Cargando…

Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: An Overview for Clinicians

Catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) is currently one of the most commonly performed electrophysiology procedures. Ablation of paroxysmal AF is based on the elimination of triggers by pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), while different strategies for additional AF substrate modification on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mujović, Nebojša, Marinković, Milan, Lenarczyk, Radoslaw, Tilz, Roland, Potpara, Tatjana S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5565661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28733782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-017-0590-z
_version_ 1783258425742852096
author Mujović, Nebojša
Marinković, Milan
Lenarczyk, Radoslaw
Tilz, Roland
Potpara, Tatjana S.
author_facet Mujović, Nebojša
Marinković, Milan
Lenarczyk, Radoslaw
Tilz, Roland
Potpara, Tatjana S.
author_sort Mujović, Nebojša
collection PubMed
description Catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) is currently one of the most commonly performed electrophysiology procedures. Ablation of paroxysmal AF is based on the elimination of triggers by pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), while different strategies for additional AF substrate modification on top of PVI have been proposed for ablation of persistent AF. Nowadays, various technologies for AF ablation are available. The radiofrequency point-by-point ablation navigated by electro-anatomical mapping system and cryo-balloon technology are comparable in terms of the efficacy and safety of the PVI procedure. Long-term success of AF ablation including multiple procedures varies from 50 to 80%. Arrhythmia recurrences commonly occur, mostly due to PV reconnection. The recurrences are particularly common in patients with non-paroxysmal AF, dilated left atrium and the "early recurrence" of AF within the first 2–3 post-procedural months. In addition, this complex procedure can be accompanied by serious complications, such as cardiac tamponade, stroke, atrio-esophageal fistula and PV stenosis. Therefore, CA represents a second-line treatment option after a trial of antiarrhythmic drug(s). Good candidates for the procedure are relatively younger patients with symptomatic and frequent episodes of AF, with no significant structural heart disease and no significant left atrial enlargement. Randomized trials demonstrated the superiority of ablation compared to antiarrhythmic drugs in terms of improving the quality of life and symptoms in AF patients. However, nonrandomized studies reported additional clinical benefits from ablation over drug therapy in selected AF patients, such as the reduction of the mortality and stroke rates and the recovery of tachyarrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy. Future research should enable the creation of more durable ablative lesions and the selection of the optimal lesion set in each patient according to the degree of atrial remodeling. This could provide better long-term CA success and expand indications for the procedure, especially among the patients with non-paroxysmal AF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5565661
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55656612017-09-06 Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: An Overview for Clinicians Mujović, Nebojša Marinković, Milan Lenarczyk, Radoslaw Tilz, Roland Potpara, Tatjana S. Adv Ther Review Catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) is currently one of the most commonly performed electrophysiology procedures. Ablation of paroxysmal AF is based on the elimination of triggers by pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), while different strategies for additional AF substrate modification on top of PVI have been proposed for ablation of persistent AF. Nowadays, various technologies for AF ablation are available. The radiofrequency point-by-point ablation navigated by electro-anatomical mapping system and cryo-balloon technology are comparable in terms of the efficacy and safety of the PVI procedure. Long-term success of AF ablation including multiple procedures varies from 50 to 80%. Arrhythmia recurrences commonly occur, mostly due to PV reconnection. The recurrences are particularly common in patients with non-paroxysmal AF, dilated left atrium and the "early recurrence" of AF within the first 2–3 post-procedural months. In addition, this complex procedure can be accompanied by serious complications, such as cardiac tamponade, stroke, atrio-esophageal fistula and PV stenosis. Therefore, CA represents a second-line treatment option after a trial of antiarrhythmic drug(s). Good candidates for the procedure are relatively younger patients with symptomatic and frequent episodes of AF, with no significant structural heart disease and no significant left atrial enlargement. Randomized trials demonstrated the superiority of ablation compared to antiarrhythmic drugs in terms of improving the quality of life and symptoms in AF patients. However, nonrandomized studies reported additional clinical benefits from ablation over drug therapy in selected AF patients, such as the reduction of the mortality and stroke rates and the recovery of tachyarrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy. Future research should enable the creation of more durable ablative lesions and the selection of the optimal lesion set in each patient according to the degree of atrial remodeling. This could provide better long-term CA success and expand indications for the procedure, especially among the patients with non-paroxysmal AF. Springer Healthcare 2017-07-21 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5565661/ /pubmed/28733782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-017-0590-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Mujović, Nebojša
Marinković, Milan
Lenarczyk, Radoslaw
Tilz, Roland
Potpara, Tatjana S.
Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: An Overview for Clinicians
title Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: An Overview for Clinicians
title_full Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: An Overview for Clinicians
title_fullStr Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: An Overview for Clinicians
title_full_unstemmed Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: An Overview for Clinicians
title_short Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: An Overview for Clinicians
title_sort catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: an overview for clinicians
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5565661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28733782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-017-0590-z
work_keys_str_mv AT mujovicnebojsa catheterablationofatrialfibrillationanoverviewforclinicians
AT marinkovicmilan catheterablationofatrialfibrillationanoverviewforclinicians
AT lenarczykradoslaw catheterablationofatrialfibrillationanoverviewforclinicians
AT tilzroland catheterablationofatrialfibrillationanoverviewforclinicians
AT potparatatjanas catheterablationofatrialfibrillationanoverviewforclinicians