Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation using two Ni-Ti single file rotary systems: An in vitro study

BACKGROUND: Apical extrusion of debris during instrumentation is detrimental to the patient. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the apical extrusion of debris during root canal instrumentation using two single file rotary Ni-Ti systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty freshly extracted mandibu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singbal, Kiran, Jain, Disha, Raja, Kranthi, Hoe, Tan Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5564245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28855748
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.212236
_version_ 1783258230024044544
author Singbal, Kiran
Jain, Disha
Raja, Kranthi
Hoe, Tan Ming
author_facet Singbal, Kiran
Jain, Disha
Raja, Kranthi
Hoe, Tan Ming
author_sort Singbal, Kiran
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Apical extrusion of debris during instrumentation is detrimental to the patient. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the apical extrusion of debris during root canal instrumentation using two single file rotary Ni-Ti systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty freshly extracted mandibular premolars with straight roots were sterilized and divided into two groups instrumented using: One Shape rotary Ni-Ti system with Endoflare orifice shaper (Group 1) and Neo-Niti rotary Ni-Ti system with C1 orifice shaper (Group 2). Preweighed Eppendorf tubes fitted for each tooth before instrumentation. During instrumentation, 1 mL of distilled water with a 30-gauge needle was used to irrigate after every instrument. Tips of the tooth were irrigated with 2 ml distilled water after removal from Eppendorf tubes. The total volume of irrigant in each group was the same 8 ml. All tubes were incubated at 68°C for 15 days and subsequently weighed. The difference between pre- and post-debris weights was calculated, and statistical analysis was performed using independent t-test and level of significance was set at 0.05. RESULTS: The difference between pre- and post-weights was significantly greater for the One Shape system. CONCLUSIONS: The Neolix Niti single file was associated with less extrusion compared to One Shape single file system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5564245
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55642452017-08-30 Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation using two Ni-Ti single file rotary systems: An in vitro study Singbal, Kiran Jain, Disha Raja, Kranthi Hoe, Tan Ming J Conserv Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: Apical extrusion of debris during instrumentation is detrimental to the patient. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the apical extrusion of debris during root canal instrumentation using two single file rotary Ni-Ti systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty freshly extracted mandibular premolars with straight roots were sterilized and divided into two groups instrumented using: One Shape rotary Ni-Ti system with Endoflare orifice shaper (Group 1) and Neo-Niti rotary Ni-Ti system with C1 orifice shaper (Group 2). Preweighed Eppendorf tubes fitted for each tooth before instrumentation. During instrumentation, 1 mL of distilled water with a 30-gauge needle was used to irrigate after every instrument. Tips of the tooth were irrigated with 2 ml distilled water after removal from Eppendorf tubes. The total volume of irrigant in each group was the same 8 ml. All tubes were incubated at 68°C for 15 days and subsequently weighed. The difference between pre- and post-debris weights was calculated, and statistical analysis was performed using independent t-test and level of significance was set at 0.05. RESULTS: The difference between pre- and post-weights was significantly greater for the One Shape system. CONCLUSIONS: The Neolix Niti single file was associated with less extrusion compared to One Shape single file system. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5564245/ /pubmed/28855748 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.212236 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Singbal, Kiran
Jain, Disha
Raja, Kranthi
Hoe, Tan Ming
Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation using two Ni-Ti single file rotary systems: An in vitro study
title Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation using two Ni-Ti single file rotary systems: An in vitro study
title_full Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation using two Ni-Ti single file rotary systems: An in vitro study
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation using two Ni-Ti single file rotary systems: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation using two Ni-Ti single file rotary systems: An in vitro study
title_short Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation using two Ni-Ti single file rotary systems: An in vitro study
title_sort comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation using two ni-ti single file rotary systems: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5564245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28855748
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.212236
work_keys_str_mv AT singbalkiran comparativeevaluationofapicallyextrudeddebrisduringrootcanalinstrumentationusingtwonitisinglefilerotarysystemsaninvitrostudy
AT jaindisha comparativeevaluationofapicallyextrudeddebrisduringrootcanalinstrumentationusingtwonitisinglefilerotarysystemsaninvitrostudy
AT rajakranthi comparativeevaluationofapicallyextrudeddebrisduringrootcanalinstrumentationusingtwonitisinglefilerotarysystemsaninvitrostudy
AT hoetanming comparativeevaluationofapicallyextrudeddebrisduringrootcanalinstrumentationusingtwonitisinglefilerotarysystemsaninvitrostudy