Cargando…

Comparison of Scapular Kinematics and Range of Motion Between Normal and Post-operative Shoulders Following Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis

OBJECTIVES: Though many surgeons advocate biceps tenodesis for treatment of intra-articular biceps pathology, little is known about the biomechanical effects this may have on the glenohumeral joint. The purpose of the present study is to describe in detail the effect of biceps tenodesis on shoulder...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cairns, Mark Andrew, Helms, Jonathan R., Hibberd, Elizabeth, Myers, Joseph, Kamath, Ganesh V., Spang, Jeffrey T., Creighton, Robert Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5564869/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967117S00392
_version_ 1783258323569606656
author Cairns, Mark Andrew
Helms, Jonathan R.
Hibberd, Elizabeth
Myers, Joseph
Kamath, Ganesh V.
Spang, Jeffrey T.
Creighton, Robert Alexander
author_facet Cairns, Mark Andrew
Helms, Jonathan R.
Hibberd, Elizabeth
Myers, Joseph
Kamath, Ganesh V.
Spang, Jeffrey T.
Creighton, Robert Alexander
author_sort Cairns, Mark Andrew
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Though many surgeons advocate biceps tenodesis for treatment of intra-articular biceps pathology, little is known about the biomechanical effects this may have on the glenohumeral joint. The purpose of the present study is to describe in detail the effect of biceps tenodesis on shoulder muscle strength, range of motion, and scapular motion. We hypothesized that post-surgical shoulders would not show significant differences in range of motion, strength, and kinematics when compared to the uninvolved shoulder. METHODS: 22 patients underwent a subpectoral biceps tenodesis and were evaluated at least 6 months following the procedure. We evaluated range of motion, strength, and scapular kinematics. Measures included glenohumeral abduction, internal and external rotation, elbow flexion and extension, internal and external rotation strength, and scapular kinematics. Subjects also completed the DASH questionnaire. RESULTS: The average DASH score was 5.3 +/- 6.3 following surgery. The post-surgical shoulder showed a significant 8.3 degree decrease (p = 0.003) in glenohumeral abduction external rotation compared to the uninvolved shoulder. However, there were no significant differences in other measurements of glenohumeral motion or strength. Kinematic data revealed significantly increased scapular internal rotation (p = 0.02) and anterior tipping (p = 0.019) while reaching for the contralateral shoulder. CONCLUSION: The majority of outcome measures were equivalent when comparing the post-surgical and uninvolved shoulder function and biomechanics. Significant findings include a loss of glenohumeral abduction external rotation after surgery as well as anterior scapular tipping and rotation while reaching for the contralateral shoulder. Overall, subjects expressed minimal disability following surgery, as evidenced by their DASH scores. Nonetheless, we recommend a vigilant focus on regaining external rotation following open subpectoral biceps tenodesis in an attempt to limit or prevent loss of shoulder motion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5564869
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55648692017-08-24 Comparison of Scapular Kinematics and Range of Motion Between Normal and Post-operative Shoulders Following Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Cairns, Mark Andrew Helms, Jonathan R. Hibberd, Elizabeth Myers, Joseph Kamath, Ganesh V. Spang, Jeffrey T. Creighton, Robert Alexander Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: Though many surgeons advocate biceps tenodesis for treatment of intra-articular biceps pathology, little is known about the biomechanical effects this may have on the glenohumeral joint. The purpose of the present study is to describe in detail the effect of biceps tenodesis on shoulder muscle strength, range of motion, and scapular motion. We hypothesized that post-surgical shoulders would not show significant differences in range of motion, strength, and kinematics when compared to the uninvolved shoulder. METHODS: 22 patients underwent a subpectoral biceps tenodesis and were evaluated at least 6 months following the procedure. We evaluated range of motion, strength, and scapular kinematics. Measures included glenohumeral abduction, internal and external rotation, elbow flexion and extension, internal and external rotation strength, and scapular kinematics. Subjects also completed the DASH questionnaire. RESULTS: The average DASH score was 5.3 +/- 6.3 following surgery. The post-surgical shoulder showed a significant 8.3 degree decrease (p = 0.003) in glenohumeral abduction external rotation compared to the uninvolved shoulder. However, there were no significant differences in other measurements of glenohumeral motion or strength. Kinematic data revealed significantly increased scapular internal rotation (p = 0.02) and anterior tipping (p = 0.019) while reaching for the contralateral shoulder. CONCLUSION: The majority of outcome measures were equivalent when comparing the post-surgical and uninvolved shoulder function and biomechanics. Significant findings include a loss of glenohumeral abduction external rotation after surgery as well as anterior scapular tipping and rotation while reaching for the contralateral shoulder. Overall, subjects expressed minimal disability following surgery, as evidenced by their DASH scores. Nonetheless, we recommend a vigilant focus on regaining external rotation following open subpectoral biceps tenodesis in an attempt to limit or prevent loss of shoulder motion. SAGE Publications 2017-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5564869/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967117S00392 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For reprints and permission queries, please visit SAGE’s Web site at http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav.
spellingShingle Article
Cairns, Mark Andrew
Helms, Jonathan R.
Hibberd, Elizabeth
Myers, Joseph
Kamath, Ganesh V.
Spang, Jeffrey T.
Creighton, Robert Alexander
Comparison of Scapular Kinematics and Range of Motion Between Normal and Post-operative Shoulders Following Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis
title Comparison of Scapular Kinematics and Range of Motion Between Normal and Post-operative Shoulders Following Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis
title_full Comparison of Scapular Kinematics and Range of Motion Between Normal and Post-operative Shoulders Following Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis
title_fullStr Comparison of Scapular Kinematics and Range of Motion Between Normal and Post-operative Shoulders Following Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Scapular Kinematics and Range of Motion Between Normal and Post-operative Shoulders Following Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis
title_short Comparison of Scapular Kinematics and Range of Motion Between Normal and Post-operative Shoulders Following Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis
title_sort comparison of scapular kinematics and range of motion between normal and post-operative shoulders following subpectoral biceps tenodesis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5564869/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967117S00392
work_keys_str_mv AT cairnsmarkandrew comparisonofscapularkinematicsandrangeofmotionbetweennormalandpostoperativeshouldersfollowingsubpectoralbicepstenodesis
AT helmsjonathanr comparisonofscapularkinematicsandrangeofmotionbetweennormalandpostoperativeshouldersfollowingsubpectoralbicepstenodesis
AT hibberdelizabeth comparisonofscapularkinematicsandrangeofmotionbetweennormalandpostoperativeshouldersfollowingsubpectoralbicepstenodesis
AT myersjoseph comparisonofscapularkinematicsandrangeofmotionbetweennormalandpostoperativeshouldersfollowingsubpectoralbicepstenodesis
AT kamathganeshv comparisonofscapularkinematicsandrangeofmotionbetweennormalandpostoperativeshouldersfollowingsubpectoralbicepstenodesis
AT spangjeffreyt comparisonofscapularkinematicsandrangeofmotionbetweennormalandpostoperativeshouldersfollowingsubpectoralbicepstenodesis
AT creightonrobertalexander comparisonofscapularkinematicsandrangeofmotionbetweennormalandpostoperativeshouldersfollowingsubpectoralbicepstenodesis