Cargando…
Evaluation of different fibers and biodentine as alternates to crown coverage for endodontically treated molars: An in vitro study
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the fracture resistance of newer restorative materials that could serve as an alternate to crown coverage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty extracted human mandibular molar teeth were selected for this study and were divided into four groups (n = 10)...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5564247/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28855750 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.212248 |
_version_ | 1783258230570352640 |
---|---|
author | Hiremath, Hemalatha Kulkarni, Sadanand Hiremath, Vishwanath Kotipalli, Madhavi |
author_facet | Hiremath, Hemalatha Kulkarni, Sadanand Hiremath, Vishwanath Kotipalli, Madhavi |
author_sort | Hiremath, Hemalatha |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the fracture resistance of newer restorative materials that could serve as an alternate to crown coverage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty extracted human mandibular molar teeth were selected for this study and were divided into four groups (n = 10). All the teeth in the experimental groups (Group 2–4) were subjected to access cavity preparation with roughly 1.5 mm of tooth structure remaining throughout the circumference. Group 1: Intact teeth used as control. Group 2: Access cavities reinforced with biodentine. Group 3: Inner circumference of access cavities reinforced with polyethylene fiber and nano-hybrid composite. Group 4: Access cavities were reinforced with fiber reinforced composite. All the teeth were subjected to fracture resistance using universal testing machine. RESULTS: The results of the study were evaluated statistically using one-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test. Group 2 demonstrated the least mean values of fracture resistance and was significantly different from the control and other experimental groups. Statistically significant difference among Groups 1, 3, and 4 was not found. CONCLUSION: Within the limitation of this in vitro study, it can be concluded that fiber reinforced composite and polyethylene fibers with nanohybrid composite could serve as an alternate to crown coverage. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5564247 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55642472017-08-30 Evaluation of different fibers and biodentine as alternates to crown coverage for endodontically treated molars: An in vitro study Hiremath, Hemalatha Kulkarni, Sadanand Hiremath, Vishwanath Kotipalli, Madhavi J Conserv Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the fracture resistance of newer restorative materials that could serve as an alternate to crown coverage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty extracted human mandibular molar teeth were selected for this study and were divided into four groups (n = 10). All the teeth in the experimental groups (Group 2–4) were subjected to access cavity preparation with roughly 1.5 mm of tooth structure remaining throughout the circumference. Group 1: Intact teeth used as control. Group 2: Access cavities reinforced with biodentine. Group 3: Inner circumference of access cavities reinforced with polyethylene fiber and nano-hybrid composite. Group 4: Access cavities were reinforced with fiber reinforced composite. All the teeth were subjected to fracture resistance using universal testing machine. RESULTS: The results of the study were evaluated statistically using one-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test. Group 2 demonstrated the least mean values of fracture resistance and was significantly different from the control and other experimental groups. Statistically significant difference among Groups 1, 3, and 4 was not found. CONCLUSION: Within the limitation of this in vitro study, it can be concluded that fiber reinforced composite and polyethylene fibers with nanohybrid composite could serve as an alternate to crown coverage. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5564247/ /pubmed/28855750 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.212248 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hiremath, Hemalatha Kulkarni, Sadanand Hiremath, Vishwanath Kotipalli, Madhavi Evaluation of different fibers and biodentine as alternates to crown coverage for endodontically treated molars: An in vitro study |
title | Evaluation of different fibers and biodentine as alternates to crown coverage for endodontically treated molars: An in vitro study |
title_full | Evaluation of different fibers and biodentine as alternates to crown coverage for endodontically treated molars: An in vitro study |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of different fibers and biodentine as alternates to crown coverage for endodontically treated molars: An in vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of different fibers and biodentine as alternates to crown coverage for endodontically treated molars: An in vitro study |
title_short | Evaluation of different fibers and biodentine as alternates to crown coverage for endodontically treated molars: An in vitro study |
title_sort | evaluation of different fibers and biodentine as alternates to crown coverage for endodontically treated molars: an in vitro study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5564247/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28855750 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.212248 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hiremathhemalatha evaluationofdifferentfibersandbiodentineasalternatestocrowncoverageforendodonticallytreatedmolarsaninvitrostudy AT kulkarnisadanand evaluationofdifferentfibersandbiodentineasalternatestocrowncoverageforendodonticallytreatedmolarsaninvitrostudy AT hiremathvishwanath evaluationofdifferentfibersandbiodentineasalternatestocrowncoverageforendodonticallytreatedmolarsaninvitrostudy AT kotipallimadhavi evaluationofdifferentfibersandbiodentineasalternatestocrowncoverageforendodonticallytreatedmolarsaninvitrostudy |