Cargando…

Evaluation of different fibers and biodentine as alternates to crown coverage for endodontically treated molars: An in vitro study

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the fracture resistance of newer restorative materials that could serve as an alternate to crown coverage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty extracted human mandibular molar teeth were selected for this study and were divided into four groups (n = 10)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hiremath, Hemalatha, Kulkarni, Sadanand, Hiremath, Vishwanath, Kotipalli, Madhavi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5564247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28855750
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.212248
_version_ 1783258230570352640
author Hiremath, Hemalatha
Kulkarni, Sadanand
Hiremath, Vishwanath
Kotipalli, Madhavi
author_facet Hiremath, Hemalatha
Kulkarni, Sadanand
Hiremath, Vishwanath
Kotipalli, Madhavi
author_sort Hiremath, Hemalatha
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the fracture resistance of newer restorative materials that could serve as an alternate to crown coverage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty extracted human mandibular molar teeth were selected for this study and were divided into four groups (n = 10). All the teeth in the experimental groups (Group 2–4) were subjected to access cavity preparation with roughly 1.5 mm of tooth structure remaining throughout the circumference. Group 1: Intact teeth used as control. Group 2: Access cavities reinforced with biodentine. Group 3: Inner circumference of access cavities reinforced with polyethylene fiber and nano-hybrid composite. Group 4: Access cavities were reinforced with fiber reinforced composite. All the teeth were subjected to fracture resistance using universal testing machine. RESULTS: The results of the study were evaluated statistically using one-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test. Group 2 demonstrated the least mean values of fracture resistance and was significantly different from the control and other experimental groups. Statistically significant difference among Groups 1, 3, and 4 was not found. CONCLUSION: Within the limitation of this in vitro study, it can be concluded that fiber reinforced composite and polyethylene fibers with nanohybrid composite could serve as an alternate to crown coverage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5564247
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55642472017-08-30 Evaluation of different fibers and biodentine as alternates to crown coverage for endodontically treated molars: An in vitro study Hiremath, Hemalatha Kulkarni, Sadanand Hiremath, Vishwanath Kotipalli, Madhavi J Conserv Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the fracture resistance of newer restorative materials that could serve as an alternate to crown coverage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty extracted human mandibular molar teeth were selected for this study and were divided into four groups (n = 10). All the teeth in the experimental groups (Group 2–4) were subjected to access cavity preparation with roughly 1.5 mm of tooth structure remaining throughout the circumference. Group 1: Intact teeth used as control. Group 2: Access cavities reinforced with biodentine. Group 3: Inner circumference of access cavities reinforced with polyethylene fiber and nano-hybrid composite. Group 4: Access cavities were reinforced with fiber reinforced composite. All the teeth were subjected to fracture resistance using universal testing machine. RESULTS: The results of the study were evaluated statistically using one-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test. Group 2 demonstrated the least mean values of fracture resistance and was significantly different from the control and other experimental groups. Statistically significant difference among Groups 1, 3, and 4 was not found. CONCLUSION: Within the limitation of this in vitro study, it can be concluded that fiber reinforced composite and polyethylene fibers with nanohybrid composite could serve as an alternate to crown coverage. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5564247/ /pubmed/28855750 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.212248 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hiremath, Hemalatha
Kulkarni, Sadanand
Hiremath, Vishwanath
Kotipalli, Madhavi
Evaluation of different fibers and biodentine as alternates to crown coverage for endodontically treated molars: An in vitro study
title Evaluation of different fibers and biodentine as alternates to crown coverage for endodontically treated molars: An in vitro study
title_full Evaluation of different fibers and biodentine as alternates to crown coverage for endodontically treated molars: An in vitro study
title_fullStr Evaluation of different fibers and biodentine as alternates to crown coverage for endodontically treated molars: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of different fibers and biodentine as alternates to crown coverage for endodontically treated molars: An in vitro study
title_short Evaluation of different fibers and biodentine as alternates to crown coverage for endodontically treated molars: An in vitro study
title_sort evaluation of different fibers and biodentine as alternates to crown coverage for endodontically treated molars: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5564247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28855750
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.212248
work_keys_str_mv AT hiremathhemalatha evaluationofdifferentfibersandbiodentineasalternatestocrowncoverageforendodonticallytreatedmolarsaninvitrostudy
AT kulkarnisadanand evaluationofdifferentfibersandbiodentineasalternatestocrowncoverageforendodonticallytreatedmolarsaninvitrostudy
AT hiremathvishwanath evaluationofdifferentfibersandbiodentineasalternatestocrowncoverageforendodonticallytreatedmolarsaninvitrostudy
AT kotipallimadhavi evaluationofdifferentfibersandbiodentineasalternatestocrowncoverageforendodonticallytreatedmolarsaninvitrostudy