Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of apical microleakage in immediate and delayed postspace preparation using four different root canal sealers: An in vitro study

BACKGROUND: Endodontically treated teeth often lack sufficient support for a permanent restoration. During post space preparation, it is important not to disturb the integrity of the apical seal. AIM: This study compared the effect of immediate versus delayed post space preparation on the apical sea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Padmanabhan, Prabeesh, Das, Joydeep, Kumari, R. Veena, Pradeep, P. R., Kumar, Ankur, Agarwal, Sneha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5564250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28855753
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.212230
_version_ 1783258231299112960
author Padmanabhan, Prabeesh
Das, Joydeep
Kumari, R. Veena
Pradeep, P. R.
Kumar, Ankur
Agarwal, Sneha
author_facet Padmanabhan, Prabeesh
Das, Joydeep
Kumari, R. Veena
Pradeep, P. R.
Kumar, Ankur
Agarwal, Sneha
author_sort Padmanabhan, Prabeesh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Endodontically treated teeth often lack sufficient support for a permanent restoration. During post space preparation, it is important not to disturb the integrity of the apical seal. AIM: This study compared the effect of immediate versus delayed post space preparation on the apical seal using four different sealers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and thirty single rooted teeth were biomechanically prepared and obturated with single cone gutta-percha and 4 sealers: Endoflas FS, AH Plus, Gutta flow and MTA. Teeth were divided randomly into eight groups, post spaces were prepared using Gates Glidden drills immediately for group I, III, IV and VII. For groups II, IV, VI and VIII prepared after storage of the specimens in 100% humidity for one week. The samples were kept in methylene blue dye, centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 3 min sectioned and then measured under stereomicroscope for apical leakage. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The data was analysed using one way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test. RESULTS: All the specimens showed dye leakage, and a statistically significant difference was seen among all the groups (P > 0.05) except Gutta flow. CONCLUSION: Less leakage is seen when post space is prepared immediately.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5564250
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55642502017-08-30 Comparative evaluation of apical microleakage in immediate and delayed postspace preparation using four different root canal sealers: An in vitro study Padmanabhan, Prabeesh Das, Joydeep Kumari, R. Veena Pradeep, P. R. Kumar, Ankur Agarwal, Sneha J Conserv Dent Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Endodontically treated teeth often lack sufficient support for a permanent restoration. During post space preparation, it is important not to disturb the integrity of the apical seal. AIM: This study compared the effect of immediate versus delayed post space preparation on the apical seal using four different sealers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and thirty single rooted teeth were biomechanically prepared and obturated with single cone gutta-percha and 4 sealers: Endoflas FS, AH Plus, Gutta flow and MTA. Teeth were divided randomly into eight groups, post spaces were prepared using Gates Glidden drills immediately for group I, III, IV and VII. For groups II, IV, VI and VIII prepared after storage of the specimens in 100% humidity for one week. The samples were kept in methylene blue dye, centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 3 min sectioned and then measured under stereomicroscope for apical leakage. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The data was analysed using one way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test. RESULTS: All the specimens showed dye leakage, and a statistically significant difference was seen among all the groups (P > 0.05) except Gutta flow. CONCLUSION: Less leakage is seen when post space is prepared immediately. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5564250/ /pubmed/28855753 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.212230 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Padmanabhan, Prabeesh
Das, Joydeep
Kumari, R. Veena
Pradeep, P. R.
Kumar, Ankur
Agarwal, Sneha
Comparative evaluation of apical microleakage in immediate and delayed postspace preparation using four different root canal sealers: An in vitro study
title Comparative evaluation of apical microleakage in immediate and delayed postspace preparation using four different root canal sealers: An in vitro study
title_full Comparative evaluation of apical microleakage in immediate and delayed postspace preparation using four different root canal sealers: An in vitro study
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of apical microleakage in immediate and delayed postspace preparation using four different root canal sealers: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of apical microleakage in immediate and delayed postspace preparation using four different root canal sealers: An in vitro study
title_short Comparative evaluation of apical microleakage in immediate and delayed postspace preparation using four different root canal sealers: An in vitro study
title_sort comparative evaluation of apical microleakage in immediate and delayed postspace preparation using four different root canal sealers: an in vitro study
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5564250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28855753
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.212230
work_keys_str_mv AT padmanabhanprabeesh comparativeevaluationofapicalmicroleakageinimmediateanddelayedpostspacepreparationusingfourdifferentrootcanalsealersaninvitrostudy
AT dasjoydeep comparativeevaluationofapicalmicroleakageinimmediateanddelayedpostspacepreparationusingfourdifferentrootcanalsealersaninvitrostudy
AT kumarirveena comparativeevaluationofapicalmicroleakageinimmediateanddelayedpostspacepreparationusingfourdifferentrootcanalsealersaninvitrostudy
AT pradeeppr comparativeevaluationofapicalmicroleakageinimmediateanddelayedpostspacepreparationusingfourdifferentrootcanalsealersaninvitrostudy
AT kumarankur comparativeevaluationofapicalmicroleakageinimmediateanddelayedpostspacepreparationusingfourdifferentrootcanalsealersaninvitrostudy
AT agarwalsneha comparativeevaluationofapicalmicroleakageinimmediateanddelayedpostspacepreparationusingfourdifferentrootcanalsealersaninvitrostudy