Cargando…
Impact of early initiation versus national standard of care of antiretroviral therapy in Swaziland’s public sector health system: study protocol for a stepped-wedge randomized trial
BACKGROUND: There is robust clinical evidence to support offering early access to antiretroviral treatment (ART) to all HIV-positive individuals, irrespective of disease stage, to both improve patient health outcomes and reduce HIV incidence. However, as the global treatment guidelines shift to meet...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5563033/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28821264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2128-8 |
_version_ | 1783258061003030528 |
---|---|
author | Walsh, Fiona J. Bärnighausen, Till Delva, Wim Fleming, Yvette Khumalo, Gavin Lejeune, Charlotte L. Mazibuko, Sikhathele Mlambo, Charmaine Khudzie Reis, Ria Spiegelman, Donna Zwane, Mandisa Okello, Velephi |
author_facet | Walsh, Fiona J. Bärnighausen, Till Delva, Wim Fleming, Yvette Khumalo, Gavin Lejeune, Charlotte L. Mazibuko, Sikhathele Mlambo, Charmaine Khudzie Reis, Ria Spiegelman, Donna Zwane, Mandisa Okello, Velephi |
author_sort | Walsh, Fiona J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is robust clinical evidence to support offering early access to antiretroviral treatment (ART) to all HIV-positive individuals, irrespective of disease stage, to both improve patient health outcomes and reduce HIV incidence. However, as the global treatment guidelines shift to meet this evidence, it is still largely unknown if early access to ART for all (also referred to as “treatment as prevention” or “universal test and treat”) is a feasible intervention in the resource-limited countries where this approach could have the biggest impact on the course of the HIV epidemics. The MaxART Early Access to ART for All (EAAA) implementation study was designed to determine the feasibility, acceptability, clinical outcomes, affordability, and scalability of offering early antiretroviral treatment to all HIV-positive individuals in Swaziland’s public sector health system. METHODS: This is a three-year stepped-wedge randomized design with open enrollment for all adults aged 18 years and older across 14 government-managed health facilities in Swaziland’s Hhohho Region. Primary endpoints are retention and viral suppression. Secondary endpoints include ART initiation, adherence, drug resistance, tuberculosis, HIV disease progression, patient satisfaction, and cost per patient per year. Sites are grouped to transition two at a time from the control (standard of care) to intervention (EAAA) stage at each four-month step. This design will result in approximately one half of the total observation time to accrue in the intervention arm and the other half in the control arm. Our estimated enrolment number, which is supported by conservative power calculations, is 4501 patients over the course of the 36-month study period. A multidisciplinary, mixed-methods approach will be adopted to supplement the randomized controlled trial and meet the study aims. Additional study components include implementation science, social science, economic evaluation, and predictive HIV incidence modeling. DISCUSSION: A stepped-wedge randomized design is a causally strong and robust approach to determine if providing antiretroviral treatment for all HIV-positive individuals is a feasible intervention in a resource-limited, public sector health system. We expect our study results to contribute to health policy decisions related to the HIV response in Swaziland and other countries in sub-Saharan Africa. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02909218. Registered on 10 July 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2128-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5563033 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55630332017-08-21 Impact of early initiation versus national standard of care of antiretroviral therapy in Swaziland’s public sector health system: study protocol for a stepped-wedge randomized trial Walsh, Fiona J. Bärnighausen, Till Delva, Wim Fleming, Yvette Khumalo, Gavin Lejeune, Charlotte L. Mazibuko, Sikhathele Mlambo, Charmaine Khudzie Reis, Ria Spiegelman, Donna Zwane, Mandisa Okello, Velephi Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: There is robust clinical evidence to support offering early access to antiretroviral treatment (ART) to all HIV-positive individuals, irrespective of disease stage, to both improve patient health outcomes and reduce HIV incidence. However, as the global treatment guidelines shift to meet this evidence, it is still largely unknown if early access to ART for all (also referred to as “treatment as prevention” or “universal test and treat”) is a feasible intervention in the resource-limited countries where this approach could have the biggest impact on the course of the HIV epidemics. The MaxART Early Access to ART for All (EAAA) implementation study was designed to determine the feasibility, acceptability, clinical outcomes, affordability, and scalability of offering early antiretroviral treatment to all HIV-positive individuals in Swaziland’s public sector health system. METHODS: This is a three-year stepped-wedge randomized design with open enrollment for all adults aged 18 years and older across 14 government-managed health facilities in Swaziland’s Hhohho Region. Primary endpoints are retention and viral suppression. Secondary