Cargando…

Survey of practitioners’ competency for diagnosis of acute diseases manifest on chest X-ray

BACKGROUND: Chest X-ray (CXR) is a common imaging modality that could impact immediate decision-making for acute chest pathologies. We sought to examine the non-radiologists proficiency of diagnosing acute pathologies manifest on CXR. METHODS: We selected 9 clinical vignettes, each associated with a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mehdipoor, Ghazaleh, Salmani, Fatemeh, Arjmand Shabestari, Abbas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5563017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28821227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-017-0222-8
_version_ 1783258057175728128
author Mehdipoor, Ghazaleh
Salmani, Fatemeh
Arjmand Shabestari, Abbas
author_facet Mehdipoor, Ghazaleh
Salmani, Fatemeh
Arjmand Shabestari, Abbas
author_sort Mehdipoor, Ghazaleh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chest X-ray (CXR) is a common imaging modality that could impact immediate decision-making for acute chest pathologies. We sought to examine the non-radiologists proficiency of diagnosing acute pathologies manifest on CXR. METHODS: We selected 9 clinical vignettes, each associated with a CXR, wherein only a single acute chest pathology was manifest. We also added a low-risk vignette associated with a normal CXR. We built an electronic survey with the CXR-embedded vignettes and also inquired about the participants’ confidence in the diagnosis, and prior exposure to the topics. We distributed the survey to senior medical students and general practitioners (GPs) in Tehran, Iran. We scored each correct answer per each vignette as 1 and each incorrect answer as 0; leading into a sum score from 0 to10 for the entire survey for each participant. RESULTS: Of the 136 candidates, 100 had legible survey results (67 medical students and 33 GPs). The overall score (mean [standard error]) was 3.57 [0.20], with no significant difference between the students and GPs (P = 0.15). The lowest rate of correct response occurred for acute respiratory distress syndrome (8%), foreign body (12%), and normal CXR (15%), while the best-answered vignettes were diaphragmatic herniation (77%) and pneumoperitoneum (67%). Self-reported confidence was associated with correct response for pneumoperitoneum, tension pneumothorax, and pulmonary edema (P < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic proficiency of practitioners for acute chest pathologies in our study was poor, including for distinction of a normal CXR. Such dramatic knowledge deficiencies for common or life-threatening chest pathologies should be prioritized in the educational and continuous education curricula. Secure electronic tools for transferring the CXRs to specialists in case of acute pathologies would be an interim pragmatic alternative. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12880-017-0222-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5563017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55630172017-08-21 Survey of practitioners’ competency for diagnosis of acute diseases manifest on chest X-ray Mehdipoor, Ghazaleh Salmani, Fatemeh Arjmand Shabestari, Abbas BMC Med Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: Chest X-ray (CXR) is a common imaging modality that could impact immediate decision-making for acute chest pathologies. We sought to examine the non-radiologists proficiency of diagnosing acute pathologies manifest on CXR. METHODS: We selected 9 clinical vignettes, each associated with a CXR, wherein only a single acute chest pathology was manifest. We also added a low-risk vignette associated with a normal CXR. We built an electronic survey with the CXR-embedded vignettes and also inquired about the participants’ confidence in the diagnosis, and prior exposure to the topics. We distributed the survey to senior medical students and general practitioners (GPs) in Tehran, Iran. We scored each correct answer per each vignette as 1 and each incorrect answer as 0; leading into a sum score from 0 to10 for the entire survey for each participant. RESULTS: Of the 136 candidates, 100 had legible survey results (67 medical students and 33 GPs). The overall score (mean [standard error]) was 3.57 [0.20], with no significant difference between the students and GPs (P = 0.15). The lowest rate of correct response occurred for acute respiratory distress syndrome (8%), foreign body (12%), and normal CXR (15%), while the best-answered vignettes were diaphragmatic herniation (77%) and pneumoperitoneum (67%). Self-reported confidence was associated with correct response for pneumoperitoneum, tension pneumothorax, and pulmonary edema (P < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic proficiency of practitioners for acute chest pathologies in our study was poor, including for distinction of a normal CXR. Such dramatic knowledge deficiencies for common or life-threatening chest pathologies should be prioritized in the educational and continuous education curricula. Secure electronic tools for transferring the CXRs to specialists in case of acute pathologies would be an interim pragmatic alternative. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12880-017-0222-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5563017/ /pubmed/28821227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-017-0222-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mehdipoor, Ghazaleh
Salmani, Fatemeh
Arjmand Shabestari, Abbas
Survey of practitioners’ competency for diagnosis of acute diseases manifest on chest X-ray
title Survey of practitioners’ competency for diagnosis of acute diseases manifest on chest X-ray
title_full Survey of practitioners’ competency for diagnosis of acute diseases manifest on chest X-ray
title_fullStr Survey of practitioners’ competency for diagnosis of acute diseases manifest on chest X-ray
title_full_unstemmed Survey of practitioners’ competency for diagnosis of acute diseases manifest on chest X-ray
title_short Survey of practitioners’ competency for diagnosis of acute diseases manifest on chest X-ray
title_sort survey of practitioners’ competency for diagnosis of acute diseases manifest on chest x-ray
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5563017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28821227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-017-0222-8
work_keys_str_mv AT mehdipoorghazaleh surveyofpractitionerscompetencyfordiagnosisofacutediseasesmanifestonchestxray
AT salmanifatemeh surveyofpractitionerscompetencyfordiagnosisofacutediseasesmanifestonchestxray
AT arjmandshabestariabbas surveyofpractitionerscompetencyfordiagnosisofacutediseasesmanifestonchestxray