Cargando…

Microbiome succession during ammonification in eelgrass bed sediments

BACKGROUND: Eelgrass (Zostera marina) is a marine angiosperm and foundation species that plays an important ecological role in primary production, food web support, and elemental cycling in coastal ecosystems. As with other plants, the microbial communities living in, on, and near eelgrass are thoug...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ettinger, Cassandra L., Williams, Susan L., Abbott, Jessica M., Stachowicz, John J., Eisen, Jonathan A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5563154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28828269
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3674
_version_ 1783258083132178432
author Ettinger, Cassandra L.
Williams, Susan L.
Abbott, Jessica M.
Stachowicz, John J.
Eisen, Jonathan A.
author_facet Ettinger, Cassandra L.
Williams, Susan L.
Abbott, Jessica M.
Stachowicz, John J.
Eisen, Jonathan A.
author_sort Ettinger, Cassandra L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Eelgrass (Zostera marina) is a marine angiosperm and foundation species that plays an important ecological role in primary production, food web support, and elemental cycling in coastal ecosystems. As with other plants, the microbial communities living in, on, and near eelgrass are thought to be intimately connected to the ecology and biology of eelgrass. Here we characterized the microbial communities in eelgrass sediments throughout an experiment to quantify the rate of ammonification, the first step in early remineralization of organic matter, also known as diagenesis, from plots at a field site in Bodega Bay, CA. METHODS: Sediment was collected from 72 plots from a 15 month long field experiment in which eelgrass genotypic richness and relatedness were manipulated. In the laboratory, we placed sediment samples (n = 4 per plot) under a N(2) atmosphere, incubated them at in situ temperatures (15 °C) and sampled them initially and after 4, 7, 13, and 19 days to determine the ammonification rate. Comparative microbiome analysis using high throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA genes was performed on sediment samples taken initially and at seven, 13 and 19 days to characterize changes in the relative abundances of microbial taxa throughout ammonification. RESULTS: Within-sample diversity of the sediment microbial communities across all plots decreased after the initial timepoint using both richness based (observed number of OTUs, Chao1) and richness and evenness based diversity metrics (Shannon, Inverse Simpson). Additionally, microbial community composition changed across the different timepoints. Many of the observed changes in relative abundance of taxonomic groups between timepoints appeared driven by sulfur cycling with observed decreases in predicted sulfur reducers (Desulfobacterales) and corresponding increases in predicted sulfide oxidizers (Thiotrichales). None of these changes in composition or richness were associated with variation in ammonification rates. DISCUSSION: Our results showed that the microbiome of sediment from different plots followed similar successional patterns, which we infer to be due to changes related to sulfur metabolism. These large changes likely overwhelmed any potential changes in sediment microbiome related to ammonification rate. We found no relationship between eelgrass presence or genetic composition and the microbiome. This was likely due to our sampling of bulk sediments to measure ammonification rates rather than sampling microbes in sediment directly in contact with the plants and suggests that eelgrass influence on the sediment microbiome may be limited in spatial extent. More in-depth functional studies associated with eelgrass microbiome will be required in order to fully understand the implications of these microbial communities in broader host-plant and ecosystem functions (e.g., elemental cycling and eelgrass-microbe interactions).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5563154
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55631542017-08-21 Microbiome succession during ammonification in eelgrass bed sediments Ettinger, Cassandra L. Williams, Susan L. Abbott, Jessica M. Stachowicz, John J. Eisen, Jonathan A. PeerJ Marine Biology BACKGROUND: Eelgrass (Zostera marina) is a marine angiosperm and foundation species that plays an important ecological role in primary production, food web support, and elemental cycling in coastal ecosystems. As with other plants, the microbial communities living in, on, and near eelgrass are thought to be intimately connected to the ecology and biology of eelgrass. Here we characterized the microbial communities in eelgrass sediments throughout an experiment to quantify the rate of ammonification, the first step in early remineralization of organic matter, also known as diagenesis, from plots at a field site in Bodega Bay, CA. METHODS: Sediment was collected from 72 plots from a 15 month long field experiment in which eelgrass genotypic richness and relatedness were manipulated. In the laboratory, we placed sediment samples (n = 4 per plot) under a N(2) atmosphere, incubated them at in situ temperatures (15 °C) and sampled them initially and after 4, 7, 13, and 19 days to determine the ammonification rate. Comparative microbiome analysis using high throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA genes was performed on sediment samples taken initially and at seven, 13 and 19 days to characterize changes in the relative abundances of microbial taxa throughout ammonification. RESULTS: Within-sample diversity of the sediment microbial communities across all plots decreased after the initial timepoint using both richness based (observed number of OTUs, Chao1) and richness and evenness based diversity metrics (Shannon, Inverse Simpson). Additionally, microbial community composition changed across the different timepoints. Many of the observed changes in relative abundance of taxonomic groups between timepoints appeared driven by sulfur cycling with observed decreases in predicted sulfur reducers (Desulfobacterales) and corresponding increases in predicted sulfide oxidizers (Thiotrichales). None of these changes in composition or richness were associated with variation in ammonification rates. DISCUSSION: Our results showed that the microbiome of sediment from different plots followed similar successional patterns, which we infer to be due to changes related to sulfur metabolism. These large changes likely overwhelmed any potential changes in sediment microbiome related to ammonification rate. We found no relationship between eelgrass presence or genetic composition and the microbiome. This was likely due to our sampling of bulk sediments to measure ammonification rates rather than sampling microbes in sediment directly in contact with the plants and suggests that eelgrass influence on the sediment microbiome may be limited in spatial extent. More in-depth functional studies associated with eelgrass microbiome will be required in order to fully understand the implications of these microbial communities in broader host-plant and ecosystem functions (e.g., elemental cycling and eelgrass-microbe interactions). PeerJ Inc. 2017-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5563154/ /pubmed/28828269 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3674 Text en ©2017 Ettinger et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Marine Biology
Ettinger, Cassandra L.
Williams, Susan L.
Abbott, Jessica M.
Stachowicz, John J.
Eisen, Jonathan A.
Microbiome succession during ammonification in eelgrass bed sediments
title Microbiome succession during ammonification in eelgrass bed sediments
title_full Microbiome succession during ammonification in eelgrass bed sediments
title_fullStr Microbiome succession during ammonification in eelgrass bed sediments
title_full_unstemmed Microbiome succession during ammonification in eelgrass bed sediments
title_short Microbiome succession during ammonification in eelgrass bed sediments
title_sort microbiome succession during ammonification in eelgrass bed sediments
topic Marine Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5563154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28828269
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3674
work_keys_str_mv AT ettingercassandral microbiomesuccessionduringammonificationineelgrassbedsediments
AT williamssusanl microbiomesuccessionduringammonificationineelgrassbedsediments
AT abbottjessicam microbiomesuccessionduringammonificationineelgrassbedsediments
AT stachowiczjohnj microbiomesuccessionduringammonificationineelgrassbedsediments
AT eisenjonathana microbiomesuccessionduringammonificationineelgrassbedsediments