Cargando…
Clinical evaluation of integrated panel testing by next-generation sequencing for somatic mutations in neuroblastomas with MYCN unamplification
Neuroblastomas (NBs) exhibit heterogeneity and show clinically significant prognosis classified by genetic alterations. Among prognostic genes or genome factors, MYCN amplification (MNA) is the most established genomic marker of poor prognosis in patients with NB. However, the prognostic classificat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5564799/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28591696 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.17917 |
_version_ | 1783258306799730688 |
---|---|
author | Cao, Yanna Jin, Yan Yu, Jinpu Wang, Jingfu Qiu, Yanli Duan, Xiaofeng Ye, Yingnan Cheng, Yanan Dong, Li Feng, Xiaolong Wang, Daowei Li, Zhongyuan Tian, Xiangdong Wang, Huijuan Yan, Jie Zhao, Qiang |
author_facet | Cao, Yanna Jin, Yan Yu, Jinpu Wang, Jingfu Qiu, Yanli Duan, Xiaofeng Ye, Yingnan Cheng, Yanan Dong, Li Feng, Xiaolong Wang, Daowei Li, Zhongyuan Tian, Xiangdong Wang, Huijuan Yan, Jie Zhao, Qiang |
author_sort | Cao, Yanna |
collection | PubMed |
description | Neuroblastomas (NBs) exhibit heterogeneity and show clinically significant prognosis classified by genetic alterations. Among prognostic genes or genome factors, MYCN amplification (MNA) is the most established genomic marker of poor prognosis in patients with NB. However, the prognostic classification of more than 60% of patients without MNA has yet to be clarified. In this study, the application of target next-generation sequencing (NGS) was extended on the basis of a comprehensive panel of regions where copy number variations (CNVs) or point mutations occurred to improve the prognostic evaluation of these patients and obtain the sequence of 33 patients without MNA. A mean coverage depth of 887× was determined in the target regions in all of the samples, and the mapped read percentage was more than 99%. Somatic mutations in patients without MNA could be precisely defined on the basis of these findings, and 17 unique somatic aberrations, including 14 genes, were identified in 11 patients. Among these variations, most were CNVs with a number of 13. The 3-year event-free survival (EFS) of CNV(−) patients was 60.0% compared with the EFS (16.7%) of CNV(+) patients (P = 0.015, HR = 0.1344, 95%, CI = 0.027 to 0.678). CNVs were also associated with unfavorable histological characteristics (P = 0.003) and likely to occur in stage 4 (P = 0.041). These results might further indicate the role of CNVs in NB chemotherapy resistance (P = 0.059) and show CNVs as a therapeutic target. In multivariate analysis, the presence of CNVs was a clinically negative prognostic marker that impaired the outcome of patients without MNA and associated with poor prognosis in this tumor subset. Comprehensive genetic/genomic profiling instead of focusing on single genetic marker should be performed through in-depth NGS that could reveal prognostic information, improve NB target therapy, and provide a basis for investigations on NB pathogenesis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5564799 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55647992017-08-23 Clinical evaluation of integrated panel testing by next-generation sequencing for somatic mutations in neuroblastomas with MYCN unamplification Cao, Yanna Jin, Yan Yu, Jinpu Wang, Jingfu Qiu, Yanli Duan, Xiaofeng Ye, Yingnan Cheng, Yanan Dong, Li Feng, Xiaolong Wang, Daowei Li, Zhongyuan Tian, Xiangdong Wang, Huijuan Yan, Jie Zhao, Qiang Oncotarget Research Paper Neuroblastomas (NBs) exhibit heterogeneity and show clinically significant prognosis classified by genetic alterations. Among prognostic genes or genome factors, MYCN amplification (MNA) is the most established genomic marker of poor prognosis in patients with NB. However, the prognostic classification of more than 60% of patients without MNA has yet to be clarified. In this study, the application of target next-generation sequencing (NGS) was extended on the basis of a comprehensive panel of regions where copy number variations (CNVs) or point mutations occurred to improve the prognostic evaluation of these patients and obtain the sequence of 33 patients without MNA. A mean coverage depth of 887× was determined in the target regions in all of the samples, and the mapped read percentage was more than 99%. Somatic mutations in patients without MNA could be precisely defined on the basis of these findings, and 17 unique somatic aberrations, including 14 genes, were identified in 11 patients. Among these variations, most were CNVs with a number of 13. The 3-year event-free survival (EFS) of CNV(−) patients was 60.0% compared with the EFS (16.7%) of CNV(+) patients (P = 0.015, HR = 0.1344, 95%, CI = 0.027 to 0.678). CNVs were also associated with unfavorable histological characteristics (P = 0.003) and likely to occur in stage 4 (P = 0.041). These results might further indicate the role of CNVs in NB chemotherapy resistance (P = 0.059) and show CNVs as a therapeutic target. In multivariate analysis, the presence of CNVs was a clinically negative prognostic marker that impaired the outcome of patients without MNA and associated with poor prognosis in this tumor subset. Comprehensive genetic/genomic profiling instead of focusing on single genetic marker should be performed through in-depth NGS that could reveal prognostic information, improve NB target therapy, and provide a basis for investigations on NB pathogenesis. Impact Journals LLC 2017-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5564799/ /pubmed/28591696 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.17917 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Cao et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Cao, Yanna Jin, Yan Yu, Jinpu Wang, Jingfu Qiu, Yanli Duan, Xiaofeng Ye, Yingnan Cheng, Yanan Dong, Li Feng, Xiaolong Wang, Daowei Li, Zhongyuan Tian, Xiangdong Wang, Huijuan Yan, Jie Zhao, Qiang Clinical evaluation of integrated panel testing by next-generation sequencing for somatic mutations in neuroblastomas with MYCN unamplification |
title | Clinical evaluation of integrated panel testing by next-generation sequencing for somatic mutations in neuroblastomas with MYCN unamplification |
title_full | Clinical evaluation of integrated panel testing by next-generation sequencing for somatic mutations in neuroblastomas with MYCN unamplification |
title_fullStr | Clinical evaluation of integrated panel testing by next-generation sequencing for somatic mutations in neuroblastomas with MYCN unamplification |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical evaluation of integrated panel testing by next-generation sequencing for somatic mutations in neuroblastomas with MYCN unamplification |
title_short | Clinical evaluation of integrated panel testing by next-generation sequencing for somatic mutations in neuroblastomas with MYCN unamplification |
title_sort | clinical evaluation of integrated panel testing by next-generation sequencing for somatic mutations in neuroblastomas with mycn unamplification |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5564799/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28591696 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.17917 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caoyanna clinicalevaluationofintegratedpaneltestingbynextgenerationsequencingforsomaticmutationsinneuroblastomaswithmycnunamplification AT jinyan clinicalevaluationofintegratedpaneltestingbynextgenerationsequencingforsomaticmutationsinneuroblastomaswithmycnunamplification AT yujinpu clinicalevaluationofintegratedpaneltestingbynextgenerationsequencingforsomaticmutationsinneuroblastomaswithmycnunamplification AT wangjingfu clinicalevaluationofintegratedpaneltestingbynextgenerationsequencingforsomaticmutationsinneuroblastomaswithmycnunamplification AT qiuyanli clinicalevaluationofintegratedpaneltestingbynextgenerationsequencingforsomaticmutationsinneuroblastomaswithmycnunamplification AT duanxiaofeng clinicalevaluationofintegratedpaneltestingbynextgenerationsequencingforsomaticmutationsinneuroblastomaswithmycnunamplification AT yeyingnan clinicalevaluationofintegratedpaneltestingbynextgenerationsequencingforsomaticmutationsinneuroblastomaswithmycnunamplification AT chengyanan clinicalevaluationofintegratedpaneltestingbynextgenerationsequencingforsomaticmutationsinneuroblastomaswithmycnunamplification AT dongli clinicalevaluationofintegratedpaneltestingbynextgenerationsequencingforsomaticmutationsinneuroblastomaswithmycnunamplification AT fengxiaolong clinicalevaluationofintegratedpaneltestingbynextgenerationsequencingforsomaticmutationsinneuroblastomaswithmycnunamplification AT wangdaowei clinicalevaluationofintegratedpaneltestingbynextgenerationsequencingforsomaticmutationsinneuroblastomaswithmycnunamplification AT lizhongyuan clinicalevaluationofintegratedpaneltestingbynextgenerationsequencingforsomaticmutationsinneuroblastomaswithmycnunamplification AT tianxiangdong clinicalevaluationofintegratedpaneltestingbynextgenerationsequencingforsomaticmutationsinneuroblastomaswithmycnunamplification AT wanghuijuan clinicalevaluationofintegratedpaneltestingbynextgenerationsequencingforsomaticmutationsinneuroblastomaswithmycnunamplification AT yanjie clinicalevaluationofintegratedpaneltestingbynextgenerationsequencingforsomaticmutationsinneuroblastomaswithmycnunamplification AT zhaoqiang clinicalevaluationofintegratedpaneltestingbynextgenerationsequencingforsomaticmutationsinneuroblastomaswithmycnunamplification |