to subspecialty car...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lowenstein, Margaret, Bamgbose, Olusinmi, Gleason, Nathaniel, Feldman, Mitchell D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5562932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28778852
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7921
_version_ 1783258041716572160
author Lowenstein, Margaret
Bamgbose, Olusinmi
Gleason, Nathaniel
Feldman, Mitchell D
author_facet Lowenstein, Margaret
Bamgbose, Olusinmi
Gleason, Nathaniel
Feldman, Mitchell D
author_sort Lowenstein, Margaret
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mental health problems are commonly encountered in primary care, with primary care providers (PCPs) experiencing challenges referring patients to specialty mental health care. Electronic consultation (eConsult) is one model that has been shown to improve timely access to subspecialty care in a number of medical subspecialties. eConsults generally involve a PCP-initiated referral for specialty consultation for a clinical question that is outside their expertise but may not require an in-person evaluation. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to describe the implementation of eConsults for psychiatry in a large academic health system. METHODS: We performed a content analysis of the first 50 eConsults to psychiatry after program implementation. For each question and response, we coded consults as pertaining to diagnosis and/or management as well as categories of medication choice, drug side effects or interactions, and queries about referrals and navigating the health care system. We also performed a chart review to evaluate the timeliness of psychiatrist responses and PCP implementation of recommendations. RESULTS: Depression was the most common consult template selected by PCPs (20/50, 40%), followed by the generic template (12/50, 24%) and anxiety (8/50, 16%). Most questions (49/50, 98%) pertained primarily to management, particularly for medications. Psychiatrists commented on both diagnosis (28/50, 56%) and management (50/50, 100%), responded in an average of 1.4 days, and recommended in-person consultation for 26% (13/50) of patients. PCPs implemented psychiatrist recommendations 76% (38/50) of the time. CONCLUSIONS: For the majority of patients, psychiatrists provided strategies for ongoing management in primary care without an in-person evaluation, and PCPs implemented most psychiatrist recommendations. eConsults show promise as one means of supporting PCPs to deliver mental health care to patients with common psychiatric disorders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5562932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55629322017-08-29 Psychiatric Consultation at Your Fingertips: Descriptive Analysis of Electronic Consultation From Primary Care to Psychiatry Lowenstein, Margaret Bamgbose, Olusinmi Gleason, Nathaniel Feldman, Mitchell D J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Mental health problems are commonly encountered in primary care, with primary care providers (PCPs) experiencing challenges referring patients to specialty mental health care. Electronic consultation (eConsult) is one model that has been shown to improve timely access to subspecialty care in a number of medical subspecialties. eConsults generally involve a PCP-initiated referral for specialty consultation for a clinical question that is outside their expertise but may not require an in-person evaluation. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to describe the implementation of eConsults for psychiatry in a large academic health system. METHODS: We performed a content analysis of the first 50 eConsults to psychiatry after program implementation. For each question and response, we coded consults as pertaining to diagnosis and/or management as well as categories of medication choice, drug side effects or interactions, and queries about referrals and navigating the health care system. We also performed a chart review to evaluate the timeliness of psychiatrist responses and PCP implementation of recommendations. RESULTS: Depression was the most common consult template selected by PCPs (20/50, 40%), followed by the generic template (12/50, 24%) and anxiety (8/50, 16%). Most questions (49/50, 98%) pertained primarily to management, particularly for medications. Psychiatrists commented on both diagnosis (28/50, 56%) and management (50/50, 100%), responded in an average of 1.4 days, and recommended in-person consultation for 26% (13/50) of patients. PCPs implemented psychiatrist recommendations 76% (38/50) of the time. CONCLUSIONS: For the majority of patients, psychiatrists provided strategies for ongoing management in primary care without an in-person evaluation, and PCPs implemented most psychiatrist recommendations. eConsults show promise as one means of supporting PCPs to deliver mental health care to patients with common psychiatric disorders. JMIR Publications 2017-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5562932/ /pubmed/28778852 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7921 Text en ©Margaret Lowenstein, Olusinmi Bamgbose, Nathaniel Gleason, Mitchell D Feldman. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 04.08.2017. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Lowenstein, Margaret
Bamgbose, Olusinmi
Gleason, Nathaniel
Feldman, Mitchell D
Psychiatric Consultation at Your Fingertips: Descriptive Analysis of Electronic Consultation From Primary Care to Psychiatry
title Psychiatric Consultation at Your Fingertips: Descriptive Analysis of Electronic Consultation From Primary Care to Psychiatry
title_full Psychiatric Consultation at Your Fingertips: Descriptive Analysis of Electronic Consultation From Primary Care to Psychiatry
title_fullStr Psychiatric Consultation at Your Fingertips: Descriptive Analysis of Electronic Consultation From Primary Care to Psychiatry
title_full_unstemmed Psychiatric Consultation at Your Fingertips: Descriptive Analysis of Electronic Consultation From Primary Care to Psychiatry
title_short Psychiatric Consultation at Your Fingertips: Descriptive Analysis of Electronic Consultation From Primary Care to Psychiatry
title_sort psychiatric consultation at your fingertips: descriptive analysis of electronic consultation from primary care to psychiatry
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5562932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28778852
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7921
work_keys_str_mv AT lowensteinmargaret psychiatricconsultationatyourfingertipsdescriptiveanalysisofelectronicconsultationfromprimarycaretopsychiatry
AT bamgboseolusinmi psychiatricconsultationatyourfingertipsdescriptiveanalysisofelectronicconsultationfromprimarycaretopsychiatry
AT gleasonnathaniel psychiatricconsultationatyourfingertipsdescriptiveanalysisofelectronicconsultationfromprimarycaretopsychiatry
AT feldmanmitchelld psychiatricconsultationatyourfingertipsdescriptiveanalysisofelectronicconsultationfromprimarycaretopsychiatry