Cargando…

Laparoscopic uncinate process first pancreatoduodenectomy—feasibility study of a modified ‘artery first’ approach to pancreatic head cancer

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to discuss the feasibility of laparoscopic ‘uncinate first’ pancreatoduodenectomy. METHODS: The analysis included prospectively collected data from 12 consecutive patients undergoing elective pure laparoscopic ‘uncinate process first’ pancreatoduodenectomy (Group 1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pędziwiatr, Michał, Pisarska, Magdalena, Małczak, Piotr, Major, Piotr, Wierdak, Mateusz, Radkowiak, Dorota, Kulawik, Jan, Dembiński, Marcin, Budzyński, Andrzej
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5563330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28699023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-017-1597-2
_version_ 1783258113816657920
author Pędziwiatr, Michał
Pisarska, Magdalena
Małczak, Piotr
Major, Piotr
Wierdak, Mateusz
Radkowiak, Dorota
Kulawik, Jan
Dembiński, Marcin
Budzyński, Andrzej
author_facet Pędziwiatr, Michał
Pisarska, Magdalena
Małczak, Piotr
Major, Piotr
Wierdak, Mateusz
Radkowiak, Dorota
Kulawik, Jan
Dembiński, Marcin
Budzyński, Andrzej
author_sort Pędziwiatr, Michał
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to discuss the feasibility of laparoscopic ‘uncinate first’ pancreatoduodenectomy. METHODS: The analysis included prospectively collected data from 12 consecutive patients undergoing elective pure laparoscopic ‘uncinate process first’ pancreatoduodenectomy (Group 1). They were compared with patients previously operated on with a classical laparoscopic approach (Group 2). The primary outcome was the quality of the resected specimen (lymph node (LN) yield, R0 rate, involved resection margins). Secondary outcomes were perioperative parameters. RESULTS: The LN yield in Group 1 was 19.3 and in Group 2 it was 13.9 (p = 0.03). R0 resection rates did not vary (66.7 vs. 63.2%, p = 0.84). Although the involvement of the superior mesenteric artery margin and uncinate process margin seemed lower in Group 1, the difference was not significant. Total operative time (467 vs. 425 min, p = 0.13) and resection time (221 vs. 232 min, p = 0.34) were similar in both groups. The estimated blood loss in Group 1 was 408 ml, whereas in Group 2 it was 392 ml (p = 0.33). Complication rates were 66.7% in Group 1 and 63.2% in Group 2 (p = 0.84). Median length of stay was 9 days in both groups (p = 0.36). Postoperative complication rates did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic uncinate first approach is a feasible method for pancreatic head neoplasms. Achieved quality of the specimen is comparable with the traditional laparoscopic approach, whereas intra- and postoperative course is not inferior. However, further studies on larger cohorts are required to fully establish whether the novel approach has potential advantages over classical access in pancreatic head cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5563330
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55633302017-09-01 Laparoscopic uncinate process first pancreatoduodenectomy—feasibility study of a modified ‘artery first’ approach to pancreatic head cancer Pędziwiatr, Michał Pisarska, Magdalena Małczak, Piotr Major, Piotr Wierdak, Mateusz Radkowiak, Dorota Kulawik, Jan Dembiński, Marcin Budzyński, Andrzej Langenbecks Arch Surg Original Article PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to discuss the feasibility of laparoscopic ‘uncinate first’ pancreatoduodenectomy. METHODS: The analysis included prospectively collected data from 12 consecutive patients undergoing elective pure laparoscopic ‘uncinate process first’ pancreatoduodenectomy (Group 1). They were compared with patients previously operated on with a classical laparoscopic approach (Group 2). The primary outcome was the quality of the resected specimen (lymph node (LN) yield, R0 rate, involved resection margins). Secondary outcomes were perioperative parameters. RESULTS: The