Cargando…
Comparative study of analgesia with bupivacaine 0.25% versus 0.5% for third molar removal under general anesthesia
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and duration of action of two concentrations of bupivacaine with adrenaline for postoperative pain in patients undergoing surgical removal of four third molars under general anesthesia. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing surgical rem...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5564080/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28879304 http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2016.16.2.117 |
_version_ | 1783258200332566528 |
---|---|
author | Dhanrajani, Parmanand Chung, Patrick |
author_facet | Dhanrajani, Parmanand Chung, Patrick |
author_sort | Dhanrajani, Parmanand |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and duration of action of two concentrations of bupivacaine with adrenaline for postoperative pain in patients undergoing surgical removal of four third molars under general anesthesia. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing surgical removal of four wisdom teeth received bupivacaine 0.5% (n = 30) or 0.25% (n = 30). The severity of pain in the immediate recovery period and at 2 and 24 h after surgery was recorded using the visual analogue scale. Differences were assessed by box and whisper plot and the Student's t-test. RESULTS: The analgesic effects of the 0.25% and 0.5% doses were significantly different (P = 0.022) at 30 min after surgery but not after 2 and 24 h. The difference of mean of 0.25% and 0.5% was much higher after 0.5 h but less after 2 and 24 h. CONCLUSIONS: Bupivacaine 0.5% was statistically better for pain control during the immediate postoperative period, but there was no significant difference in pain control between the two dose strengths at 2 and 24 h after surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5564080 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55640802017-09-06 Comparative study of analgesia with bupivacaine 0.25% versus 0.5% for third molar removal under general anesthesia Dhanrajani, Parmanand Chung, Patrick J Dent Anesth Pain Med Original Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and duration of action of two concentrations of bupivacaine with adrenaline for postoperative pain in patients undergoing surgical removal of four third molars under general anesthesia. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing surgical removal of four wisdom teeth received bupivacaine 0.5% (n = 30) or 0.25% (n = 30). The severity of pain in the immediate recovery period and at 2 and 24 h after surgery was recorded using the visual analogue scale. Differences were assessed by box and whisper plot and the Student's t-test. RESULTS: The analgesic effects of the 0.25% and 0.5% doses were significantly different (P = 0.022) at 30 min after surgery but not after 2 and 24 h. The difference of mean of 0.25% and 0.5% was much higher after 0.5 h but less after 2 and 24 h. CONCLUSIONS: Bupivacaine 0.5% was statistically better for pain control during the immediate postoperative period, but there was no significant difference in pain control between the two dose strengths at 2 and 24 h after surgery. The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology 2016-06 2016-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5564080/ /pubmed/28879304 http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2016.16.2.117 Text en Copyright © 2016 Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Dhanrajani, Parmanand Chung, Patrick Comparative study of analgesia with bupivacaine 0.25% versus 0.5% for third molar removal under general anesthesia |
title | Comparative study of analgesia with bupivacaine 0.25% versus 0.5% for third molar removal under general anesthesia |
title_full | Comparative study of analgesia with bupivacaine 0.25% versus 0.5% for third molar removal under general anesthesia |
title_fullStr | Comparative study of analgesia with bupivacaine 0.25% versus 0.5% for third molar removal under general anesthesia |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative study of analgesia with bupivacaine 0.25% versus 0.5% for third molar removal under general anesthesia |
title_short | Comparative study of analgesia with bupivacaine 0.25% versus 0.5% for third molar removal under general anesthesia |
title_sort | comparative study of analgesia with bupivacaine 0.25% versus 0.5% for third molar removal under general anesthesia |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5564080/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28879304 http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2016.16.2.117 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dhanrajaniparmanand comparativestudyofanalgesiawithbupivacaine025versus05forthirdmolarremovalundergeneralanesthesia AT chungpatrick comparativestudyofanalgesiawithbupivacaine025versus05forthirdmolarremovalundergeneralanesthesia |