Cargando…

Prognostic Factors for Survival in Patients with Gastric Cancer using a Random Survival Forest

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer and the third top cause of cancer related death with about 1 million new cases and 700,000 deaths in 2012. The aim of this investigation was to identify important factors for outcome using a random survival forest (RSF) approach. MATERIALS A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adham, Davoud, Abbasgholizadeh, Nategh, Abazari, Malek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5563089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28240020
http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.1.129
_version_ 1783258072755470336
author Adham, Davoud
Abbasgholizadeh, Nategh
Abazari, Malek
author_facet Adham, Davoud
Abbasgholizadeh, Nategh
Abazari, Malek
author_sort Adham, Davoud
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer and the third top cause of cancer related death with about 1 million new cases and 700,000 deaths in 2012. The aim of this investigation was to identify important factors for outcome using a random survival forest (RSF) approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected from 128 gastric cancer patients through a historical cohort study in Hamedan-Iran from 2007 to 2013. The event under consideration was death due to gastric cancer. The random survival forest model in R software was applied to determine the key factors affecting survival. Four split criteria were used to determine importance of the variables in the model including log-rank, conversation?? of events, log-rank score, and randomization. Efficiency of the model was confirmed in terms of Harrell’s concordance index. RESULTS: The mean age of diagnosis was 63 ±12.57 and mean and median survival times were 15.2 (95%CI: 13.3, 17.0) and 12.3 (95%CI: 11.0, 13.4) months, respectively. The one-year, two-year, and three-year rates for survival were 51%, 13%, and 5%, respectively. Each RSF approach showed a slightly different ranking order. Very important covariates in nearly all the 4 RSF approaches were metastatic status, age at diagnosis and tumor size. The performance of each RSF approach was in the range of 0.29-0.32 and the best error rate was obtained by the log-rank splitting rule; second, third, and fourth ranks were log-rank score, conservation of events, and the random splitting rule, respectively. CONCLUSION: Low survival rate of gastric cancer patients is an indication of absence of a screening program for early diagnosis of the disease. Timely diagnosis in early phases increases survival and decreases mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5563089
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55630892017-08-28 Prognostic Factors for Survival in Patients with Gastric Cancer using a Random Survival Forest Adham, Davoud Abbasgholizadeh, Nategh Abazari, Malek Asian Pac J Cancer Prev Research Article BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer and the third top cause of cancer related death with about 1 million new cases and 700,000 deaths in 2012. The aim of this investigation was to identify important factors for outcome using a random survival forest (RSF) approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected from 128 gastric cancer patients through a historical cohort study in Hamedan-Iran from 2007 to 2013. The event under consideration was death due to gastric cancer. The random survival forest model in R software was applied to determine the key factors affecting survival. Four split criteria were used to determine importance of the variables in the model including log-rank, conversation?? of events, log-rank score, and randomization. Efficiency of the model was confirmed in terms of Harrell’s concordance index. RESULTS: The mean age of diagnosis was 63 ±12.57 and mean and median survival times were 15.2 (95%CI: 13.3, 17.0) and 12.3 (95%CI: 11.0, 13.4) months, respectively. The one-year, two-year, and three-year rates for survival were 51%, 13%, and 5%, respectively. Each RSF approach showed a slightly different ranking order. Very important covariates in nearly all the 4 RSF approaches were metastatic status, age at diagnosis and tumor size. The performance of each RSF approach was in the range of 0.29-0.32 and the best error rate was obtained by the log-rank splitting rule; second, third, and fourth ranks were log-rank score, conservation of events, and the random splitting rule, respectively. CONCLUSION: Low survival rate of gastric cancer patients is an indication of absence of a screening program for early diagnosis of the disease. Timely diagnosis in early phases increases survival and decreases mortality. West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5563089/ /pubmed/28240020 http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.1.129 Text en Copyright: © Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-SA/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Research Article
Adham, Davoud
Abbasgholizadeh, Nategh
Abazari, Malek
Prognostic Factors for Survival in Patients with Gastric Cancer using a Random Survival Forest
title Prognostic Factors for Survival in Patients with Gastric Cancer using a Random Survival Forest
title_full Prognostic Factors for Survival in Patients with Gastric Cancer using a Random Survival Forest
title_fullStr Prognostic Factors for Survival in Patients with Gastric Cancer using a Random Survival Forest
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Factors for Survival in Patients with Gastric Cancer using a Random Survival Forest
title_short Prognostic Factors for Survival in Patients with Gastric Cancer using a Random Survival Forest
title_sort prognostic factors for survival in patients with gastric cancer using a random survival forest
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5563089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28240020
http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.1.129
work_keys_str_mv AT adhamdavoud prognosticfactorsforsurvivalinpatientswithgastriccancerusingarandomsurvivalforest
AT abbasgholizadehnategh prognosticfactorsforsurvivalinpatientswithgastriccancerusingarandomsurvivalforest
AT abazarimalek prognosticfactorsforsurvivalinpatientswithgastriccancerusingarandomsurvivalforest