LN yield in Group 1 was 19.3 and in Group 2 it was 13.9 (p = 0.03). R0 resection rates did not vary (66.7 vs. 63.2%, p = 0.84). Although the involvement of the superior mesenteric artery margin and uncinate process margin seemed lower in Group 1, the difference was not significant. Total operative time (467 vs. 425 min, p = 0.13) and resection time (221 vs. 232 min, p = 0.34) were similar in both groups. The estimated blood loss in Group 1 was 408 ml, whereas in Group 2 it was 392 ml (p = 0.33). Complication rates were 66.7% in Group 1 and 63.2% in Group 2 (p = 0.84). Median length of stay was 9 days in both groups (p = 0.36). Postoperative complication rates did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic uncinate first approach is a feasible method for pancreatic head neoplasms. Achieved quality of the specimen is comparable with the traditional laparoscopic approach, whereas intra- and postoperative course is not inferior. However, further studies on larger cohorts are required to fully establish whether the novel approach has potential advantages over classical access in pancreatic head cancer. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-07-11 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5563330/ /pubmed/28699023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-017-1597-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Pędziwiatr, Michał
Pisarska, Magdalena
Małczak, Piotr
Major, Piotr
Wierdak, Mateusz
Radkowiak, Dorota
Kulawik, Jan
Dembiński, Marcin
Budzyński, Andrzej
Laparoscopic uncinate process first pancreatoduodenectomy—feasibility study of a modified ‘artery first’ approach to pancreatic head cancer
title Laparoscopic uncinate process first pancreatoduodenectomy—feasibility study of a modified ‘artery first’ approach to pancreatic head cancer
title_full Laparoscopic uncinate process first pancreatoduodenectomy—feasibility study of a modified ‘artery first’ approach to pancreatic head cancer
title_fullStr Laparoscopic uncinate process first pancreatoduodenectomy—feasibility study of a modified ‘artery first’ approach to pancreatic head cancer
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic uncinate process first pancreatoduodenectomy—feasibility study of a modified ‘artery first’ approach to pancreatic head cancer
title_short Laparoscopic uncinate process first pancreatoduodenectomy—feasibility study of a modified ‘artery first’ approach to pancreatic head cancer
title_sort laparoscopic uncinate process first pancreatoduodenectomy—feasibility study of a modified ‘artery first’ approach to pancreatic head cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5563330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28699023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-017-1597-2
work_keys_str_mv AT pedziwiatrmichał laparoscopicuncinateprocessfirstpancreatoduodenectomyfeasibilitystudyofamodifiedarteryfirstapproachtopancreaticheadcancer
AT pisarskamagdalena laparoscopicuncinateprocessfirstpancreatoduodenectomyfeasibilitystudyofamodifiedarteryfirstapproachtopancreaticheadcancer
AT małczakpiotr laparoscopicuncinateprocessfirstpancreatoduodenectomyfeasibilitystudyofamodifiedarteryfirstapproachtopancreaticheadcancer
AT majorpiotr laparoscopicuncinateprocessfirstpancreatoduodenectomyfeasibilitystudyofamodifiedarteryfirstapproachtopancreaticheadcancer
AT wierdakmateusz laparoscopicuncinateprocessfirstpancreatoduodenectomyfeasibilitystudyofamodifiedarteryfirstapproachtopancreaticheadcancer
AT radkowiakdorota laparoscopicuncinateprocessfirstpancreatoduodenectomyfeasibilitystudyofamodifiedarteryfirstapproachtopancreaticheadcancer
AT kulawikjan laparoscopicuncinateprocessfirstpancreatoduodenectomyfeasibilitystudyofamodifiedarteryfirstapproachtopancreaticheadcancer
AT dembinskimarcin laparoscopicuncinateprocessfirstpancreatoduodenectomyfeasibilitystudyofamodifiedarteryfirstapproachtopancreaticheadcancer
AT budzynskiandrzej laparoscopicuncinateprocessfirstpancreatoduodenectomyfeasibilitystudyofamodifiedarteryfirstapproachtopancreaticheadcancer