Cargando…
Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation using two Ni-Ti single file rotary systems: An in vitro study
BACKGROUND: Apical extrusion of debris during instrumentation is detrimental to the patient. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the apical extrusion of debris during root canal instrumentation using two single file rotary Ni-Ti systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty freshly extracted mandibu...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5564245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28855748 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.212236 |
_version_ | 1783258230024044544 |
---|---|
author | Singbal, Kiran Jain, Disha Raja, Kranthi Hoe, Tan Ming |
author_facet | Singbal, Kiran Jain, Disha Raja, Kranthi Hoe, Tan Ming |
author_sort | Singbal, Kiran |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Apical extrusion of debris during instrumentation is detrimental to the patient. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the apical extrusion of debris during root canal instrumentation using two single file rotary Ni-Ti systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty freshly extracted mandibular premolars with straight roots were sterilized and divided into two groups instrumented using: One Shape rotary Ni-Ti system with Endoflare orifice shaper (Group 1) and Neo-Niti rotary Ni-Ti system with C1 orifice shaper (Group 2). Preweighed Eppendorf tubes fitted for each tooth before instrumentation. During instrumentation, 1 mL of distilled water with a 30-gauge needle was used to irrigate after every instrument. Tips of the tooth were irrigated with 2 ml distilled water after removal from Eppendorf tubes. The total volume of irrigant in each group was the same 8 ml. All tubes were incubated at 68°C for 15 days and subsequently weighed. The difference between pre- and post-debris weights was calculated, and statistical analysis was performed using independent t-test and level of significance was set at 0.05. RESULTS: The difference between pre- and post-weights was significantly greater for the One Shape system. CONCLUSIONS: The Neolix Niti single file was associated with less extrusion compared to One Shape single file system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5564245 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55642452017-08-30 Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation using two Ni-Ti single file rotary systems: An in vitro study Singbal, Kiran Jain, Disha Raja, Kranthi Hoe, Tan Ming J Conserv Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: Apical extrusion of debris during instrumentation is detrimental to the patient. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the apical extrusion of debris during root canal instrumentation using two single file rotary Ni-Ti systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty freshly extracted mandibular premolars with straight roots were sterilized and divided into two groups instrumented using: One Shape rotary Ni-Ti system with Endoflare orifice shaper (Group 1) and Neo-Niti rotary Ni-Ti system with C1 orifice shaper (Group 2). Preweighed Eppendorf tubes fitted for each tooth before instrumentation. During instrumentation, 1 mL of distilled water with a 30-gauge needle was used to irrigate after every instrument. Tips of the tooth were irrigated with 2 ml distilled water after removal from Eppendorf tubes. The total volume of irrigant in each group was the same 8 ml. All tubes were incubated at 68°C for 15 days and subsequently weighed. The difference between pre- and post-debris weights was calculated, and statistical analysis was performed using independent t-test and level of significance was set at 0.05. RESULTS: The difference between pre- and post-weights was significantly greater for the One Shape system. CONCLUSIONS: The Neolix Niti single file was associated with less extrusion compared to One Shape single file system. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5564245/ /pubmed/28855748 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.212236 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Singbal, Kiran Jain, Disha Raja, Kranthi Hoe, Tan Ming Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation using two Ni-Ti single file rotary systems: An in vitro study |
title | Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation using two Ni-Ti single file rotary systems: An in vitro study |
title_full | Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation using two Ni-Ti single file rotary systems: An in vitro study |
title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation using two Ni-Ti single file rotary systems: An in vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation using two Ni-Ti single file rotary systems: An in vitro study |
title_short | Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation using two Ni-Ti single file rotary systems: An in vitro study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation using two ni-ti single file rotary systems: an in vitro study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5564245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28855748 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.212236 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singbalkiran comparativeevaluationofapicallyextrudeddebrisduringrootcanalinstrumentationusingtwonitisinglefilerotarysystemsaninvitrostudy AT jaindisha comparativeevaluationofapicallyextrudeddebrisduringrootcanalinstrumentationusingtwonitisinglefilerotarysystemsaninvitrostudy AT rajakranthi comparativeevaluationofapicallyextrudeddebrisduringrootcanalinstrumentationusingtwonitisinglefilerotarysystemsaninvitrostudy AT hoetanming comparativeevaluationofapicallyextrudeddebrisduringrootcanalinstrumentationusingtwonitisinglefilerotarysystemsaninvitrostudy |