Cargando…

Comparative study of analgesia with bupivacaine 0.25% versus 0.5% for third molar removal under general anesthesia

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and duration of action of two concentrations of bupivacaine with adrenaline for postoperative pain in patients undergoing surgical removal of four third molars under general anesthesia. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing surgical rem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dhanrajani, Parmanand, Chung, Patrick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5564080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28879304
http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2016.16.2.117
_version_ 1783258200332566528
author Dhanrajani, Parmanand
Chung, Patrick
author_facet Dhanrajani, Parmanand
Chung, Patrick
author_sort Dhanrajani, Parmanand
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and duration of action of two concentrations of bupivacaine with adrenaline for postoperative pain in patients undergoing surgical removal of four third molars under general anesthesia. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing surgical removal of four wisdom teeth received bupivacaine 0.5% (n = 30) or 0.25% (n = 30). The severity of pain in the immediate recovery period and at 2 and 24 h after surgery was recorded using the visual analogue scale. Differences were assessed by box and whisper plot and the Student's t-test. RESULTS: The analgesic effects of the 0.25% and 0.5% doses were significantly different (P = 0.022) at 30 min after surgery but not after 2 and 24 h. The difference of mean of 0.25% and 0.5% was much higher after 0.5 h but less after 2 and 24 h. CONCLUSIONS: Bupivacaine 0.5% was statistically better for pain control during the immediate postoperative period, but there was no significant difference in pain control between the two dose strengths at 2 and 24 h after surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5564080
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55640802017-09-06 Comparative study of analgesia with bupivacaine 0.25% versus 0.5% for third molar removal under general anesthesia Dhanrajani, Parmanand Chung, Patrick J Dent Anesth Pain Med Original Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and duration of action of two concentrations of bupivacaine with adrenaline for postoperative pain in patients undergoing surgical removal of four third molars under general anesthesia. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing surgical removal of four wisdom teeth received bupivacaine 0.5% (n = 30) or 0.25% (n = 30). The severity of pain in the immediate recovery period and at 2 and 24 h after surgery was recorded using the visual analogue scale. Differences were assessed by box and whisper plot and the Student's t-test. RESULTS: The analgesic effects of the 0.25% and 0.5% doses were significantly different (P = 0.022) at 30 min after surgery but not after 2 and 24 h. The difference of mean of 0.25% and 0.5% was much higher after 0.5 h but less after 2 and 24 h. CONCLUSIONS: Bupivacaine 0.5% was statistically better for pain control during the immediate postoperative period, but there was no significant difference in pain control between the two dose strengths at 2 and 24 h after surgery. The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology 2016-06 2016-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5564080/ /pubmed/28879304 http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2016.16.2.117 Text en Copyright © 2016 Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Dhanrajani, Parmanand
Chung, Patrick
Comparative study of analgesia with bupivacaine 0.25% versus 0.5% for third molar removal under general anesthesia
title Comparative study of analgesia with bupivacaine 0.25% versus 0.5% for third molar removal under general anesthesia
title_full Comparative study of analgesia with bupivacaine 0.25% versus 0.5% for third molar removal under general anesthesia
title_fullStr Comparative study of analgesia with bupivacaine 0.25% versus 0.5% for third molar removal under general anesthesia
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of analgesia with bupivacaine 0.25% versus 0.5% for third molar removal under general anesthesia
title_short Comparative study of analgesia with bupivacaine 0.25% versus 0.5% for third molar removal under general anesthesia
title_sort comparative study of analgesia with bupivacaine 0.25% versus 0.5% for third molar removal under general anesthesia
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5564080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28879304
http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2016.16.2.117
work_keys_str_mv AT dhanrajaniparmanand comparativestudyofanalgesiawithbupivacaine025versus05forthirdmolarremovalundergeneralanesthesia
AT chungpatrick comparativestudyofanalgesiawithbupivacaine025versus05forthirdmolarremovalundergeneralanesthesia