Cargando…
Concomitant Lumbar Spine Pathology in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy: A Matched Cohort Analysis
OBJECTIVES: Hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and related hip pathology is increasing in volume. Variable presentations of hip pain often lead to confusion with lumbar spine pathology however. We sought to define the relationship between the lumbar spine and the hip joint. Our h...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5565009/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967117S00422 |
_version_ | 1783258344395374592 |
---|---|
author | Mahure, Siddharth Ashok Ryan, Michael K. Buckland, Aaron Hamula, Mathew Begly, John Capogna, Brian Looze, Chris Chenard, Kristofer E. Wolfson, Theodore Youm, Thomas |
author_facet | Mahure, Siddharth Ashok Ryan, Michael K. Buckland, Aaron Hamula, Mathew Begly, John Capogna, Brian Looze, Chris Chenard, Kristofer E. Wolfson, Theodore Youm, Thomas |
author_sort | Mahure, Siddharth Ashok |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and related hip pathology is increasing in volume. Variable presentations of hip pain often lead to confusion with lumbar spine pathology however. We sought to define the relationship between the lumbar spine and the hip joint. Our hypothesis is that patients with concurrent lumbar spine pathology will experience inferior outcomes after hip arthroscopy when compared to patients without lumbar spine pathology. METHODS: Prospectively-collected data from a single-surgeon database from 2010 to 2014 was used to identify patients who had undergone hip arthroscopy and had documented concurrent lumbar spine pathology. Patients with spine pathology were matched by age, gender, and BMI in a 3:1 fashion to patients without spine pathology. Baseline pre-operative modified Harris Hip Scores (mHHS) were compared to scores at two-year follow-up. “Poor outcome” of initial hip arthroscopy was defined as any combination of: requiring a revision procedure, conversion to THA, or mHHS below 70. RESULTS: 167 patients met inclusion criteria: 72.5% were “normal” while 27.5% had spine pathology. Baseline demographics were appropriately matched between cohorts (Table I). Preoperative and two-year mHHS scores were significantly different between cohorts (Figure 1). Both cohorts demonstrated significant within-group improvement at two-year follow-up, however normal patients had greater improvements than those with spine pathology (34.0 vs 31.76, p<0.001). Overall revision/THA conversion rate for entire cohort was 14.97%, with nearly twice as many spine co-pathology patients requiring additional surgery than those in the normal cohort (23.91% vs 11.57%, p=0.045). Patients with spine pathology were significantly more likely to have “poor outcomes” than those without spine pathology (36.96% vs 21.49%, p=0.048). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that patients undergoing hip arthroscopy with concomitant lumbar spine pathology demonstrate significantly lower total improvement, significantly higher revision/THA conversion rates and significantly higher rates of suboptimal outcomes after hip arthroscopy than patients without spine pathology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5565009 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55650092017-08-24 Concomitant Lumbar Spine Pathology in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy: A Matched Cohort Analysis Mahure, Siddharth Ashok Ryan, Michael K. Buckland, Aaron Hamula, Mathew Begly, John Capogna, Brian Looze, Chris Chenard, Kristofer E. Wolfson, Theodore Youm, Thomas Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: Hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and related hip pathology is increasing in volume. Variable presentations of hip pain often lead to confusion with lumbar spine pathology however. We sought to define the relationship between the lumbar spine and the hip joint. Our hypothesis is that patients with concurrent lumbar spine pathology will experience inferior outcomes after hip arthroscopy when compared to patients without lumbar spine pathology. METHODS: Prospectively-collected data from a single-surgeon database from 2010 to 2014 was used to identify patients who had undergone hip arthroscopy and had documented concurrent lumbar spine pathology. Patients with spine pathology were matched by age, gender, and BMI in a 3:1 fashion to patients without spine pathology. Baseline pre-operative modified Harris Hip Scores (mHHS) were compared to scores at two-year follow-up. “Poor outcome” of initial hip arthroscopy was defined as any combination of: requiring a revision procedure, conversion to THA, or mHHS below 70. RESULTS: 167 patients met inclusion criteria: 72.5% were “normal” while 27.5% had spine pathology. Baseline demographics were appropriately matched between cohorts (Table I). Preoperative and two-year mHHS scores were significantly different between cohorts (Figure 1). Both cohorts demonstrated significant within-group improvement at two-year follow-up, however normal patients had greater improvements than those with spine pathology (34.0 vs 31.76, p<0.001). Overall revision/THA conversion rate for entire cohort was 14.97%, with nearly twice as many spine co-pathology patients requiring additional surgery than those in the normal cohort (23.91% vs 11.57%, p=0.045). Patients with spine pathology were significantly more likely to have “poor outcomes” than those without spine pathology (36.96% vs 21.49%, p=0.048). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that patients undergoing hip arthroscopy with concomitant lumbar spine pathology demonstrate significantly lower total improvement, significantly higher revision/THA conversion rates and significantly higher rates of suboptimal outcomes after hip arthroscopy than patients without spine pathology. SAGE Publications 2017-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5565009/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967117S00422 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For reprints and permission queries, please visit SAGE’s Web site at http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav. |
spellingShingle | Article Mahure, Siddharth Ashok Ryan, Michael K. Buckland, Aaron Hamula, Mathew Begly, John Capogna, Brian Looze, Chris Chenard, Kristofer E. Wolfson, Theodore Youm, Thomas Concomitant Lumbar Spine Pathology in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy: A Matched Cohort Analysis |
title | Concomitant Lumbar Spine Pathology in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy: A Matched Cohort Analysis |
title_full | Concomitant Lumbar Spine Pathology in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy: A Matched Cohort Analysis |
title_fullStr | Concomitant Lumbar Spine Pathology in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy: A Matched Cohort Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Concomitant Lumbar Spine Pathology in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy: A Matched Cohort Analysis |
title_short | Concomitant Lumbar Spine Pathology in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy: A Matched Cohort Analysis |
title_sort | concomitant lumbar spine pathology in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy: a matched cohort analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5565009/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967117S00422 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mahuresiddharthashok concomitantlumbarspinepathologyinpatientsundergoinghiparthroscopyamatchedcohortanalysis AT ryanmichaelk concomitantlumbarspinepathologyinpatientsundergoinghiparthroscopyamatchedcohortanalysis AT bucklandaaron concomitantlumbarspinepathologyinpatientsundergoinghiparthroscopyamatchedcohortanalysis AT hamulamathew concomitantlumbarspinepathologyinpatientsundergoinghiparthroscopyamatchedcohortanalysis AT beglyjohn concomitantlumbarspinepathologyinpatientsundergoinghiparthroscopyamatchedcohortanalysis AT capognabrian concomitantlumbarspinepathologyinpatientsundergoinghiparthroscopyamatchedcohortanalysis AT loozechris concomitantlumbarspinepathologyinpatientsundergoinghiparthroscopyamatchedcohortanalysis AT chenardkristofere concomitantlumbarspinepathologyinpatientsundergoinghiparthroscopyamatchedcohortanalysis AT wolfsontheodore concomitantlumbarspinepathologyinpatientsundergoinghiparthroscopyamatchedcohortanalysis AT youmthomas concomitantlumbarspinepathologyinpatientsundergoinghiparthroscopyamatchedcohortanalysis |