Cargando…
Preservation of root canal anatomy using self-adjusting file instrumentation with glide path prepared by 20/0.02 hand files versus 20/0.04 rotary files
OBJECTIVES: To compare the relative axis modification and canal concentricity after glide path preparation with 20/0.02 hand K-file (NITIFLEX(®)) and 20/0.04 rotary file (HyFlex™ CM) with subsequent instrumentation with 1.5 mm self-adjusting file (SAF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty...
Autores principales: | Jain, Niharika, Pawar, Ajinkya M., Ukey, Piyush D., Jain, Prashant K., Thakur, Bhagyashree, Gupta, Abhishek |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5564249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28855752 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.212231 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Assessment of the fracture resistance of teeth instrumented using 2 rotary and 2 reciprocating files versus the Self-Adjusting File (SAF): An ex vivo comparative study on mandibular premolars
por: Pawar, Ajinkya M, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Evaluation of Canal Transportation after Using Different Types Rotary Glide Path Files
por: Shalan, Linz Ali, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
In vitro comparison of apical leakage in root canals obturated with 0.04 and 0.02 tapered gutta-percha
por: Bidar, Maryam, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Effect of glide path preparation on apical extrusion of debris in root canals instrumented with three single-file systems: An ex vivo comparative study
por: Pawar, Ajinkya M., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Glide Path Rotary Files: A Systematic Review of in Vitro Studies
por: Ashkar, Israa, et al.
Publicado: (2022)