Cargando…

New Methods for Quantification of Visual Photosensitivity Threshold and Symptoms

PURPOSE: Visual photosensitivity is a common symptom difficult to measure and diagnose, and is found in many ocular and neurological disorders. We developed two novel reproducible quantitative assessments of visual photosensitivity. METHODS: We designed and built the ocular photosensitivity analyzer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verriotto, Jennifer D., Gonzalez, Alex, Aguilar, Mariela C., Parel, Jean-Marie A., Feuer, William J., Smith, Andrew R., Lam, Byron L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5566267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28845363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.6.4.18
_version_ 1783258521226182656
author Verriotto, Jennifer D.
Gonzalez, Alex
Aguilar, Mariela C.
Parel, Jean-Marie A.
Feuer, William J.
Smith, Andrew R.
Lam, Byron L.
author_facet Verriotto, Jennifer D.
Gonzalez, Alex
Aguilar, Mariela C.
Parel, Jean-Marie A.
Feuer, William J.
Smith, Andrew R.
Lam, Byron L.
author_sort Verriotto, Jennifer D.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Visual photosensitivity is a common symptom difficult to measure and diagnose, and is found in many ocular and neurological disorders. We developed two novel reproducible quantitative assessments of visual photosensitivity. METHODS: We designed and built the ocular photosensitivity analyzer (OPA), an automated instrument to determine light intensity visual photosensitivity threshold (VPT), and developed the Visual Light Sensitivity Questionnaire-8 (VLSQ-8), an eight-question survey to assess the presence and severity of photosensitivity symptoms. We evaluated the test–retest variability and obtained normative values of these two approaches in 35 healthy normal subjects, distributed evenly over five age groups from eight to 60 years. Each subject underwent two test sessions, each with VLSQ-8, eye examination, and OPA, four weeks apart, between April 2015 and June 2016. RESULTS: Log-transformed VPTs (log(10)lux) and VLSQ-8 results were highly reproducible between the two sessions (VPT intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.71–0.93; binocular testing, VLSQ-items ICC range = 0.53–0.87). No consistent significant differences in VPTs were found with monocular (P = 0.053, session 1) or binocular (P = 0.26) testing. Subjects in age group >30 to 40 years had significantly higher VPTs than those in other age groups (P ≤ 0.011) except the >40 to 50 years age group (P = 0.11). Photosensitivity symptoms assessed by the VLSQ-8 generally were low and highly reproducible with ≥88% of responses between the 2 sessions being within one category of each other. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide reliability data and normative results toward validation of two novel approaches to quantify visual photosensitivity and provide support for their potential use in ocular and neurologic conditions as well as in clinical trials. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The new quantitative photosensitivity approaches are potential measures to characterize disease severity, monitor disease progression, and evaluate treatment efficacy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5566267
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55662672017-08-26 New Methods for Quantification of Visual Photosensitivity Threshold and Symptoms Verriotto, Jennifer D. Gonzalez, Alex Aguilar, Mariela C. Parel, Jean-Marie A. Feuer, William J. Smith, Andrew R. Lam, Byron L. Transl Vis Sci Technol Article PURPOSE: Visual photosensitivity is a common symptom difficult to measure and diagnose, and is found in many ocular and neurological disorders. We developed two novel reproducible quantitative assessments of visual photosensitivity. METHODS: We designed and built the ocular photosensitivity analyzer (OPA), an automated instrument to determine light intensity visual photosensitivity threshold (VPT), and developed the Visual Light Sensitivity Questionnaire-8 (VLSQ-8), an eight-question survey to assess the presence and severity of photosensitivity symptoms. We evaluated the test–retest variability and obtained normative values of these two approaches in 35 healthy normal subjects, distributed evenly over five age groups from eight to 60 years. Each subject underwent two test sessions, each with VLSQ-8, eye examination, and OPA, four weeks apart, between April 2015 and June 2016. RESULTS: Log-transformed VPTs (log(10)lux) and VLSQ-8 results were highly reproducible between the two sessions (VPT intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.71–0.93; binocular testing, VLSQ-items ICC range = 0.53–0.87). No consistent significant differences in VPTs were found with monocular (P = 0.053, session 1) or binocular (P = 0.26) testing. Subjects in age group >30 to 40 years had significantly higher VPTs than those in other age groups (P ≤ 0.011) except the >40 to 50 years age group (P = 0.11). Photosensitivity symptoms assessed by the VLSQ-8 generally were low and highly reproducible with ≥88% of responses between the 2 sessions being within one category of each other. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide reliability data and normative results toward validation of two novel approaches to quantify visual photosensitivity and provide support for their potential use in ocular and neurologic conditions as well as in clinical trials. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The new quantitative photosensitivity approaches are potential measures to characterize disease severity, monitor disease progression, and evaluate treatment efficacy. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2017-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5566267/ /pubmed/28845363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.6.4.18 Text en Copyright 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Verriotto, Jennifer D.
Gonzalez, Alex
Aguilar, Mariela C.
Parel, Jean-Marie A.
Feuer, William J.
Smith, Andrew R.
Lam, Byron L.
New Methods for Quantification of Visual Photosensitivity Threshold and Symptoms
title New Methods for Quantification of Visual Photosensitivity Threshold and Symptoms
title_full New Methods for Quantification of Visual Photosensitivity Threshold and Symptoms
title_fullStr New Methods for Quantification of Visual Photosensitivity Threshold and Symptoms
title_full_unstemmed New Methods for Quantification of Visual Photosensitivity Threshold and Symptoms
title_short New Methods for Quantification of Visual Photosensitivity Threshold and Symptoms
title_sort new methods for quantification of visual photosensitivity threshold and symptoms
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5566267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28845363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.6.4.18
work_keys_str_mv AT verriottojenniferd newmethodsforquantificationofvisualphotosensitivitythresholdandsymptoms
AT gonzalezalex newmethodsforquantificationofvisualphotosensitivitythresholdandsymptoms
AT aguilarmarielac newmethodsforquantificationofvisualphotosensitivitythresholdandsymptoms
AT pareljeanmariea newmethodsforquantificationofvisualphotosensitivitythresholdandsymptoms
AT feuerwilliamj newmethodsforquantificationofvisualphotosensitivitythresholdandsymptoms
AT smithandrewr newmethodsforquantificationofvisualphotosensitivitythresholdandsymptoms
AT lambyronl newmethodsforquantificationofvisualphotosensitivitythresholdandsymptoms