endpoints include ART initiation, adherence, drug resistance, tuberculosis, HIV disease progression, patient satisfaction, and cost per patient per year. Sites are grouped to transition two at a time from the control (standard of care) to intervention (EAAA) stage at each four-month step. This design will result in approximately one half of the total observation time to accrue in the intervention arm and the other half in the control arm. Our estimated enrolment number, which is supported by conservative power calculations, is 4501 patients over the course of the 36-month study period. A multidisciplinary, mixed-methods approach will be adopted to supplement the randomized controlled trial and meet the study aims. Additional study components include implementation science, social science, economic evaluation, and predictive HIV incidence modeling. DISCUSSION: A stepped-wedge randomized design is a causally strong and robust approach to determine if providing antiretroviral treatment for all HIV-positive individuals is a feasible intervention in a resource-limited, public sector health system. We expect our study results to contribute to health policy decisions related to the HIV response in Swaziland and other countries in sub-Saharan Africa. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02909218. Registered on 10 July 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2128-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5563033/ /pubmed/28821264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2128-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Walsh, Fiona J. Bärnighausen, Till Delva, Wim Fleming, Yvette Khumalo, Gavin Lejeune, Charlotte L. Mazibuko, Sikhathele Mlambo, Charmaine Khudzie Reis, Ria Spiegelman, Donna Zwane, Mandisa Okello, Velephi Impact of early initiation versus national standard of care of antiretroviral therapy in Swaziland’s public sector health system: study protocol for a stepped-wedge randomized trial |
title | Impact of early initiation versus national standard of care of antiretroviral therapy in Swaziland’s public sector health system: study protocol for a stepped-wedge randomized trial |
title_full | Impact of early initiation versus national standard of care of antiretroviral therapy in Swaziland’s public sector health system: study protocol for a stepped-wedge randomized trial |
title_fullStr | Impact of early initiation versus national standard of care of antiretroviral therapy in Swaziland’s public sector health system: study protocol for a stepped-wedge randomized trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of early initiation versus national standard of care of antiretroviral therapy in Swaziland’s public sector health system: study protocol for a stepped-wedge randomized trial |
title_short | Impact of early initiation versus national standard of care of antiretroviral therapy in Swaziland’s public sector health system: study protocol for a stepped-wedge randomized trial |
title_sort | impact of early initiation versus national standard of care of antiretroviral therapy in swaziland’s public sector health system: study protocol for a stepped-wedge randomized trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5563033/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28821264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2128-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT walshfionaj impactofearlyinitiationversusnationalstandardofcareofantiretroviraltherapyinswazilandspublicsectorhealthsystemstudyprotocolforasteppedwedgerandomizedtrial AT barnighausentill impactofearlyinitiationversusnationalstandardofcareofantiretroviraltherapyinswazilandspublicsectorhealthsystemstudyprotocolforasteppedwedgerandomizedtrial AT delvawim impactofearlyinitiationversusnationalstandardofcareofantiretroviraltherapyinswazilandspublicsectorhealthsystemstudyprotocolforasteppedwedgerandomizedtrial AT flemingyvette impactofearlyinitiationversusnationalstandardofcareofantiretroviraltherapyinswazilandspublicsectorhealthsystemstudyprotocolforasteppedwedgerandomizedtrial AT khumalogavin impactofearlyinitiationversusnationalstandardofcareofantiretroviraltherapyinswazilandspublicsectorhealthsystemstudyprotocolforasteppedwedgerandomizedtrial AT lejeunecharlottel impactofearlyinitiationversusnationalstandardofcareofantiretroviraltherapyinswazilandspublicsectorhealthsystemstudyprotocolforasteppedwedgerandomizedtrial AT mazibukosikhathele impactofearlyinitiationversusnationalstandardofcareofantiretroviraltherapyinswazilandspublicsectorhealthsystemstudyprotocolforasteppedwedgerandomizedtrial AT mlambocharmainekhudzie impactofearlyinitiationversusnationalstandardofcareofantiretroviraltherapyinswazilandspublicsectorhealthsystemstudyprotocolforasteppedwedgerandomizedtrial AT reisria impactofearlyinitiationversusnationalstandardofcareofantiretroviraltherapyinswazilandspublicsectorhealthsystemstudyprotocolforasteppedwedgerandomizedtrial AT spiegelmandonna impactofearlyinitiationversusnationalstandardofcareofantiretroviraltherapyinswazilandspublicsectorhealthsystemstudyprotocolforasteppedwedgerandomizedtrial AT zwanemandisa impactofearlyinitiationversusnationalstandardofcareofantiretroviraltherapyinswazilandspublicsectorhealthsystemstudyprotocolforasteppedwedgerandomizedtrial AT okellovelephi impactofearlyinitiationversusnationalstandardofcareofantiretroviraltherapyinswazilandspublicsectorhealthsystemstudyprotocolforasteppedwedgerandomizedtrial |